Balance shift: a new report from Deutsche Bank opens up the possibility that Bitcoin may appear among the official reserves of central banks by 2030, alongside gold as a hedge asset.
While the dollar remains the core of the system, there is room for alternative assets in response to inflation and geopolitical tensions. In this context, the hypothesis moves from a niche scenario to an option monitored with greater attention; the thesis is consistent with the data on reserve compositions published by the IMF COFER, which show the persistence of the dollar’s role.
According to the data collected by our team of analysts and the on-chain verifications conducted in the first half of 2025, a measurable improvement in the depth of order books on regulated venues has been observed, along with a progressive average compression of spreads on institutional ETPs.
Interviews with custody desks and market operators also confirm that in 2025 numerous players completed infrastructure upgrades for institutional custody, improving governance and audit processes. These field findings reinforce the interpretation of Deutsche Bank and the available official data.
Analysts at Deutsche Bank consider it plausible that Bitcoin could complement gold as a reserve asset. Among the key signals are a decreasing 30-day volatility—which reached multi-year lows in August 2025—a greater market depth, and enhanced regulatory attention in major jurisdictions.
It should be noted that the combination of these elements favors a progressive normalization of the asset.
The hypothesized path mirrors that of gold, moving from initial skepticism to gradual acceptance, due to its scarcity, low correlation with traditional markets, and its hedging function in macroeconomic stress scenarios. That said, coexistence with gold is seen as complementary, not substitutive.
Deutsche Bank suggests that some central banks might include Bitcoin in their balance sheets by 2030, while continuing to maintain gold as the primary reserve.
The trajectory will depend on elements such as regulatory clarity in the USA, EU, and Asia – as outlined in evolving provisions, including the MiCA package in Europe – the necessary price stability with further declines in volatility, and the liquidity of spot and derivatives markets, with tight spreads and reliability of instruments like ETP. Indeed, without these prerequisites, inclusion in reserves would remain premature.
The scenario varies depending on access to the dollar, existing regulations, and monetary policy priorities. Some regions might adopt Bitcoin to a lesser extent or experience different dynamics. Yet, the direction of movement is being watched with increasing attention by more players.
The regulatory and stability framework is consolidating. In Europe, the MiCA package is being implemented in phases, while in the USA, rules related to spot ETFs, custody, and accounting are being defined in an evolving context.
In Asia, financial hubs are refining licenses and prudential requirements for the crypto sector. In summary, the direction is towards greater clarity, but timing is crucial.
For the inclusion of Bitcoin in official reserves, market transparency, the reliability of custodians, and a fully operational AML/CFT framework are essential, along with a sustained reduction in volatility. That said, field verification of these requirements remains crucial.
Bitcoin shares characteristics with gold such as scarcity and the function of a hedge against the erosion of purchasing power.
However, although Bitcoin has a shorter history and greater sensitivity to global liquidity cycles, according to Deutsche Bank, neither asset will replace the dollar, but both will help balance its risks in the reserve mix. In this context, the logic is one of complement and diversification.
Diversification of reserves, reduction of exposure to dollar shocks, and obtaining a hedge against inflation and geopolitical risks are among the main reasons.
Essential conditions are clear regulatory rules, high liquidity, secure custody, and contained volatility. Without these safeguards, the role of Bitcoin in reserves would necessarily remain limited.
The inclusion of Bitcoin in official balance sheets by 2030 seems plausible, although conditioned by progress on regulation, price stability, and market infrastructure.
The dollar remains the cornerstone of global reserves, while gold and Bitcoin could play a complementary hedging role in an increasingly fragmented financial context. Ultimately, the outcome will depend on the market’s ability to consolidate stress-tested standards and practices.


