PANews reported on November 3rd that, according to official sources, Strategy purchased 397 Bitcoins between October 27th and November 2nd at a price of approximately $114,771 per Bitcoin, for a total value of approximately $45.6 million. As of the beginning of 2025, this represents a 26.1% return on Bitcoin. As of November 2nd, 2025, Strategy will hold 641,205 Bitcoins, purchased at approximately $74,057 per Bitcoin, for a total value of approximately $47.49 billion.PANews reported on November 3rd that, according to official sources, Strategy purchased 397 Bitcoins between October 27th and November 2nd at a price of approximately $114,771 per Bitcoin, for a total value of approximately $45.6 million. As of the beginning of 2025, this represents a 26.1% return on Bitcoin. As of November 2nd, 2025, Strategy will hold 641,205 Bitcoins, purchased at approximately $74,057 per Bitcoin, for a total value of approximately $47.49 billion.
Strategy spent $45.6 million last week to acquire 397 bitcoins.
PANews reported on November 3rd that, according to official sources, Strategy purchased 397 Bitcoins between October 27th and November 2nd at a price of approximately $114,771 per Bitcoin, for a total value of approximately $45.6 million. As of the beginning of 2025, this represents a 26.1% return on Bitcoin. As of November 2nd, 2025, Strategy will hold 641,205 Bitcoins, purchased at approximately $74,057 per Bitcoin, for a total value of approximately $47.49 billion.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be
The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias
Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies
This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30