The post Breaking Down The Top 20 College Basketball Stars’ 2025 NIL Tax Bills appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SALT LAKE CITY, UT – OCTOBER 24: AJ Dybantsa #3 of the Brigham Young Cougars is pressured by Jarin Stevenson #15 of the North Carolina Tar Heels during the second half of their exhibition game at the Delta Center on October 24, 2025 in Salt Lake City, Utah. (Photo by Chris Gardner/Getty Images) Getty Images The 2025-2026 college basketball season kicks off on November 3. The defending champion Florida Gators will give their title defense an early test against the mighty Arizona Wildcats. To help increase the Gators’ chance of a repeat, they have recruited elite transfer point guard Boogie Fland to join their squad. Unique to Fland is that On3 estimates his NIL valuation to be $2.1 million. According to SI.com, aggregate NIL payments are skyrocketing, as high as $2 billion. This article discusses the taxation of NIL and breaks down the Top 20 College Basketball players’ NIL and their corresponding tax liability associated with their earnings. The Taxation Of NIL Following landmark U.S. Federal Court decisions in O’Bannon vs. NCAA and NCAA vs. Alston, the NCAA was left in a situation where it could no longer prevent athletes from being paid for their name, image, and likeness – often abbreviated as NIL. Starting on July 1, 2025, the NCAA officially allowed athletes to be paid for their NIL without the athletes having to sacrifice their amateurism. While many athletes welcomed this change, it also meant that they would now be subject to income taxation for these payments. According to Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, gross income is defined as all income from whatever source derived. While NIL is not explicitly listed as an example, the nature, extent, and timing of this compensation squarely fall within the definition. As I previously reported in a Forbes contributor piece,… The post Breaking Down The Top 20 College Basketball Stars’ 2025 NIL Tax Bills appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SALT LAKE CITY, UT – OCTOBER 24: AJ Dybantsa #3 of the Brigham Young Cougars is pressured by Jarin Stevenson #15 of the North Carolina Tar Heels during the second half of their exhibition game at the Delta Center on October 24, 2025 in Salt Lake City, Utah. (Photo by Chris Gardner/Getty Images) Getty Images The 2025-2026 college basketball season kicks off on November 3. The defending champion Florida Gators will give their title defense an early test against the mighty Arizona Wildcats. To help increase the Gators’ chance of a repeat, they have recruited elite transfer point guard Boogie Fland to join their squad. Unique to Fland is that On3 estimates his NIL valuation to be $2.1 million. According to SI.com, aggregate NIL payments are skyrocketing, as high as $2 billion. This article discusses the taxation of NIL and breaks down the Top 20 College Basketball players’ NIL and their corresponding tax liability associated with their earnings. The Taxation Of NIL Following landmark U.S. Federal Court decisions in O’Bannon vs. NCAA and NCAA vs. Alston, the NCAA was left in a situation where it could no longer prevent athletes from being paid for their name, image, and likeness – often abbreviated as NIL. Starting on July 1, 2025, the NCAA officially allowed athletes to be paid for their NIL without the athletes having to sacrifice their amateurism. While many athletes welcomed this change, it also meant that they would now be subject to income taxation for these payments. According to Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, gross income is defined as all income from whatever source derived. While NIL is not explicitly listed as an example, the nature, extent, and timing of this compensation squarely fall within the definition. As I previously reported in a Forbes contributor piece,…

Breaking Down The Top 20 College Basketball Stars’ 2025 NIL Tax Bills

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

SALT LAKE CITY, UT – OCTOBER 24: AJ Dybantsa #3 of the Brigham Young Cougars is pressured by Jarin Stevenson #15 of the North Carolina Tar Heels during the second half of their exhibition game at the Delta Center on October 24, 2025 in Salt Lake City, Utah. (Photo by Chris Gardner/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The 2025-2026 college basketball season kicks off on November 3. The defending champion Florida Gators will give their title defense an early test against the mighty Arizona Wildcats. To help increase the Gators’ chance of a repeat, they have recruited elite transfer point guard Boogie Fland to join their squad. Unique to Fland is that On3 estimates his NIL valuation to be $2.1 million. According to SI.com, aggregate NIL payments are skyrocketing, as high as $2 billion. This article discusses the taxation of NIL and breaks down the Top 20 College Basketball players’ NIL and their corresponding tax liability associated with their earnings.


The Taxation Of NIL

Following landmark U.S. Federal Court decisions in O’Bannon vs. NCAA and NCAA vs. Alston, the NCAA was left in a situation where it could no longer prevent athletes from being paid for their name, image, and likeness – often abbreviated as NIL. Starting on July 1, 2025, the NCAA officially allowed athletes to be paid for their NIL without the athletes having to sacrifice their amateurism.

