Tesla’s $1T CEO pay plan faces fresh pushback from ISS
Tesla Inc. shareholders are being urged by proxy adviser Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) to vote against Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk’s $1 trillion compensation plan, creating a potential hurdle as the board seeks investor backing.
This is the second consecutive year ISS has recommended that shareholders reject a pay package for Musk.
ISS flags concerns over Musk’s $1 trillion pay plan
Musk oversees an overlapping empire of five companies: Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, Neuralink, and the Boring Company. In its report, ISS highlighted concerns over the plan’s size and structure.
In the report, which was part of broader voting guidance it issued Friday, the proxy adviser noted that while one of the main reasons for this award is to retain Musk and push him to invest time on Tesla instead of his other business ventures, there are no explicit requirements to ensure that this will be the case. The proxy firm cited “unmitigated concerns” with the plan’s magnitude and design.
The EV maker pushed back in a post on X, urging shareholders to vote in line with the company’s recommendations, arguing that ISS misunderstood key principles of investing and governance and that it was easy for the proxy adviser to make voting recommendations without having any stake in the outcome.
Tesla defends compensation package ahead of crucial shareholder vote
The pay package, announced in September, was designed to make Musk an integral part of Tesla for the next ten years. To gain access to the full payout and additional voting control, Musk also needs to meet certain ambitious targets, such as Tesla’s market value reaching as high as $8.5 trillion or the carmaker expanding its robotics and robotaxi business. The added shares would bring Musk’s ownership stake in Tesla to at least 25 percent, a proxy filing shows.
Musk has said he may consider products outside of the EV maker should he fail to increase his stake in the firm, a key part of the new proposal. Musk, who remains Tesla’s largest shareholder, sold a material amount of stock in the carmaker to fund his acquisition of Twitter — now known as X and owned by Musk’s company xAI.
Shareholders will vote on the package at Tesla’s annual meeting on Nov. 6. ISS and other proxy advisers often influence major institutional investors, especially those holding stock in passive funds. However, despite ISS and Glass Lewis recommending shareholders reject Musk’s 2018 pay deal, roughly three-quarters still supported it. In 2024, a Delaware judge struck down that plan, citing Musk’s undue influence over the board, prompting Tesla to later relocate its corporate home to Texas.
The current plan, fluctuating in value with Tesla’s stock and now worth more than $100 billion, was put to an advisory vote last year and approved. To partially replace the payment, Tesla’s board granted Musk an interim award in August valued at around $30 billion, which would be forfeited if the original pay package is reinstated. Musk and Tesla resumed their legal fight to appeal the ruling before the Delaware Supreme Court on Oct. 15.
Tesla board chair Robyn Denholm emphasized in September that no one but Musk can run the company. According to reporting from The Wall Street Journal, Robyn launched her pitch ahead of the November 6 shareholder vote, where Tesla is asking investors to approve a new $1 trillion compensation package for Elon.
The intention is to get him to stay locked in for another ten years, but the sales are down, investors are tired, and Tesla’s growth story looks shakier than ever.
Robyn, who’s chaired the EV maker’s board since 2018, has started doing interviews and meeting with big institutional shareholders. This is her second time doing this in under two years. She’s trying to push through a huge payday for Elon, again, with the not-so-subtle message that he could walk if he doesn’t get it.
ISS recommended against awarding Musk backpay under the 2018 plan and urged shareholders to reject a proposal for Tesla to invest in Musk’s AI company, xAI, calling it “a highly unusual proposal both in terms of the request itself and the way it came to be on the ballot.”
Following ISS’s guidance, the electric car giant promoted a video on X to rally shareholder support for the pay plan.
Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
You May Also Like
U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems
- Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
- Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
- Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
- Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
- Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
- Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
