Appeals court rules Custodia is not entitled to a Fed master account, affirming earlier decision by Wyoming district court.   The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has ruled that Custodia is not entitled to a Federal Reserve master account. This decision affirms a 2023 ruling from the U.S. District Court for the […] The post Crypto News Today: Appeals Court Upholds Denial of Fed Master Account to Custodia appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.Appeals court rules Custodia is not entitled to a Fed master account, affirming earlier decision by Wyoming district court.   The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has ruled that Custodia is not entitled to a Federal Reserve master account. This decision affirms a 2023 ruling from the U.S. District Court for the […] The post Crypto News Today: Appeals Court Upholds Denial of Fed Master Account to Custodia appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Crypto News Today: Appeals Court Upholds Denial of Fed Master Account to Custodia

Appeals court rules Custodia is not entitled to a Fed master account, affirming earlier decision by Wyoming district court.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has ruled that Custodia is not entitled to a Federal Reserve master account. This decision affirms a 2023 ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming, ending Custodia’s ongoing legal effort to gain direct access to the Fed’s payment systems.

Court Confirms Fed’s Discretion Over Master Account Access

In the court filing issued Friday, the Tenth Circuit stated that Custodia is not “automatically entitled to a master account.” The court affirmed the lower court’s judgment, siding fully with the Federal Reserve on the matter.

Judge Scott Skavdahl had previously ruled that the Federal Reserve has full discretion to approve or deny master account applications. This means the Fed is not required to grant access, even if the applicant meets technical requirements.

Custodia’s legal battle began after its application for a master account was delayed. The bank then sued the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Kansas City Fed in 2022, claiming prolonged inaction.

Custodia, a Wyoming-based special purpose depository institution (SPDI), applied for a master account with the Kansas City Fed in 2020. By 2021, the Federal Reserve Board stepped in and took over the decision-making process.

The bank argued that the delay was unjustified and challenged the Fed’s authority in court. However, both district and appellate courts have now confirmed that access to a master account is not guaranteed by law.

Custodia’s structure as an SPDI requires it to hold 100% reserves and prohibits it from lending customer fiat deposits. This model differs from traditional banks, which operate on a fractional reserve system.

Fed Governor Mentions Future Options for Payment Innovators

Earlier this month, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller referenced the possibility of a “skinny master account” during a public statement. He said such a model might suit entities focused on payment innovation, although no details have been formalized.

While Waller did not name Custodia, the concept of a limited-access account has drawn interest from firms in the digital asset sector. These accounts would provide access to the Fed’s payment system without the broader privileges of a full banking license.

Custodia has not issued a comment regarding the appeals court decision at the time of writing. The ruling adds clarity to the Federal Reserve’s authority in deciding which institutions gain direct access to central banking infrastructure.

The post Crypto News Today: Appeals Court Upholds Denial of Fed Master Account to Custodia appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005548
$0.0005548$0.0005548
-0.25%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.