While many athletes welcomed this change, it also meant that they would now be subject to income taxation for these payments. According to Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, gross income is defined as all income from whatever source derived. While NIL is not explicitly listed as an example, the nature, extent, and timing of this compensation squarely fall within the definition.

As I previously reported in a Forbes contributor piece, this compensation can vary anywhere from payments for explicit services being provided – autograph sessions, commercials, endorsements – all the way to compensation in-kind. For instance, if an athlete receives use of a car as part of their NIL, the cost of using that car that the athlete does not have to pay is considered income. The athlete will then have to pay taxes on that income, even though the athlete is not being explicitly paid.

ForbesBreaking Down The Top 20 College Football Stars’ 2025 NIL Tax Bills

Different from pro athletes, college players are not necessarily subject to the “jock tax”. As I previously discussed in a Forbes contributor article, pro athletes are paid on a contract, and that contract is allocated to all of their days working in each of the different states, meaning that pro athletes are often subject to tax across many different jurisdictions with varying tax rates. On the contrary, college athletes’ NIL payments are not directly linked to their athletic performance, meaning that the athlete likely only needs to pay taxes in the jurisdiction where the money was earned, often the state in which their school is located.

ForbesNBA Players Earn More — Or Less — Depending On Jock Tax

Top 20 College Basketball NIL Valuations In 2025-2026

On3 provides an algorithm that estimates an athlete’s NIL valuation. Of note, this is not an exact amount as NIL deals are typically not disclosed publicly. However, their valuations provide a baseline estimation for what some of the top college athletes can expect to earn over the next 12 months.

Below is a table that outlines On3’s top 20 highest compensated college basketball NIL valuations for the 2025-2026 season. Using the data from On3, I estimate the athletes’ Federal Income Taxes owed, State Income Taxes owed, and total income tax bill. Notably, in this table, NIL valuations are treated as taxable income, meaning they do not factor in any possible deductions for business expenses or personal deductions (for example, the standard or itemized deduction). The calculations treat all athletes as single taxpayers with no dependents. The calculations are also assuming all income is earned in 2025. Lastly, this table does not include any consideration for other types of taxes like property, sales, and jock taxes. Instead, it focuses entirely on income taxes.

NIL Tax – College BBall

NIL Tax – College BBall

Freshman AJ Dybantsa Leads The Way With $4.1 Million NIL Valuation

Freshman Forward AJ Dybantsa leads the way with the highest NIL valuation. With an estimated value of $4.1 million, I estimate that his earnings after income taxes will amount to over $2.4 million. These taxes include Federal income taxes of $1,474,187 and Utah state income taxes of $186,550 (4.55% tax on all income earned). Dybantsa’s NIL valuation is over a million dollars more than the next highest NIL valuation, making him clearly the highest paid player in college basketball this season even after accounting for his tax bill.

Non-Blue Bloods Are Driving The Top Of The NIL

Only two of the top 15 NIL recruits comes from a team traditionally heralded as a college basketball “blue blood” – Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, North Carolina, and UCLA. This notion holds true even if one were to use a more expansive list of blue bloods to include teams like Arizona, Indiana, Michigan State, UCONN, and Villanova. What this highlights is the growing trend that athletes are preferring to play for the more traditional powers at lower NIL over teams that might be able to pay more but have less historical prestige.

The Rise Of St. John’s NIL Money And The High New York State Income Tax Rate

A team that has risen in popularity in the NIL era has been St. John’s University. Located in New York, St. John’s has the benefit of playing home games in the famed Madison Square Garden. However, comes at a steep cost to it’s players when it comes to taxes. For instance, Bryce Hopkins has a 2025 NIL valuation of $1.7 million and will owe an estimated $586,1187 in Federal income taxes along with $131,541 in New York state income taxes. In comparison, Oscar Cluff of Purdue University has the same NIL valuation, but he will take home almost $100,000 more due to paying significantly less in income taxes in Indiana.

There Is No Clear Tax Pattern Among The Top 20 NIL Tax Earners

Unlike college football, which has many of its top NIL-earners coming from low or no-tax-rate jurisdictions, college basketball has a wider range of where these players are playing their college ball. Only three of the top 20 NIL earners in college basketball chose to play in a state with no state income tax. Furthermore, three of the players play for a team in a state that is often considered a high-income tax rate state – California and New York.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathangoldman/2025/11/03/breaking-down-the-top-20-college-basketball-stars-2025-nil-tax-bills/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Trump's allegation against Noem would constitute a federal crime: analyst

Trump's allegation against Noem would constitute a federal crime: analyst

President Donald Trump caught everyone off guard by suddenly firing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem — but being out of a job could just be the start of
Share
Rawstory2026/03/06 04:49
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28