Early this morning Beijing time, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate range to 4.00%–4.25%. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also stated that quantitative tightening (QT) will officially end on December 1. Logically, this should have been a "positive" development: interest rate cuts, the end of balance sheet reduction, and improved liquidity expectations. However, the result has left many puzzled—why didn't the stock market, cryptocurrencies, or even gold rise, but instead experienced widespread declines? 01. The market's "positive expectations" have already been exhausted. In fact, the market had already "bet" on this rate cut earlier this month. According to CME FedWatch data, prior to the meeting, the market believed: The probability of a 25bp rate cut is as high as 95%, and about 40% of investors expect the Federal Reserve to immediately announce the start of QE (re-expansion of the balance sheet). As a result, the Federal Reserve opted for a "moderate" rate cut. in other words: This interest rate cut is not a "new positive development," but rather "below expectations." When expectations are met but there are no surprises, the market often chooses to take profits. This is a typical "buy the rumor, sell the news" market trend. 02. Stopping the meter reading does not mean starting to release water. Many people, seeing "QT ended," assumed it meant a massive influx of liquidity was coming. However, the Federal Reserve's statement this time was actually very cautious: "We will end the balance sheet reduction, but will not launch a new asset purchase program for the time being." That is to say: The market has shifted from the "collecting water" phase to the "wait and see" phase. In the language of financial markets, this is called: Liquidity has stopped worsening, but it hasn't improved either. For the investment market to rise, simply "stopping the decline" is not enough—it also needs "increased capital." This is currently the biggest gap. 03. The interest rate cut has not translated into "real funding rates". In theory, interest rate cuts should lower short-term rates, leading to lower funding costs. However, this situation is somewhat unusual—although the nominal policy rate has decreased by 25 basis points, medium- and long-term funding costs have not decreased accordingly. For example, the yield on five-year Treasury bonds rose from 3.6% to 3.7%. The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has surged to over 4%. What does this mean? It means that real liquidity in the market remains tight, and investment institutions have not felt an increase in "money." The Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts are still just talk and haven't actually "flowed into the market." 04. Hidden Concerns Behind the "Interest Rate Cut": Downward Economic Pressure Remains High From a broader perspective, the Federal Reserve's rate cut is actually a "defensive measure." Recent US economic data shows: The real estate and manufacturing sectors experienced negative growth for two consecutive quarters. The job market slowed, and the unemployment rate rose again to 4.6%. Corporate profit growth has almost stagnated. This means that the Federal Reserve has opted for a slight easing of monetary policy to buffer downside risks, choosing between "maintaining growth" and "controlling inflation." But this operation also sends a signal: The US economy may have entered a period of "slow decline". In this situation, the market prefers to lock in profits rather than easily increase its holdings in risky assets. 05. Summary: Interest rate cuts ≠ bull market; liquidity is the core variable. The market's reaction to this interest rate cut actually reveals the clearest logic: Short-term policy easing ≠ ample liquidity ≠ asset price increases. What could truly drive a full-blown reversal in the stock and crypto markets is the central bank restarting asset expansion (QE), or fiscal stimulus coupled with large-scale capital inflows. Before that, interest rate cuts were only "neutral to slightly positive"—enough to stabilize confidence, but not enough to trigger a new bull market. What the market wants is not a 25-point interest rate cut, but a real injection of liquidity. Until then, 'risky assets' will have to wait. Early this morning Beijing time, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate range to 4.00%–4.25%. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also stated that quantitative tightening (QT) will officially end on December 1. Logically, this should have been a "positive" development: interest rate cuts, the end of balance sheet reduction, and improved liquidity expectations. However, the result has left many puzzled—why didn't the stock market, cryptocurrencies, or even gold rise, but instead experienced widespread declines? 01. The market's "positive expectations" have already been exhausted. In fact, the market had already "bet" on this rate cut earlier this month. According to CME FedWatch data, prior to the meeting, the market believed: The probability of a 25bp rate cut is as high as 95%, and about 40% of investors expect the Federal Reserve to immediately announce the start of QE (re-expansion of the balance sheet). As a result, the Federal Reserve opted for a "moderate" rate cut. in other words: This interest rate cut is not a "new positive development," but rather "below expectations." When expectations are met but there are no surprises, the market often chooses to take profits. This is a typical "buy the rumor, sell the news" market trend. 02. Stopping the meter reading does not mean starting to release water. Many people, seeing "QT ended," assumed it meant a massive influx of liquidity was coming. However, the Federal Reserve's statement this time was actually very cautious: "We will end the balance sheet reduction, but will not launch a new asset purchase program for the time being." That is to say: The market has shifted from the "collecting water" phase to the "wait and see" phase. In the language of financial markets, this is called: Liquidity has stopped worsening, but it hasn't improved either. For the investment market to rise, simply "stopping the decline" is not enough—it also needs "increased capital." This is currently the biggest gap. 03. The interest rate cut has not translated into "real funding rates". In theory, interest rate cuts should lower short-term rates, leading to lower funding costs. However, this situation is somewhat unusual—although the nominal policy rate has decreased by 25 basis points, medium- and long-term funding costs have not decreased accordingly. For example, the yield on five-year Treasury bonds rose from 3.6% to 3.7%. The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has surged to over 4%. What does this mean? It means that real liquidity in the market remains tight, and investment institutions have not felt an increase in "money." The Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts are still just talk and haven't actually "flowed into the market." 04. Hidden Concerns Behind the "Interest Rate Cut": Downward Economic Pressure Remains High From a broader perspective, the Federal Reserve's rate cut is actually a "defensive measure." Recent US economic data shows: The real estate and manufacturing sectors experienced negative growth for two consecutive quarters. The job market slowed, and the unemployment rate rose again to 4.6%. Corporate profit growth has almost stagnated. This means that the Federal Reserve has opted for a slight easing of monetary policy to buffer downside risks, choosing between "maintaining growth" and "controlling inflation." But this operation also sends a signal: The US economy may have entered a period of "slow decline". In this situation, the market prefers to lock in profits rather than easily increase its holdings in risky assets. 05. Summary: Interest rate cuts ≠ bull market; liquidity is the core variable. The market's reaction to this interest rate cut actually reveals the clearest logic: Short-term policy easing ≠ ample liquidity ≠ asset price increases. What could truly drive a full-blown reversal in the stock and crypto markets is the central bank restarting asset expansion (QE), or fiscal stimulus coupled with large-scale capital inflows. Before that, interest rate cuts were only "neutral to slightly positive"—enough to stabilize confidence, but not enough to trigger a new bull market. What the market wants is not a 25-point interest rate cut, but a real injection of liquidity. Until then, 'risky assets' will have to wait.

