The post How crypto-native leverage drove Bitcoin sell-off while ETFs barely flinched appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. JPMorgan attributes the recent Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) sell-off to crypto-native leverage rather than institutional exits, noting that spot ETFs and CME futures absorbed minimal forced selling while perpetual futures markets faced sharp deleveraging across both assets. Bitcoin fell 13.1% from $122,316 on Oct. 3 to $106,329 by Oct. 17, while perpetual open interest dropped from approximately $70 billion to $58 billion on Oct. 10. This $12 billion decline signals forced liquidations rather than orderly position exits. Farside Investors’ data shows that Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $70.4 million in net outflows concentrated on Oct. 14, 15, and 16, minimal compared to the scale of the price move and the leverage flush in derivatives markets. Ethereum saw even more severe deleveraging relative to its market size. Perpetual open interest fell from roughly $28 billion to between $19 billion and $20 billion on Oct. 10, representing a $9 billion to $10 billion drop. Ethereum spot ETFs recorded $668.9 million in net outflows across Oct. 9, 10, 13, and 16, nearly 9.5 times Bitcoin ETF outflows, with concentrated redemptions on Oct. 10 and Oct. 13. Despite the larger institutional response in Ethereum ETFs, JPMorgan concluded that perpetual futures deleveraging drove price action in both assets, with ETF flows showing “little forced selling” relative to the derivatives cascade. The data support the bank’s thesis. Ethereum’s open interest declined by roughly 35%, while Bitcoin’s fell by approximately 17%. However, both assets experienced a coordinated sell-off on Oct. 10 as leverage unwound across crypto-native venues. Metric Window (UTC) BTC ETH Notes US spot ETF net flows (US$m) Oct 3–16, 2025 +3,406.9 +745.9 Sum of Farside daily “Total” for each date; Oct. 17 shows no entry. CME futures OI variation Oct 9 → Oct 10, 2025 ~flat to low-single-digit dip down; heavier than BTC Coverage indicates… The post How crypto-native leverage drove Bitcoin sell-off while ETFs barely flinched appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. JPMorgan attributes the recent Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) sell-off to crypto-native leverage rather than institutional exits, noting that spot ETFs and CME futures absorbed minimal forced selling while perpetual futures markets faced sharp deleveraging across both assets. Bitcoin fell 13.1% from $122,316 on Oct. 3 to $106,329 by Oct. 17, while perpetual open interest dropped from approximately $70 billion to $58 billion on Oct. 10. This $12 billion decline signals forced liquidations rather than orderly position exits. Farside Investors’ data shows that Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $70.4 million in net outflows concentrated on Oct. 14, 15, and 16, minimal compared to the scale of the price move and the leverage flush in derivatives markets. Ethereum saw even more severe deleveraging relative to its market size. Perpetual open interest fell from roughly $28 billion to between $19 billion and $20 billion on Oct. 10, representing a $9 billion to $10 billion drop. Ethereum spot ETFs recorded $668.9 million in net outflows across Oct. 9, 10, 13, and 16, nearly 9.5 times Bitcoin ETF outflows, with concentrated redemptions on Oct. 10 and Oct. 13. Despite the larger institutional response in Ethereum ETFs, JPMorgan concluded that perpetual futures deleveraging drove price action in both assets, with ETF flows showing “little forced selling” relative to the derivatives cascade. The data support the bank’s thesis. Ethereum’s open interest declined by roughly 35%, while Bitcoin’s fell by approximately 17%. However, both assets experienced a coordinated sell-off on Oct. 10 as leverage unwound across crypto-native venues. Metric Window (UTC) BTC ETH Notes US spot ETF net flows (US$m) Oct 3–16, 2025 +3,406.9 +745.9 Sum of Farside daily “Total” for each date; Oct. 17 shows no entry. CME futures OI variation Oct 9 → Oct 10, 2025 ~flat to low-single-digit dip down; heavier than BTC Coverage indicates…

How crypto-native leverage drove Bitcoin sell-off while ETFs barely flinched

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

JPMorgan attributes the recent Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) sell-off to crypto-native leverage rather than institutional exits, noting that spot ETFs and CME futures absorbed minimal forced selling while perpetual futures markets faced sharp deleveraging across both assets.

Bitcoin fell 13.1% from $122,316 on Oct. 3 to $106,329 by Oct. 17, while perpetual open interest dropped from approximately $70 billion to $58 billion on Oct. 10. This $12 billion decline signals forced liquidations rather than orderly position exits.

Farside Investors’ data shows that Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $70.4 million in net outflows concentrated on Oct. 14, 15, and 16, minimal compared to the scale of the price move and the leverage flush in derivatives markets.

Ethereum saw even more severe deleveraging relative to its market size. Perpetual open interest fell from roughly $28 billion to between $19 billion and $20 billion on Oct. 10, representing a $9 billion to $10 billion drop.

Ethereum spot ETFs recorded $668.9 million in net outflows across Oct. 9, 10, 13, and 16, nearly 9.5 times Bitcoin ETF outflows, with concentrated redemptions on Oct. 10 and Oct. 13.

Despite the larger institutional response in Ethereum ETFs, JPMorgan concluded that perpetual futures deleveraging drove price action in both assets, with ETF flows showing “little forced selling” relative to the derivatives cascade.

