The US Supreme Court refused Google’s request to stay a lower court’s ruling.The US Supreme Court refused Google’s request to stay a lower court’s ruling.

US Supreme Court rejects Google’s bid to block PlayStore changes

The US Supreme Court rejected Google’s request to halt a series of significant PlayStore changes related to its antitrust dispute with Fortnite developer Epic Games.

The Alphabet-owned tech giant was trying to thwart a Northern District of California ruling that forces it to provide rival app stores with access, eliminate restrictions on outside downloads, and allow developers to direct users toward alternative, lower-cost payment systems. Android users would also be able to purchase apps directly from developers as needed, at flexible prices.

As of now, the Supreme Court has yet to say why it dismissed Google’s appeal.

Google maintains that the directed reforms will compromise user security

Google said it was disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision to reject its request but confirmed that it will continue to pursue its appeal. The company’s spokesperson also shared, “Android provides more choice for users and developers than any mobile OS, and the changes ordered by the US District Court will jeopardize users’ ability to safely download apps.”

Earlier, Google had also warned that the mandated changes could put users at risk and ultimately slow the pace of innovation for Android.

The case dates back to a 2020 lawsuit filed by Epic Games, which accused Google of maintaining an illegal monopoly through its control of Android app distribution and in-app payments. A California jury sided with Epic Games, concluding that Google’s PlayStore practices breached antitrust laws. Judge James Donato subsequently mandated that Google open Android to competitors and let developers use their own billing platforms for three years.

The Ninth Circuit upheld the verdict in July, and two months later, Google asked for a stay to postpone the remedies while it prepared to file a Supreme Court appeal by October 27. After the Supreme Court’s rejection, Google must implement the required changes by October 22 unless its full appeal overturns the ruling.

However, the Supreme Court decision hints that Google may have little chance of reversing the ruling.

Epic Chief Executive Officer Tim Sweeney commented on the court’s decision, saying, “The Supreme Court has thrown out Google’s stay request. Starting October 22, developers will be legally entitled to steer US Google Play users to out-of-app payments without fees, scare screens, and friction – same as Apple App Store users in the US!”

Epic Games filed a lawsuit against Apple on similar grounds of an illegal monopoly

Epic Games launched a similar case against Apple in 2020 after the iPhone maker pulled Fortnite from its App Store over a dispute involving commission fees and payment rules.

According to Apple, it had to remove Fortnite after Epic added its own payment option to the game, allowing players to bypass Apple’s system and avoid the 30% commission — a clear breach of App Store policy. After which Epic filed a legal complaint against Apple, arguing that the tech giant illegally controls how apps are distributed on iPhones and iPads.

The case went before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in May 2021, who handed down a mixed verdict, ruling that Apple wasn’t a monopoly but must allow developers to direct users to external payment methods. Nevertheless, both firms sought to appeal her ruling. However, the Ninth Circuit has turned down Apple’s latest appeal to delay the remedies, and features such as links to alternative payment methods are already in place.

The two companies have long clashed over Apple’s App Store policies and the commission it charges on in-app purchases. Earlier this year, Epic scored a significant victory when Judge Rogers ruled that Apple was in “willful violation” of a previous injunction aimed at curbing anti-competitive pricing. That decision appeared to pave the way for Fortnite’s return and for developers to implement their own payment options. Apple, however, swiftly announced it would appeal the ruling.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
CreatorBid Logo
CreatorBid Price(BID)
$0.01472
$0.01472$0.01472
+1.16%
USD
CreatorBid (BID) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP has traded near $1.90 as Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has predicted from Davos that the crypto market will reach new highs this year. Analysts have pointed
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 04:49
Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook

Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook

The Supreme Court has refused to support President Donald Trump in his attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, after justices raised serious doubts
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/22 05:30