Analyses how Fed stealth QE via the Standing Repo Facility could rekindle a bitcoin bull run, balancing liquidity signals with risk.Analyses how Fed stealth QE via the Standing Repo Facility could rekindle a bitcoin bull run, balancing liquidity signals with risk.

Bitcoin bull run signals as Fed stealth QE expands: 4 things to watch

bitcoin bull run

A Fed-driven liquidity surge could restart a Bitcoin bull run through hidden channels of monetary support. Changes in the Fed balance sheet would amplify that effect.

For the full original essay, see Arthur Hayes essay on CCN, where he calls the SRF “stealth quantitative easing.”

Could the Bitcoin bull run be rekindled by Fed stealth quantitative easing via the standing repo facility?

SRF as stealth QE for the Bitcoin bull run 13

Arthur Hayes frames the Standing Repo Facility (SRF) as a vector for “stealth quantitative easing” that could expand liquidity without overt balance-sheet announcements.

He links large fiscal deficits to rising Treasury supply and argues the SRF lets the Federal Reserve absorb excess cash implicitly. In this context, market participants may reprice risk assets if liquidity expectations change.

Fiscal pressure drivers for the Bitcoin bull run 13

Hayes cites U.S. deficits of roughly $2 trillion annually and corresponding Treasury borrowing as the pressure forcing the Fed toward balance-sheet expansion.

He argues persistent deficits and heavy issuance make repo outlets relevant to macro liquidity conditions. It should be noted that the scale of issuance drives the sensitivity of short-term funding markets.

Arthur Hayes essay published Nov. 3, 2025; claims Fed stealth QE via Standing Repo Facility (SRF) will inject liquidity and reignite Bitcoin bull run.

– Hayes: U.S. deficits ~ $2 trillion annually; Treasury borrowing will force Fed to expand balance sheet.

– Hayes: foreign central banks wary of political risk; prefer gold; RV funds are marginal buyers, using repo to finance carry trades.

– Hayes: SRF balances above zero indicate Fed cashing politicians’ checks; SRF acts as hidden QE conduit.

– Bitcoin was trading just below $102,000 on Nov. 5, 2025; ~20% below ATH; analysts warn of further declines; CCN analyst Valdrin Tahiri warned support near $106,000 and possible drop to $85,700 694,400 if break below $106,500; total crypto market cap below $3.55 trillion.

What liquidity boost from the standing repo facility could reshape the Fed balance sheet and Bitcoin price outlook?

Repo liquidity scale for the Bitcoin bull run 13

Quantifying SRF flows matters for any discussion of a delayed Fed balance sheet expansion and resulting asset implications.

If primary dealers and reverse-repo counterparties shift funding patterns, the effective supply of cash to markets could rise. As a result, risk assets including Bitcoin might see renewed demand under optimistic liquidity assumptions.

Role of relative value funds 13

Hayes notes that relative value funds use repo to finance carry trades, making them marginal buyers in stressed markets.

If repo becomes cheaper or more predictable, these funds could raise exposures, amplifying price moves in Bitcoin and correlated assets. In this setting, funding cost and predictability are key.

Monitor weekly SRF balances and Treasury bill auction sizes to gauge the scale of any implicit accommodation. The Federal Reserve outlines SRF scope and operational terms on its site; see the Fed’s SRF overview Standing Repo Facility: Federal Reserve.

Are analyst warnings compatible with Hayes’ Bitcoin bull run thesis amid a bitcoin market correction?

Market analysts remain cautious despite Hayes’ liquidity narrative. CCN analyst Valdrin Tahiri warned support near $106,000 and a potential drop to $85,700 694,400 if the market falls below $106,500.

Those technical levels highlight that liquidity alone may not override price mechanics or risk sentiment. Based on trade desk experience, liquidity signals often lag technical selling; a policy-driven liquidity tailwind can be overwhelmed in the near term by stop-loss cascades and margin calls.

Do warnings negate the SRF thesis? Not necessarily. Liquidity narratives and technical corrections operate on different timeframes. Hayes focuses on supply-side balance-sheet pressure, while analysts emphasize immediate price action and support levels.

How should traders balance both perspectives? Traders should weigh policy-driven liquidity upside against short-term technical risk, using stop-losses and size discipline. In this context, a liquidity tailwind does not guarantee an uninterrupted rally; it changes probabilities.

What price levels define risk and potential rebound in the Bitcoin bull run scenario?

Price thresholds cited in market coverage provide objective measures of risk. As recorded, Bitcoin was trading just below $102,000 on Nov. 5, 2025, roughly 20% below its ATH, while the total crypto market cap sat below $3.55 trillion. These figures offer concrete anchors to test Hayes’ liquidity-driven thesis.

Which levels signal a failed rebound? A sustained close below the $106,500 pivot would align with analyst warnings and suggest further downside is likely.

Conversely, reclaiming and holding above that area would be required to validate a broader liquidity-driven recovery.

What market-cap context matters? Total market capitalization below $3.55 trillion shows the size of the backdrop against which any SRF-driven flows would act. Small shifts in demand can have outsized impacts when leverage and carry trades are in play.

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02628
$0.02628$0.02628
-1.79%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Market data: ICP rose 4.54% intraday, while GLM fell 5.44% intraday.

Market data: ICP rose 4.54% intraday, while GLM fell 5.44% intraday.

PANews reported on January 16th that, according to OKX market data, the top gainers of the day are: ICP at $4.494, up 4.54%; CHZ at $0.0579, up 4.19%; CRV at $0
Share
PANews2026/01/16 10:00
Iran Crypto Volume Hits $7.78B as IRGC Controls Half of Market

Iran Crypto Volume Hits $7.78B as IRGC Controls Half of Market

The post Iran Crypto Volume Hits $7.78B as IRGC Controls Half of Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Darius Baruo Jan 15, 2026 15:54 Chainalysis data
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 10:16