Bulwark writer Catherine Rampell reports the administration of president Donald Trump is quietly building the kinds of watchlists that should make historians nervousBulwark writer Catherine Rampell reports the administration of president Donald Trump is quietly building the kinds of watchlists that should make historians nervous

'Do you feel safer?' 'Funny business' as Trump builds lists of dissidents and Jews

2026/01/23 11:24
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Bulwark writer Catherine Rampell reports the administration of president Donald Trump is quietly building the kinds of watchlists that should make historians nervous.

“There are lists of immigrants, lists of people with developmental disabilities, lists of dissidents — and lately, even lists of Jews,” said Rampell. “All ostensibly in the name of public safety.”

The administration recently sued the University of Pennsylvania to surrender a list of Jewish faculty, staff, and students, all without obtaining consent from Jewish community members themselves. The administration claims they require the Jewish registry to “combat antisemitism” on college campuses. But critics argue there’s no guarantee such a list wouldn’t fall into the wrong hands, particularly in this administration’s coalition with so many “Jew haters and Holocaust deniers,” Rampell claims. It’s certainly a bad idea in this political environment, where young white men are getting busted for trying to burn Jewish churches in Jackson, Mississippi.

“Against a backdrop of rising antisemitism, white supremacy, and other forms of hate, the danger that lists of Jews or other groups could fall into the wrong hands looms especially large,” according to a filing this week from groups affiliated with UPenn.

“The possibility that these data could be misused is not just a baseless, hypothetical concern: Again and again the Trump administration has been caught sharing data and breaching confidential records for purposes other than the stated reason for why those confidential records were collected in the first place,” said Rampell.

Just last year a whistleblower alleged that DOGE had unlawfully accessed private Social Security data and copied it into an unsecure cloud environment susceptible to manipulation and exposure.

“They’ve been sucking up data from all across government for immigration enforcement purposes, like basically anything that might have names, familial relationship, address, any geographic information,” said Bethanne Barnes, the former chief data officer for the Administration for Children and Families at Health and Human Services. “Just assume it’s all getting sucked in.”

“Barnes quit, she told me last week, in part due to some ‘funny business’ related to the government’s matching up of information on immigrant children with a national database of employment records,” Rampell said.

Meanwhile, Rampell reports the National Institutes of Health director echoed a certain unsettling historical figure when he announced that his agency will be creating a “disease registry” of people with autism — compiled without consent and against the wishes of members of the autism community.

Trump’s border czar Tom Homan, similarly, is threatening to create his own “database” of ICE protestors, which Rampell said sounds “an awful lot like twentieth-century government databases of Commies, wrongthinkers, and other political enemies. Or perhaps worse historical analogues, from Europe, also implemented in the name of keeping the public safe from the enemies within.”

“So I ask you, my fellow Americans,” concluded Rampell. “Do you feel safer yet?”

Read the Bulwark report at this link.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken

Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken

The post Nasdaq Launches Equity Token Design With Kraken appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Nasdaq, the world’s second-largest stock exchange by market capitalization
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/10 10:40
Video Marketing Technology: Platform Selection, Distribution and Performance Measurement

Video Marketing Technology: Platform Selection, Distribution and Performance Measurement

Video content drives engagement more effectively than static imagery across virtually all platforms and audience segments. Video marketing effectiveness depends
Share
Techbullion2026/03/10 10:23