The CEO of StarkWare sounds an alarm that corporate blockchains will not succeed without adopting the concept of decentralization and self-custody, which is the main idea of crypto.  Co-founder and CEO of StarkWare, Eli Ben-Sasson, tightened his grip on the future of blockchains in companies.  Ben-Sasson reiterated in recent remarks on X that corporately-created and […] The post Blockchain News: Corpo Chains’ Doom Looms Without Crypto Ethos Shift appeared first on Live Bitcoin News. The CEO of StarkWare sounds an alarm that corporate blockchains will not succeed without adopting the concept of decentralization and self-custody, which is the main idea of crypto.  Co-founder and CEO of StarkWare, Eli Ben-Sasson, tightened his grip on the future of blockchains in companies.  Ben-Sasson reiterated in recent remarks on X that corporately-created and […] The post Blockchain News: Corpo Chains’ Doom Looms Without Crypto Ethos Shift appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Blockchain News: Corpo Chains’ Doom Looms Without Crypto Ethos Shift

2025/10/22 13:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

 The CEO of StarkWare sounds an alarm that corporate blockchains will not succeed without adopting the concept of decentralization and self-custody, which is the main idea of crypto. 

Co-founder and CEO of StarkWare, Eli Ben-Sasson, tightened his grip on the future of blockchains in companies. 

Ben-Sasson reiterated in recent remarks on X that corporately-created and operated blockchains are unlikely to survive. 

Source- X 

He stressed that the most important aspect of blockchain is the elimination of central actors to empower the users. 

Otherwise, it can be concluded that corpo chains will become obsolete as users will move to networks where they can enjoy the benefits of self-custody and control of their assets. 

Even with complicated technology, such as account abstraction to make the user experience simpler, the main principle of decentralization of blockchain cannot be compromised.​

Ben-Sasson noted that while corporate chains may ease blockchain’s intimidation and encourage short-term adoption, they offer a grim long-term future.

The failure of these chains to provide the actual user value of decentralized finance (DeFi) and self-custody advantages will turn into technical headaches and corporate disinterest. 

The more users insist on the ability to control their assets, the less corporations implement chains that keep them centrally controlled, leaving behind costly yet unappealing infrastructure.​

Decentralization or Death: The Blockchain Imperative

By introducing the ethos of blockchain, Bitcoin aims to reform centralized finance and give power back to the people.

Corporate-controlled blockchains do not align with this core idea as they put the control in the hands of the corporation. 

Ben-Sasson described non-decentralized blockchains as inferior technologies with no future or practical use.

The emergence and subsequent decline of corporate blockchain initiatives in trade and finance are a good illustration of this quandary, with numerous platforms having returned to conventional central databases due to reasons of efficiency, which reflects how challenging it is to ensure corporate power on-chain.​

This black and white contrast raises controversy in the crypto community. Some say that corporate chains would perform well by catering to its own owning companies, but this would not provide a participation incentive to users. 

This opinion of Ben-Sasson shows a certain kind of growing distrust of corporate chains as the crypto community places more emphasis on DeFi, self-custody, and permissionless innovation. 

The corporate blockchain model should transform to adopt these principles or become obsolete.​

The post Blockchain News: Corpo Chains’ Doom Looms Without Crypto Ethos Shift appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003721
$0.0003721$0.0003721
+0.67%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

TLDR South Korea introduced new custody rules after police lost seized Bitcoin worth $1.4 million. The Finance Minister confirmed a full inspection of digital asset
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 01:00
Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday against the state of Michigan over its refusal to share voter rolls
Share
Alternet2026/03/03 01:25