A new report by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) highlights several key factors hindering cross-border co-operation among countries regarding cryptocurrencies. The G20 risk watchdog identified the difference in privacy rules as one such key hurdle. Privacy Rules Hindering Cross-Border Crypto Regulation It has been 16 years since Bitcoin’s (BTC) launch, and financial watchdogs around the […]A new report by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) highlights several key factors hindering cross-border co-operation among countries regarding cryptocurrencies. The G20 risk watchdog identified the difference in privacy rules as one such key hurdle. Privacy Rules Hindering Cross-Border Crypto Regulation It has been 16 years since Bitcoin’s (BTC) launch, and financial watchdogs around the […]

16 Years Later, Crypto Privacy Rules Still Hamper Cross-Border Regulation: G20 Risk Report

A new report by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) highlights several key factors hindering cross-border co-operation among countries regarding cryptocurrencies. The G20 risk watchdog identified the difference in privacy rules as one such key hurdle.

Privacy Rules Hindering Cross-Border Crypto Regulation

It has been 16 years since Bitcoin’s (BTC) launch, and financial watchdogs around the world continue to face problems when trying to access crypto data. According to a recent report by the FSB, privacy laws are complicating efforts to access such data.

In a detailed 107-page long peer reviewed report, the G20 risk regulator remarked that privacy of data remains a crucial bottleneck that is hindering cross-border cooperation in regulating digital assets such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and stablecoins.

It is worth highlighting that the FSB is funded by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), and works as a global financial authority that monitors and makes recommendations about the evolving global financial system.

The FSB has found several major gaps in how governments of different countries around the world regulate the digital assets market. The authority said that these gaps lead to second-order challenges, including regulatory arbitrage, data gaps, and market fragmentation. It added:

The FSB noted that crypto supervision and enforcement efforts tend to lag behind regulatory development, with many jurisdictions yet to implement the tools necessary for ensuring compliance and oversight.

According to the FSB, the issue of data confidentiality remains a major concern in identifying potential systemic risks and, in turn, supervising cross-border crypto asset activities. Specifically, secrecy or data privacy laws are likely to pose significant barriers to co-operation.

Further, the FSB remarked that a good chunk of users are reluctant to share confidential information due to risks of data breaches and the lack of guaranteed reciprocity. The report shares the following table highlighting the implementation status of the FSB’s policy recommendations.

fsb

Little Progress Made By G20

In 2023, the G20 – a group of countries comprising the 20 major global economies – pledged to establish a unified crypto regulatory framework. At the time, the body asked its member countries to share information to better regulate the emerging asset class.

However, little progress has been made since then. The challenges remain the same, if not more complicated, due to the rapid pace of advances in the crypto industry. One G20 member country, India, recently delayed releasing its crypto framework over systemic risk concerns.

Meanwhile, the FSB recently stated that it will take measures to address stablecoin-related risks. At press time, BTC trades at $106,727, down 1.2% in the past 24 hours.

bitcoin
Market Opportunity
CROSS Logo
CROSS Price(CROSS)
$0.13475
$0.13475$0.13475
+0.68%
USD
CROSS (CROSS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30