Why is the market still falling even after interest rates have been cut?

2025/10/30 10:00

Early this morning Beijing time, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate range to 4.00%–4.25%.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also stated that quantitative tightening (QT) will officially end on December 1.

Logically, this should have been a "positive" development: interest rate cuts, the end of balance sheet reduction, and improved liquidity expectations. However, the result has left many puzzled—why didn't the stock market, cryptocurrencies, or even gold rise, but instead experienced widespread declines?

01. The market's "positive expectations" have already been exhausted.

In fact, the market had already "bet" on this rate cut earlier this month. According to CME FedWatch data, prior to the meeting, the market believed:

The probability of a 25bp rate cut is as high as 95%, and about 40% of investors expect the Federal Reserve to immediately announce the start of QE (re-expansion of the balance sheet).

As a result, the Federal Reserve opted for a "moderate" rate cut.

in other words:

This interest rate cut is not a "new positive development," but rather "below expectations."

When expectations are met but there are no surprises, the market often chooses to take profits. This is a typical "buy the rumor, sell the news" market trend.

02. Stopping the meter reading does not mean starting to release water.

Many people, seeing "QT ended," assumed it meant a massive influx of liquidity was coming. However, the Federal Reserve's statement this time was actually very cautious:

"We will end the balance sheet reduction, but will not launch a new asset purchase program for the time being."

That is to say:

The market has shifted from the "collecting water" phase to the "wait and see" phase.

In the language of financial markets, this is called:

Liquidity has stopped worsening, but it hasn't improved either.

For the investment market to rise, simply "stopping the decline" is not enough—it also needs "increased capital." This is currently the biggest gap.

03. The interest rate cut has not translated into "real funding rates".

In theory, interest rate cuts should lower short-term rates, leading to lower funding costs. However, this situation is somewhat unusual—although the nominal policy rate has decreased by 25 basis points, medium- and long-term funding costs have not decreased accordingly.

For example, the yield on five-year Treasury bonds rose from 3.6% to 3.7%.

The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has surged to over 4%.

What does this mean? It means that real liquidity in the market remains tight, and investment institutions have not felt an increase in "money." The Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts are still just talk and haven't actually "flowed into the market."

04. Hidden Concerns Behind the "Interest Rate Cut": Downward Economic Pressure Remains High

From a broader perspective, the Federal Reserve's rate cut is actually a "defensive measure." Recent US economic data shows:

  • The real estate and manufacturing sectors experienced negative growth for two consecutive quarters.
  • The job market slowed, and the unemployment rate rose again to 4.6%.
  • Corporate profit growth has almost stagnated.

This means that the Federal Reserve has opted for a slight easing of monetary policy to buffer downside risks, choosing between "maintaining growth" and "controlling inflation."

But this operation also sends a signal:

The US economy may have entered a period of "slow decline".

In this situation, the market prefers to lock in profits rather than easily increase its holdings in risky assets.

05. Summary: Interest rate cuts ≠ bull market; liquidity is the core variable.

The market's reaction to this interest rate cut actually reveals the clearest logic:

Short-term policy easing ≠ ample liquidity ≠ asset price increases.

What could truly drive a full-blown reversal in the stock and crypto markets is the central bank restarting asset expansion (QE), or fiscal stimulus coupled with large-scale capital inflows.

Before that, interest rate cuts were only "neutral to slightly positive"—enough to stabilize confidence, but not enough to trigger a new bull market.

What the market wants is not a 25-point interest rate cut, but a real injection of liquidity.

Until then, 'risky assets' will have to wait.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001619
$0.00000001619$0.00000001619
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00