VanEck analysts note that active DATs are underpricing volatility to keep funding crypto buys, but falling swings and limited liquidity could make this harder. If market excitement and volatility drop, investor premiums and mNAVs may fade too. Some companies have…VanEck analysts note that active DATs are underpricing volatility to keep funding crypto buys, but falling swings and limited liquidity could make this harder. If market excitement and volatility drop, investor premiums and mNAVs may fade too. Some companies have…

Crypto treasury firms might face limits as crypto volatility declines, VanEck warns

VanEck analysts note that active DATs are underpricing volatility to keep funding crypto buys, but falling swings and limited liquidity could make this harder. If market excitement and volatility drop, investor premiums and mNAVs may fade too.

Summary
  • VanEck analysts say some of the most active DATs, like BNMR, are underpricing volatility to attract traders and fund more crypto purchases.
  • But with cryptocurrency swings trending down and liquidity limited, this strategy may not work as smoothly in the future.
  • Eventually, premiums and mNAVs that investors currently count on could fade if market excitement and volatility decline.

Some companies have found a curious way to keep riding the crypto wave, but it’s not as simple as buying cryptocurrencies. Instead, they’re playing a financial game that depends on swings in their own stock and the broader crypto market, as VanEck analysts say the so-called digital asset treasuries, or simply DATs, are growing fast but rely heavily on volatility to keep their strategies working.

By September of this year, DATs held about $135 billion in assets, with more than half concentrated in MicroStrategy, VanEck noted in a recent market overview.

As the analysts explain, DATs are using stock and options sales to boost their crypto holdings, rather than buying more coins directly. Some of them now trade at premiums to the value of their digital asset holdings, with the analysts suggesting this happens because “the market [assigns] a premium to entities that have a credible long-term ability to increase per-share digital asset exposure.”

To pull this off, DATs often sell securities tied to the volatility of their own stock. VanEck analysts note that to “reap the benefits of the volatility of their common shares (and the underlying digital assets), these entities must price the volatility they are selling well below the implied volatility of options.” The setup allows sophisticated traders to buy cheap volatility and hedge against pricier options. Over time, the volatility of the two positions tends to converge, which can create profits for the traders.

How BNMR shows game in action

Bitmine’s BNMR share provides a clear example of how this works in action. VanEck analysts highlight that BNMR is “the most widely traded DAT by nearly a factor of two,” yet it still has to underprice volatility to attract buyers.

Bitmine Immersion, the largest ETH-focused DAT with more than $11 billion in Ethereum (ETH) holdings, recently sold shares at $70 while the stock was trading at $61.39. These shares came with two warrants to buy more stock at a higher price. Using options math, each warrant is worth roughly $20, meaning the total package was worth about $104.61, but investors paid only $70.

Crypto treasury firms might face limits as crypto volatility declines, VanEck warns - 1

VanEck analysts describe this as BNMR “underpricing volatility by selling warrants at a steep discount,” giving speculators an extra opportunity if they can handle the options risk. The analysts also point out that DATs are essentially “volatility reactors,” borrowing Michael Saylor’s term. They need consistent market swings to fund more crypto purchases. However, cryptocurrency volatility has been trending down for nearly a decade, and the analysts now warn that if this trend continues, DATs may find it harder to finance further crypto acquisitions.

They suggest that as investor excitement fades and more digital asset products become available, mNAVs, which is also known as market-adjusted net asset values, should therefore “fade because investors can no longer count on most DATs to expand their treasuries consistently.”

Risks and limits

Another trend VanEck analysts highlight is that DATs may actively compress implied volatility by selling options or warrants to generate cash. Saylor confirmed that Strategy would do this “under circumstances where he could not issue shares due to MSTR mNAV <1.”

But the analysts warn that if Bitcoin experiences a prolonged drop, other DATs could also see declining mNAVs. While they might sell options to raise cash, this would reduce implied volatility across the sector, and over time, this could deplete the “volatility well” that DATs rely on to keep buying crypto.

Liquidity, or the lack of it, is another key concern. VanEck analysts note that many new DATs “are encountering […] the lack of deep and liquid markets for the secondary trading of their securities (particularly options).” Without established options markets, DATs must offer large discounts to attract investors, which means their ability to expand treasuries is closely tied to active trading and volatility.

For investors, VanEck analysts suggest the space offers both opportunity and caution. DATs provide a way to gain exposure to digital assets while still participating in traditional markets, using mechanics like discounted warrants and underpriced volatility. But the same structures that make them interesting also make them sensitive to market trends. Falling volatility could limit their growth, reduce mNAVs, and curb opportunities for speculative gains.

Market Opportunity
MAY Logo
MAY Price(MAY)
$0.01246
$0.01246$0.01246
-3.93%
USD
MAY (MAY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00