The relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companiesThe relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companies

Why 75% of Banks Now Collaborate With Fintech Startups

2026/03/24 07:28
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The relationship between banks and fintech startups has undergone a fundamental shift. A decade ago, the narrative was one of disruption, with fintech companies positioning themselves as replacements for traditional banking. Today, roughly 75% of banks worldwide actively collaborate with fintech startups, according to research from KPMG and the World Economic Forum. The antagonistic dynamic has given way to a symbiotic relationship where both sides benefit.

This shift did not happen by accident. Banks discovered that building technology in-house was expensive, slow, and often produced inferior results compared to partnering with specialised fintech companies. Fintech startups learned that scaling financial services requires access to banking infrastructure, regulatory licences, and established customer trust that takes decades to build. Collaboration became the pragmatic choice for both sides.

Why 75% of Banks Now Collaborate With Fintech Startups

Why Banks Turned to Fintech Partnerships

The primary driver of bank-fintech collaboration is speed. Banks operate on technology cycles measured in years. A major core banking upgrade might take three to five years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Fintech partnerships allow banks to deploy new capabilities in months rather than years. A bank that wants to offer real-time payments, digital onboarding, or AI-powered customer service can partner with a fintech provider rather than building from scratch.

Cost pressure is the second major factor. Traditional banks spend between 15% and 25% of their revenue on technology, according to Gartner. Despite these enormous budgets, much of the spending goes toward maintaining legacy systems rather than building new capabilities. Fintech partnerships allow banks to redirect technology investment toward innovation rather than maintenance. The fintech company handles the specialised development, and the bank integrates the solution into its existing infrastructure.

Customer expectations are the third driver. Bank customers, particularly younger demographics, expect digital experiences that match what they receive from consumer technology companies. Banks that cannot deliver seamless mobile banking, instant payments, and personalised financial insights risk losing customers to digital-first competitors. Fintech partnerships enable banks to meet these expectations without building every capability internally.

What Collaboration Looks Like in Practice

Bank-fintech collaboration takes many forms. The simplest is vendor relationships, where banks purchase fintech products or services. A bank might use a fintech company’s fraud detection system, digital onboarding platform, or payment processing engine. These relationships are transactional and focused on specific capabilities.

Strategic partnerships go deeper. A bank and a fintech company might co-develop a product, share data, or jointly serve a customer segment. For example, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apple to launch the Apple Card, combining Goldman’s banking licence and credit capabilities with Apple’s consumer technology platform. Similar partnerships exist between banks and fintech companies across payments, lending, and wealth management.

Investment relationships represent another form of collaboration. Many large banks operate venture capital arms that invest in fintech startups. Citi Ventures, HSBC’s innovation team, and Barclays’ accelerator programme all provide funding, mentorship, and potential integration opportunities to early-stage fintech companies. These investments give banks early access to emerging technologies while providing startups with capital and credibility.

Banking-as-a-service arrangements represent the most integrated form of collaboration. Banks provide their regulatory licences, deposit infrastructure, and payment rails to fintech companies, which then build customer-facing products on top. This model allows fintech companies to offer banking products without obtaining their own licences, while banks earn revenue from infrastructure they have already built.

Where the Partnerships Are Concentrated

Certain areas of banking attract more fintech collaboration than others. Payments is the most active category, with banks partnering with fintech companies for real-time payments, cross-border transfers, and merchant acquiring services. Digital identity and customer onboarding is the second most active area, as banks seek to reduce friction in account opening while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Lending partnerships are growing rapidly, particularly in small business lending and consumer credit. Banks use fintech platforms to reach borrower segments they cannot serve efficiently through traditional channels. The fintech company provides the technology platform and customer acquisition, while the bank provides the capital and regulatory framework.

Compliance and regulatory technology is another growing area. Anti-money laundering, know-your-customer, and transaction monitoring all require sophisticated technology that fintech companies often provide more effectively than internal bank teams. Regulatory requirements continue to increase in complexity, making these partnerships increasingly valuable.

Challenges in Bank-Fintech Collaboration

Despite the growth in partnerships, significant challenges remain. Cultural differences between banks and fintech startups create friction. Banks prioritise risk management, regulatory compliance, and process consistency. Fintech companies prioritise speed, experimentation, and user experience. Bridging these different organisational cultures requires effort from both sides.

Technology integration is often more difficult than anticipated. Connecting a modern fintech platform to a bank’s legacy core banking system can be complex and time-consuming. Data formats, security protocols, and processing workflows may be incompatible. The integration challenge is one of the main reasons bank-fintech partnerships sometimes fail to deliver expected results.

