The post Microsoft could stall Bitcoin development via GitHub appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin developers flagged a user suspension this week by Microsoft’s GitHub as an example of the company’s disconcerting level of control over Bitcoin’s technical architecture. Fortunately, many developers rallied in support of the pseudonymous “grim,” gaining the attention of a GitHub support representative who reactivated them. Nonetheless, the incident highlighted the power of Microsoft to arbitrarily censor the communications and code editing privileges of Bitcoin developers as a serious matter. GitHub’s shortcomings are a frequent complaint by Bitcoin contributors. First of all, software development cycles are time-sensitive. Votes or authorizations are often tallied on GitHub and are actioned within specific windows of time on a scheduled timetable. If GitHub suspends a user, that censorship could cause significant distortion of the consensus-making process between other developers who might not be aware of the suspension. Second, establishing communication elsewhere or coordinating an alternative to GitHub might be impossible for time-sensitive matters. Although a few developers know one another personally through local venues like Chaincode Labs, Bitcoin development is global, distributed, and often pseudonymous community. If GitHub goes down, several international developers would have difficulty trusting a quick transfer of communications to another platform. Indeed, many Bitcoin developers operate under their GitHub username. Although they often host their own website or maintain alternate references, proving the legitimacy of a username transfer on another platform is cumbersome. Microsoft’s power to stall and silence Bitcoin developers GitHub is the world’s largest source code host. Over 150 million users contribute to its repositories. Out of convenience, Bitcoin developers use it to chat, manage tasks, track bugs, request software features, and edit user permissions. Microsoft acquired GitHub in 2018. Even then, developers expressed concern about the level of control the acquisition would give Microsoft over Bitcoin.  In addition to the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list and assorted chat apps… The post Microsoft could stall Bitcoin development via GitHub appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin developers flagged a user suspension this week by Microsoft’s GitHub as an example of the company’s disconcerting level of control over Bitcoin’s technical architecture. Fortunately, many developers rallied in support of the pseudonymous “grim,” gaining the attention of a GitHub support representative who reactivated them. Nonetheless, the incident highlighted the power of Microsoft to arbitrarily censor the communications and code editing privileges of Bitcoin developers as a serious matter. GitHub’s shortcomings are a frequent complaint by Bitcoin contributors. First of all, software development cycles are time-sensitive. Votes or authorizations are often tallied on GitHub and are actioned within specific windows of time on a scheduled timetable. If GitHub suspends a user, that censorship could cause significant distortion of the consensus-making process between other developers who might not be aware of the suspension. Second, establishing communication elsewhere or coordinating an alternative to GitHub might be impossible for time-sensitive matters. Although a few developers know one another personally through local venues like Chaincode Labs, Bitcoin development is global, distributed, and often pseudonymous community. If GitHub goes down, several international developers would have difficulty trusting a quick transfer of communications to another platform. Indeed, many Bitcoin developers operate under their GitHub username. Although they often host their own website or maintain alternate references, proving the legitimacy of a username transfer on another platform is cumbersome. Microsoft’s power to stall and silence Bitcoin developers GitHub is the world’s largest source code host. Over 150 million users contribute to its repositories. Out of convenience, Bitcoin developers use it to chat, manage tasks, track bugs, request software features, and edit user permissions. Microsoft acquired GitHub in 2018. Even then, developers expressed concern about the level of control the acquisition would give Microsoft over Bitcoin.  In addition to the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list and assorted chat apps…

Microsoft could stall Bitcoin development via GitHub

Bitcoin developers flagged a user suspension this week by Microsoft’s GitHub as an example of the company’s disconcerting level of control over Bitcoin’s technical architecture.

Fortunately, many developers rallied in support of the pseudonymous “grim,” gaining the attention of a GitHub support representative who reactivated them.

Nonetheless, the incident highlighted the power of Microsoft to arbitrarily censor the communications and code editing privileges of Bitcoin developers as a serious matter.

GitHub’s shortcomings are a frequent complaint by Bitcoin contributors.

First of all, software development cycles are time-sensitive. Votes or authorizations are often tallied on GitHub and are actioned within specific windows of time on a scheduled timetable.

If GitHub suspends a user, that censorship could cause significant distortion of the consensus-making process between other developers who might not be aware of the suspension.

Second, establishing communication elsewhere or coordinating an alternative to GitHub might be impossible for time-sensitive matters.

Although a few developers know one another personally through local venues like Chaincode Labs, Bitcoin development is global, distributed, and often pseudonymous community.

If GitHub goes down, several international developers would have difficulty trusting a quick transfer of communications to another platform.

Indeed, many Bitcoin developers operate under their GitHub username. Although they often host their own website or maintain alternate references, proving the legitimacy of a username transfer on another platform is cumbersome.

Microsoft’s power to stall and silence Bitcoin developers

GitHub is the world’s largest source code host. Over 150 million users contribute to its repositories. Out of convenience, Bitcoin developers use it to chat, manage tasks, track bugs, request software features, and edit user permissions.

Microsoft acquired GitHub in 2018. Even then, developers expressed concern about the level of control the acquisition would give Microsoft over Bitcoin. 

In addition to the Bitcoin-Dev mailing list and assorted chat apps like Discord and Telegram, GitHub is a dominant venue for Bitcoin work and communication.

Senior maintainers tag versions of Bitcoin Core for release — and binaries are audited for authenticity — using GitHub release histories. 

Although backups exist elsewhere, GitHub is the primary place to verify the editing history of Core software and its pull requests.

Unfortunately, Microsoft also has struggled to keep GitHub clear of bots and spam, with one developer recently complaining about “millions of fake issues and PRs clogging up repos and notifications.”

Read more: Moderators censor Bitcoin devs as OP_RETURN war rages on

Over the years, Bitcoin developers have requested less centralized alternatives like GitLab or BitBucket.

Although the community decided to migrate its Bitcoin-Dev mailing list from Linux to Google Groups — a major migration of communications — no migration away from GitHub has ever gained significant traction.

As a result, Microsoft retains an unsettling amount of power that it has rarely exercised over Bitcoin development.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/microsoft-could-stall-bitcoin-development-via-github/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Bank of Canada cuts rate to 2.5% as tariffs and weak hiring hit economy

Bank of Canada cuts rate to 2.5% as tariffs and weak hiring hit economy

The Bank of Canada lowered its overnight rate to 2.5% on Wednesday, responding to mounting economic damage from US tariffs and a slowdown in hiring. The quarter-point cut was the first since March and met predictions from markets and economists. Governor Tiff Macklem, speaking in Ottawa, said the decision was unanimous. “With a weaker economy […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/17 23:09