Republican effort to overturn humiliating loss shot down in court

The GOP's immediate attempt to overturn their humiliating redistricting loss in Virginia has fallen flat, per a report from The Hill, with a judge ruling this weekend in favor of the Democrats and their new maps that could spell even more doom for Republicans in the midterms.

Last week, voters in Virginia approved a new congressional district map by a 3-point margin, clearing the way for as many as four more Democratic seats in the House of Representatives in the coming midterm elections. The state's Democratic government put forward the redistricting effort as a means to combat similar efforts in red states like Texas to create more Republican seats in the House at the behest of President Donald Trump, who hoped to avoid losing the GOP's razor-thin majority in the chamber.

Voters approved the change, as they also did in California, but Republicans fought back against the humiliating loss in court, getting a judge to swiftly shoot down the new map, pending another ruling from a higher court. On Sunday, that ruling arrived, with Richmond Circuit Court Judge Tracy Thorne-Begland denying a request from the Republican National Committee, the Virginia Republican and other parties that the map be tossed out.

In his ruling, Thorne-Begland said it was not for the court to dictate or chastise policy, but rather to ensure that lawmakers reached their ends in compliance with the law.

“This Court knows its role is clear. It is not to assess the wisdom of public policy nor to engage in policy making from the bench,” the judge explained. “Instead, it is to decide if those with whom we have entrusted power have exercised that power in conformance with their constitutional mandate. On this question, the Court’s answer is in the affirmative.”

Republicans first filed the request in April, days prior to the vote itself, claiming that the map "violated the state Constitution," according to The Hill, and was “adopted without legal authority when enacted." They also argued that the new districts were not "compact," a term that, in this context, refers to districts being created with reasonable, smooth and geometric shapes, as opposed to odd shapes obviously intended to achieve partisan goals.

Thorne-Begland concurred that the new districts were not compact, though it did not ultimately impact his ruling.

"The 2026 maps are undoubtedly less compact than the ones they replace," the judge wrote. "They are certainly partisan gerrymanders. They displace both representatives and voters into new, oddly shaped districts."

The issue will next be considered by the Virginia Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court, meanwhile, previously ruled in favor of California's new Democrat-favored maps, which were drafted and approved by voters in a similar fashion.

• george conway
• noam chomsky
• civil war
• Kayleigh mcenany
• Melania trump
• drudge report
• paul krugman
• Lindsey graham
• Lincoln project
• al franken bill maher
• People of praise
• Ivanka trump
• eric trump