The data support the bank’s thesis. Ethereum’s open interest declined by roughly 35%, while Bitcoin’s fell by approximately 17%. However, both assets experienced a coordinated sell-off on Oct. 10 as leverage unwound across crypto-native venues.

Metric Window (UTC) BTC ETH Notes
US spot ETF net flows (US$m) Oct 3–16, 2025 +3,406.9 +745.9 Sum of Farside daily “Total” for each date; Oct. 17 shows no entry.
CME futures OI variation Oct 9 → Oct 10, 2025 ~flat to low-single-digit dip down; heavier than BTC Coverage indicates CME BTC OI stayed broadly stable during the flush, while ETH saw more unwinding; exact daily CME OI deltas aren’t published.
Aggregate perp OI change (notional) Oct 10–11, 2025 (24–48h) ≈ −40% ≈ −40% Market-wide deleveraging across perpetuals per Kaiko/JPMorgan; aligns with contemporaneous reporting.

Perpetual flush mechanics

Perpetual futures exaggerate moves because leverage forces trades. When prices break, margin ratios slip, and exchanges liquidate under-margined positions with market orders that hit thin books and trigger reflexive cascades.

Cross-margin amplifies the dynamic, as collateral marked to market shrinks as the asset falls, forcing accounts that appeared safe to breach maintenance thresholds and add more forced flow.

Funding rates offer the fastest tell. During a down flush, perpetuals typically flip to sustained negative rates with the perpetual trading at a discount to the spot index.

The turn arrives when funding grinds back toward zero while the perpetual premium or discount closes, ideally with price stabilizing on rising spot volume rather than perpetual activity alone.

Open interest provides the second pillar. A sharp drop in aggregate open interest alongside the sell-off means leverage left the system instead of rotating to new shorts.

Bitcoin’s 17% decline and Ethereum’s 35% decline in open interest both point to genuine deleveraging.

A constructive rebuild is slow and spot-led. Prices recover or remain at the base level while open interest rises modestly, funding stays near flat, and the perpetual basis remains tight.

A durable bottom after a perpetual flush looks like negative funding reverting toward zero, the perpetual discount closing, open interest resetting and rebuilding gradually, and the futures curve lifting back into mild contango.

Bitcoin Market Data

At the time of press 2:54 pm UTC on Oct. 18, 2025, Bitcoin is ranked #1 by market cap and the price is up 1.36% over the past 24 hours. Bitcoin has a market capitalization of $2.13 trillion with a 24-hour trading volume of $59.87 billion. Learn more about Bitcoin ›

Crypto Market Summary

At the time of press 2:54 pm UTC on Oct. 18, 2025, the total crypto market is valued at at $3.62 trillion with a 24-hour volume of $156.36 billion. Bitcoin dominance is currently at 58.82%. Learn more about the crypto market ›

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/how-crypto-native-leverage-drove-bitcoin-sell-off-while-etfs-barely-flinched/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$69,782.51
$69,782.51$69,782.51
-2.18%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

The post ‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Critics have hailed Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio, as a “masterpiece,” indicating potential Academy Awards success as it boasts near-perfect scores on review aggregators Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes based on early reviews. Leonardo DiCaprio stars in “One Battle After Another,” which opens in theaters next week. (Photo by Jeff Spicer/Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures) Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures Key Facts “One Battle After Another” boasts a nearly perfect 97 out of a possible 100 on Metacritic based on its first 31 reviews, making it the highest-rated movie of this decade on Metacritic’s best movies of all time list. The movie also has a 96% score on Rotten Tomatoes based on the first 56 reviews, with only two reviews considered “rotten,” or negative. The Associated Press hailed the movie as “an American masterpiece,” noting the movie touches on topical political themes and depicts a society where “gun violence, white power and immigrant deportations recur in an ongoing dance, both farcical and tragic.” The movie stars DiCaprio as an ex-revolutionary who reunites with former accomplices to rescue his 16-year-old daughter when she goes missing, and Anderson has said the movie was inspired by the 1990 novel, “Vineland.” Most critics have described the movie as an action thriller with notable chase scenes, which jumps in time from DiCaprio’s character’s early days with fictional revolutionary group, the French 75, to about 15 years later, when he is pursued by foe and military leader Captain Steven Lockjaw, played by Sean Penn. The Warner Bros.-produced film was made on a big budget, estimated to be between $130 million and $175 million, and co-stars Penn, Benicio del Toro, Regina Hall and Teyana Taylor. When Will ‘one Battle After Another’ Open In Theaters And Streaming? The move opens in…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:35
What is Opinion, the project that's been making headlines lately? A 3-minute guide to understanding this new prediction market project.

What is Opinion, the project that's been making headlines lately? A 3-minute guide to understanding this new prediction market project.

CoinW Research Institute summary Recently, the prediction market sector has seen a surge in attention. Opinion, one of the most watched projects, attempts to transform
Share
PANews2026/03/11 08:33
The Importance of SEO for Businesses in Saskatoon

The Importance of SEO for Businesses in Saskatoon

In today’s competitive digital landscape, simply having a website is not enough. Businesses must ensure their websites are visible to potential customers who are
Share
Techbullion2026/03/11 08:25