The post The Threat That Might Never Come appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The notion that quantum computers could one day unravel Bitcoin’s code has long fascinated the crypto world. For some, it’s the digital equivalent of a doomsday prophecy; for others, it’s an overhyped distraction from the network’s real challenges. The latest spark came from market veteran Peter Brandt, who warned that the “ultimate risk” to Bitcoin isn’t regulation or competition – but rather the hypothetical day when someone unlocks Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched Bitcoin trove. His concern stems from the belief that a future quantum computer could, in theory, break the cryptography protecting those long-dormant wallets. Satoshi’s Silent Fortune Roughly 1.1 million BTC, attributed to Bitcoin’s mysterious creator, has remained frozen for 15 years. No movement. No signatures. Just an enormous, sleeping fortune that has fueled endless speculation. Some in the community think those coins are lost forever – perhaps because Satoshi is gone. Others imagine they could someday reappear through an automated “dead man’s switch.” Either way, their immobility has become a symbol of Bitcoin’s purity and permanence. But Brandt and a handful of analysts, including Capriole founder Charles Edwards, argue that quantum technology might one day change that. They point to Shor’s algorithm, which – if run on a sufficiently powerful quantum machine – could reverse-engineer private keys from public data, effectively rendering old wallets vulnerable. How Real Is the Quantum Threat? For now, experts agree that the technology simply isn’t there. Quantum computers exist, but none come close to the scale needed to crack Bitcoin’s SHA-256 encryption. Even with rapid scientific progress, such power is believed to be decades away. “Quantum computing is a risk in theory, not in practice,” one researcher noted. “By the time it becomes feasible, Bitcoin will likely have evolved with post-quantum security.” That sentiment echoes across the crypto space. Chun Wang, co-founder of… The post The Threat That Might Never Come appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin The notion that quantum computers could one day unravel Bitcoin’s code has long fascinated the crypto world. For some, it’s the digital equivalent of a doomsday prophecy; for others, it’s an overhyped distraction from the network’s real challenges. The latest spark came from market veteran Peter Brandt, who warned that the “ultimate risk” to Bitcoin isn’t regulation or competition – but rather the hypothetical day when someone unlocks Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched Bitcoin trove. His concern stems from the belief that a future quantum computer could, in theory, break the cryptography protecting those long-dormant wallets. Satoshi’s Silent Fortune Roughly 1.1 million BTC, attributed to Bitcoin’s mysterious creator, has remained frozen for 15 years. No movement. No signatures. Just an enormous, sleeping fortune that has fueled endless speculation. Some in the community think those coins are lost forever – perhaps because Satoshi is gone. Others imagine they could someday reappear through an automated “dead man’s switch.” Either way, their immobility has become a symbol of Bitcoin’s purity and permanence. But Brandt and a handful of analysts, including Capriole founder Charles Edwards, argue that quantum technology might one day change that. They point to Shor’s algorithm, which – if run on a sufficiently powerful quantum machine – could reverse-engineer private keys from public data, effectively rendering old wallets vulnerable. How Real Is the Quantum Threat? For now, experts agree that the technology simply isn’t there. Quantum computers exist, but none come close to the scale needed to crack Bitcoin’s SHA-256 encryption. Even with rapid scientific progress, such power is believed to be decades away. “Quantum computing is a risk in theory, not in practice,” one researcher noted. “By the time it becomes feasible, Bitcoin will likely have evolved with post-quantum security.” That sentiment echoes across the crypto space. Chun Wang, co-founder of…

The Threat That Might Never Come

Bitcoin

The notion that quantum computers could one day unravel Bitcoin’s code has long fascinated the crypto world.

For some, it’s the digital equivalent of a doomsday prophecy; for others, it’s an overhyped distraction from the network’s real challenges.

The latest spark came from market veteran Peter Brandt, who warned that the “ultimate risk” to Bitcoin isn’t regulation or competition – but rather the hypothetical day when someone unlocks Satoshi Nakamoto’s untouched Bitcoin trove. His concern stems from the belief that a future quantum computer could, in theory, break the cryptography protecting those long-dormant wallets.

Satoshi’s Silent Fortune

Roughly 1.1 million BTC, attributed to Bitcoin’s mysterious creator, has remained frozen for 15 years. No movement. No signatures. Just an enormous, sleeping fortune that has fueled endless speculation.

Some in the community think those coins are lost forever – perhaps because Satoshi is gone. Others imagine they could someday reappear through an automated “dead man’s switch.” Either way, their immobility has become a symbol of Bitcoin’s purity and permanence.

But Brandt and a handful of analysts, including Capriole founder Charles Edwards, argue that quantum technology might one day change that. They point to Shor’s algorithm, which – if run on a sufficiently powerful quantum machine – could reverse-engineer private keys from public data, effectively rendering old wallets vulnerable.

How Real Is the Quantum Threat?

For now, experts agree that the technology simply isn’t there. Quantum computers exist, but none come close to the scale needed to crack Bitcoin’s SHA-256 encryption. Even with rapid scientific progress, such power is believed to be decades away.

“Quantum computing is a risk in theory, not in practice,” one researcher noted. “By the time it becomes feasible, Bitcoin will likely have evolved with post-quantum security.”

That sentiment echoes across the crypto space. Chun Wang, co-founder of F2Pool and one of Bitcoin’s early miners, recently dismissed the quantum narrative as “science fiction,” joking that developers should focus on making Bitcoin usable beyond Earth before worrying about hackers from the future.

Preparing for Tomorrow, Without the Panic

Developers and cryptographers are already working on post-quantum cryptography, designing algorithms that would resist even the most advanced computing breakthroughs. These updates could be integrated into the Bitcoin protocol well before any credible quantum threat emerges.

For now, the real story isn’t that quantum computers might destroy Bitcoin – it’s how the fear of them keeps inspiring innovation.

Until proven otherwise, Satoshi’s coins remain untouched, and Bitcoin’s cryptography continues to hold strong. The mystery endures, not because of quantum computers, but because the system has survived every challenge thrown its way – mathematical or otherwise.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things. He is fluent in German and has more than 3 years of experience in the crypto space, where he skillfully identifies new trends in the world of digital currencies. Whether providing in-depth analysis or daily reports on all topics, his deep understanding and enthusiasm for what he does make him a valuable member of the team.



Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/quantum-computers-vs-bitcoin-the-threat-that-might-never-come/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP has traded near $1.90 as Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has predicted from Davos that the crypto market will reach new highs this year. Analysts have pointed
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 04:49
Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook

Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook

The Supreme Court has refused to support President Donald Trump in his attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, after justices raised serious doubts
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/22 05:30