Regulatory uncertainty also creates challenges. Banks are responsible for the compliance of their partners, even when the fintech company is providing the customer-facing service. This third-party risk management requirement means banks must conduct extensive due diligence on their fintech partners and monitor their ongoing compliance. For fintech startups, meeting these requirements can be burdensome and expensive.

The Direction of the Relationship

The 75% collaboration rate will likely continue to increase. The few banks that do not partner with fintech companies tend to be smaller institutions with limited technology budgets or banks in markets where fintech ecosystems are less developed. As fintech infrastructure matures and integration becomes easier, even these holdouts are likely to adopt partnership strategies.

The nature of partnerships is also evolving. Early collaborations were often experimental, with banks testing fintech solutions in limited pilots. Increasingly, fintech partnerships are becoming core to bank strategy, embedded in technology roadmaps and business plans. The distinction between bank and fintech is blurring as both sides adopt characteristics of the other. Banks are becoming more technology-driven, and fintech companies are becoming more regulated. The result is a financial services ecosystem that is more collaborative, more innovative, and better equipped to serve customers than either side could achieve alone.

Comments
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

South Korea’s $657 Million Exit from Tesla Signals a Big Crypto Pivot

South Korea’s $657 Million Exit from Tesla Signals a Big Crypto Pivot

In a dramatic shift in investment patterns, South Korean retail investors withdrew $657 million from Tesla stock in August 2025, representing the largest monthly outflow in more than two years. At the same time, by mid-2025, they had shifted more than $12 billion into U.S.-listed companies tied to cryptocurrency, indicating a deepening preference for digital […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 14:00
MetaMask to Launch Its Token Sooner Than Expected, Says ConsenSys CEO

MetaMask to Launch Its Token Sooner Than Expected, Says ConsenSys CEO

The post MetaMask to Launch Its Token Sooner Than Expected, Says ConsenSys CEO appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News MetaMask, the world’s leading Web3 wallet and gateway to decentralized apps, is gearing up to launch its own token. In a recent interview, Consensys CEO and Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin revealed that a MetaMask token could be launched much earlier than people think, sparking excitement among users and investors who have long been waiting for …
Share
CoinPedia2025/09/19 12:56
How is the xStocks tokenized stock market developing?

How is the xStocks tokenized stock market developing?

Author: Heechang Compiled by: TechFlow xStocks offers a tokenized stock service, allowing investors to trade tokenized versions of popular US stocks like Tesla in real time. While still in its early stages, it’s already showing some interesting signs of growth. Observation 1: Trading is concentrated in Tesla (TSLA) As in many emerging markets, trading activity has quickly concentrated on a handful of stocks. Data shows a high concentration of trading volume in the most well-known and volatile stocks, with Tesla being the most prominent example. This concentration is not surprising: liquidity tends to accumulate in assets that retail investors already favor, and early adopters often use familiar high-beta stocks to test new infrastructure. Observation 2: Liquidity decreases on weekends Data shows that on-chain equity trading volume drops to 30% or less of weekday levels over the weekend. Unlike crypto-native assets, which trade seamlessly around the clock, tokenized stocks still inherit the behavioral inertia of traditional market trading hours. Traders appear less willing to trade when reference markets (such as Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange) are closed, likely due to concerns about arbitrage, price gaps, and the inability to hedge positions off-chain. Observation 3: Prices move in line with the Nasdaq Another key signal comes from pricing behavior during the initial launch period. Initially, xStocks tokens traded at a significant premium to their Nasdaq counterparts, reflecting market enthusiasm and potential friction in bridging fiat liquidity. However, these premiums gradually diminished over time. Current trading patterns show that the token price is at the upper limit of Tesla's intraday price range and is highly consistent with the Nasdaq reference price. Arbitrageurs appear to be maintaining this price discipline, but there are still small deviations from the intraday highs, indicating some market inefficiencies that may present opportunities and risks for active traders. New opportunities for Korean stock investors? South Korean investors currently hold over $100 billion in US stocks, with trading volume increasing 17-fold since January 2020. Existing infrastructure for South Korean investors to trade US stocks is limited by high fees, long settlement times, and slow cash-out processes, creating opportunities for tokenized or on-chain mirror stocks. As the infrastructure and platforms supporting on-chain US stock markets continue to improve, a new group of South Korean traders will enter the crypto market, which is undoubtedly a huge opportunity.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 08:00