The post Tokenization Needs Guardrails, Not Just Innovation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Vincent Kadar, CEO of Polymath When a company sold tokenized shares in dozens of homes in Detroit that it did not actually own, it was more than a real estate scandal. It served as a warning to the entire real-world asset (RWA) sector. The deal seemed modern, including blockchain tokens, fractional ownership and the promise of rental income. In reality, however, many properties were vacant, in poor condition or not even legally theirs to sell. The blockchain noted every token transfer smoothly. It lacked the necessary checks that would ensure the assets were real or were earning income. A sector-wide risk This is what happens when innovation outpaces oversight. Tokenization can deliver efficiency, liquidity and broader market access. Without proper protection, long-standing problems can also be exacerbated. While the Detroit case focused on real estate, the same vulnerabilities exist in every category of RWAs. A tokenized bond holds no value if its cash flows are not secured. A tokenized commodity has no value if the underlying asset isn’t stored and verified. Without these protections, the entire process is a house of cards. Tokenization does not guarantee transparency, enforceability or investor protection. It accelerates transactions, meaning bad actors can move just as quickly as legitimate market participants. For traditional markets, it is easy to think that the solution is to pause and review the value of tokenization. Related: What is tokenomics? A beginner’s guide on supply and demand of cryptocurrencies The answer is not to slow down the adoption of tokenization. Instead, the solution is to build systems with trust at the core. That way, bad actors cannot hide, and the risk of fraud can be significantly reduced. An ecosystem of trust When tokenization enters traditional markets, it must adhere to guidelines that foster trust in the market. Transactions… The post Tokenization Needs Guardrails, Not Just Innovation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Vincent Kadar, CEO of Polymath When a company sold tokenized shares in dozens of homes in Detroit that it did not actually own, it was more than a real estate scandal. It served as a warning to the entire real-world asset (RWA) sector. The deal seemed modern, including blockchain tokens, fractional ownership and the promise of rental income. In reality, however, many properties were vacant, in poor condition or not even legally theirs to sell. The blockchain noted every token transfer smoothly. It lacked the necessary checks that would ensure the assets were real or were earning income. A sector-wide risk This is what happens when innovation outpaces oversight. Tokenization can deliver efficiency, liquidity and broader market access. Without proper protection, long-standing problems can also be exacerbated. While the Detroit case focused on real estate, the same vulnerabilities exist in every category of RWAs. A tokenized bond holds no value if its cash flows are not secured. A tokenized commodity has no value if the underlying asset isn’t stored and verified. Without these protections, the entire process is a house of cards. Tokenization does not guarantee transparency, enforceability or investor protection. It accelerates transactions, meaning bad actors can move just as quickly as legitimate market participants. For traditional markets, it is easy to think that the solution is to pause and review the value of tokenization. Related: What is tokenomics? A beginner’s guide on supply and demand of cryptocurrencies The answer is not to slow down the adoption of tokenization. Instead, the solution is to build systems with trust at the core. That way, bad actors cannot hide, and the risk of fraud can be significantly reduced. An ecosystem of trust When tokenization enters traditional markets, it must adhere to guidelines that foster trust in the market. Transactions…

Tokenization Needs Guardrails, Not Just Innovation

Opinion by: Vincent Kadar, CEO of Polymath

When a company sold tokenized shares in dozens of homes in Detroit that it did not actually own, it was more than a real estate scandal. It served as a warning to the entire real-world asset (RWA) sector.

The deal seemed modern, including blockchain tokens, fractional ownership and the promise of rental income.

In reality, however, many properties were vacant, in poor condition or not even legally theirs to sell.

The blockchain noted every token transfer smoothly. It lacked the necessary checks that would ensure the assets were real or were earning income.

A sector-wide risk

This is what happens when innovation outpaces oversight. Tokenization can deliver efficiency, liquidity and broader market access. Without proper protection, long-standing problems can also be exacerbated.

While the Detroit case focused on real estate, the same vulnerabilities exist in every category of RWAs. A tokenized bond holds no value if its cash flows are not secured. A tokenized commodity has no value if the underlying asset isn’t stored and verified. Without these protections, the entire process is a house of cards.

Tokenization does not guarantee transparency, enforceability or investor protection. It accelerates transactions, meaning bad actors can move just as quickly as legitimate market participants. For traditional markets, it is easy to think that the solution is to pause and review the value of tokenization.

Related: What is tokenomics? A beginner’s guide on supply and demand of cryptocurrencies

The answer is not to slow down the adoption of tokenization. Instead, the solution is to build systems with trust at the core. That way, bad actors cannot hide, and the risk of fraud can be significantly reduced.

An ecosystem of trust

When tokenization enters traditional markets, it must adhere to guidelines that foster trust in the market. Transactions should only involve verified participants, and ownership must connect to verified identities, not anonymous wallet addresses. Trading rules should be built into the technology, like who can buy, when to sell and under what conditions. This way, no one can bypass them.

Governance is equally essential. Markets need transparent processes to resolve disputes, recover emergency assets and upgrade systems safely. These are not optional features.

They are necessary if tokenized assets are to attract long-term institutional participation.

When compliance, governance and security are built into the foundation, investors and regulators can see that the system is designed to protect them. Without that trust, even the most advanced technology will struggle to gain lasting adoption.

The opportunity in emerging markets

This challenge isn’t just for developed financial centers. In emerging markets, old infrastructure makes it complicated and expensive to access capital. Tokenization can help overcome these issues. It allows for creating digital, flexible and globally connected markets.

Many economies in these areas already have high mobile usage. There is also growing demand for investment and interest in digital assets. These factors make it an excellent time for tokenization.

This chance could be lost without compliance with local regulations and strong investor protections. Building compliant and globally compatible infrastructure from the start can unlock new growth. It can also prevent the flaws that have held back traditional finance in these regions, such as ambiguous ownership records, slow cross-border settlements, high corruption risk and weak investor protections.

This can be done by directly embedding transparency and secure governance into the market infrastructure.

Responsible growth over hype

Some projects are already heading in the right direction. They use permissioned blockchains designed for regulated assets, adopt token standards that automatically enforce compliance and collaborate with reputable custodians to safeguard the underlying assets. These are not extras added on later. They are the protections that make tokenized markets in areas such as commodities, private credit and property credible to global capital markets.

The potential for real-world assets is enormous. The sector could unlock trillions in value, make markets more inclusive and increase efficiency in issuing and trading assets. Without the proper guardrails, the industry risks damaging trust before it matures.

The priority should not be who can launch the fastest. The real test will be who can create systems that withstand scrutiny for decades. Frameworks are not obstacles to progress. 

They are what make progress sustainable.

Today’s choices will determine whether tokenization delivers on its promise or becomes another missed opportunity.

Opinion by: Vincent Kadar, CEO of Polymath.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/tokenization-guardrails-not-just-innovation?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005463
$0.0005463$0.0005463
+0.45%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00
Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama unveils innovative public token auction, using proprietary encryption. Bidding begins January 21, 2026. Key details on protocol and market impact.Read more
Share
Coinstats2026/01/20 18:13
Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

The federal funds rate now stands in a range of 4.00% to 4.25%, a level that reflects a delicate balancing […] The post Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:01