The post 10 Scariest Horror Movies According To Viewer Heart Rate appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When you talk about the best or worst or in this case, scariest horror movies out there, you are usually relying on personal opinion, even if you’re citing somewhere like Rotten Tomatoes, an amalgam of personal opinions. But there’s a project that tries to measure the scariest movies in existence using science. You can choose to believe it or not, but they have data to present. This is the Science of Scare project, an ongoing experiment via MoneySuperMarket that uses viewer heartbeat changes to map out which horror movies are the scariest in terms of how much they result in a physiological change in the audience. Perfect scientific methodology? Unlikely, but it’s fun to see all the same, and see if you agree or disagree with the top 10. Here’s how this is calculated, according to those running the project: “The Scare Score system, which combines both heart rate (measured in beats per minute BPM), and heart rate variance (measured in milliseconds, or m/s), returns for 2025. With heart rate (BPM), the higher the number, the faster the movie got our audiences’ blood pumping, an indicator of excitement and fear as part of your fight or flight instinct. “On the other hand, heart rate variance (HRV), measures the time in between each beat of your heart. The lower the heart rate variance the more stressed our audience members became, a good indicator of slow burn fear and dread. “After collecting the average heart rate increase and HRV decrease, we then combine both scores to create a Science of Scare Score out of 100. For comparison, Shrek holds a ‘Scare Score’ of 3 out of 100.” I love how they use Shrek as a control group. Anyway, here is the top 10 list of scariest horror movies: 1) Sinister – 96… The post 10 Scariest Horror Movies According To Viewer Heart Rate appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When you talk about the best or worst or in this case, scariest horror movies out there, you are usually relying on personal opinion, even if you’re citing somewhere like Rotten Tomatoes, an amalgam of personal opinions. But there’s a project that tries to measure the scariest movies in existence using science. You can choose to believe it or not, but they have data to present. This is the Science of Scare project, an ongoing experiment via MoneySuperMarket that uses viewer heartbeat changes to map out which horror movies are the scariest in terms of how much they result in a physiological change in the audience. Perfect scientific methodology? Unlikely, but it’s fun to see all the same, and see if you agree or disagree with the top 10. Here’s how this is calculated, according to those running the project: “The Scare Score system, which combines both heart rate (measured in beats per minute BPM), and heart rate variance (measured in milliseconds, or m/s), returns for 2025. With heart rate (BPM), the higher the number, the faster the movie got our audiences’ blood pumping, an indicator of excitement and fear as part of your fight or flight instinct. “On the other hand, heart rate variance (HRV), measures the time in between each beat of your heart. The lower the heart rate variance the more stressed our audience members became, a good indicator of slow burn fear and dread. “After collecting the average heart rate increase and HRV decrease, we then combine both scores to create a Science of Scare Score out of 100. For comparison, Shrek holds a ‘Scare Score’ of 3 out of 100.” I love how they use Shrek as a control group. Anyway, here is the top 10 list of scariest horror movies: 1) Sinister – 96…

10 Scariest Horror Movies According To Viewer Heart Rate

When you talk about the best or worst or in this case, scariest horror movies out there, you are usually relying on personal opinion, even if you’re citing somewhere like Rotten Tomatoes, an amalgam of personal opinions. But there’s a project that tries to measure the scariest movies in existence using science. You can choose to believe it or not, but they have data to present.

This is the Science of Scare project, an ongoing experiment via MoneySuperMarket that uses viewer heartbeat changes to map out which horror movies are the scariest in terms of how much they result in a physiological change in the audience. Perfect scientific methodology? Unlikely, but it’s fun to see all the same, and see if you agree or disagree with the top 10.

Here’s how this is calculated, according to those running the project:

“The Scare Score system, which combines both heart rate (measured in beats per minute BPM), and heart rate variance (measured in milliseconds, or m/s), returns for 2025. With heart rate (BPM), the higher the number, the faster the movie got our audiences’ blood pumping, an indicator of excitement and fear as part of your fight or flight instinct.

“On the other hand, heart rate variance (HRV), measures the time in between each beat of your heart. The lower the heart rate variance the more stressed our audience members became, a good indicator of slow burn fear and dread.

“After collecting the average heart rate increase and HRV decrease, we then combine both scores to create a Science of Scare Score out of 100. For comparison, Shrek holds a ‘Scare Score’ of 3 out of 100.”

I love how they use Shrek as a control group. Anyway, here is the top 10 list of scariest horror movies:

1) Sinister – 96 Scare Score

2) Host – 95

3) Skinamarink – 91

4) Insidious – 90

5) The Conjuring – 88

6) Hereditary – 81

7) Smile 2 – 79

8) Smile – 78

9) The Exorcism of Emily Rose – 76

10) Talk to Me/Hell House LLC – 75

Not all that many movies are added to the list every year (this is only English-language horror films, incidentally). This year, that included Smile 2, which made the top 10, Bring Her Back (#24), The Conjuring: Last Rites (#49) and Weapons (#50). They only rank the top 50, and 28 Years Later, Together and Ugly Stepsister did not make the cut.

I can understand Sinister being #1, as it has at least one of the craziest jump scares I’ve ever seen that I won’t ever forget. Host is a often-overlooked horror film that takes place entirely over Zoom during quarantine lockdown, which sounds absurd, but it works, and it’s fantastic. I have little doubt that the most controversial entry on the list is going to be Skinamirink, a movie you will either love or absolutely, totally hate. I get why it’s here in terms of the “pervasive dread” metric, because the entire movie is more or less pervasive dread as you wait for something to happen. Very few things happen.

I am glad to see Smile 2 make the list. I didn’t love the first one, but Smile 2 is fantastic and I am not kidding, features an Oscar nomination-worthy performance from star Naomi Scott. Also on the list is Hereditary, which I count among my favorite horror films of all time. Check any of these out. I mean, really most of that entire top 50 list is worth watching. Happy Halloween!

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/10/20/10-scariest-horror-movies-according-to-viewer-heart-rate/

Market Opportunity
Humans.ai Logo
Humans.ai Price(HEART)
$0.0007404
$0.0007404$0.0007404
+1.09%
USD
Humans.ai (HEART) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Pippin (PIPPIN) Price Prediction 2026–2030: Can PIPPIN Hit $0.70 Soon?

Pippin (PIPPIN) Price Prediction 2026–2030: Can PIPPIN Hit $0.70 Soon?

PIPPIN has surged sharply on the daily timeframe, printing a powerful bullish candle with over 25% gains. RSI is holding above 60, signaling strengthening momentum
Share
Coinstats2026/02/23 04:29
Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles

Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles

The post Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Cardano (ADA) is trading at $0.9024 with a market cap of $32.91 billion. Experts say ADA has the potential to climb much higher, with some placing long-term targets as high as $10. The token continues to benefit from stronger visibility, rising liquidity, and increasing inflows from both institutional and retail markets. Can Cardano Hit $10 …
Share
CoinPedia2025/09/18 17:19
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31