The post Cubs And Shota Imanaga Decline Options, Team Makes A Qualifying Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Cubs had a potential three-year option on Shota Imanaga, he had a potential one-year option on the Cubs. The team made him a Qualifying Offer. Everyone rejected everything, and now the pitcher is a free agent. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images) Getty Images Who doesn’t love a creative contract? A player values himself at a certain level, the team feels otherwise. The team wants cost certainty and downside protection; the player wants long-term security. The team tries not to be held hostage by demands down the road; but the player desires flexibility if he outperforms his projections. So, smart people sit in a room and hash out a deal that attempts to check every box. It so rarely happens that we need to acknowledge it when it does. As I have previously written, the Seattle Mariners’ contract with Julio Rodríguez is the gold standard in this regard. But so too was the deal that super-agent Scott Boras hashed out with the Philadelphia Philles for Jake Arrieta in 2016. But a deal that was overlooked at the time, but that has come into focus this week, was the one that the Chicago Cubs signed with pitcher Shota Imanaga before the 2024 season. On its face, the contract was four years, $53 million. Simple enough. Just to make it slightly more complicated, there was a $1 million signing bonus, a $9 million salary for 2024, $13 million salary for 2025, and $15 million for each of 2026 and 2027. After this season, the Cubs had the right to exercise an option for 2028 (yes, three years into the future). To do so, it would become a three-year, $57 million extension (2026 and 2027 go from $15 million to $20 million, and 2028 would be $17 million). Had Imanaga performed as the… The post Cubs And Shota Imanaga Decline Options, Team Makes A Qualifying Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Cubs had a potential three-year option on Shota Imanaga, he had a potential one-year option on the Cubs. The team made him a Qualifying Offer. Everyone rejected everything, and now the pitcher is a free agent. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images) Getty Images Who doesn’t love a creative contract? A player values himself at a certain level, the team feels otherwise. The team wants cost certainty and downside protection; the player wants long-term security. The team tries not to be held hostage by demands down the road; but the player desires flexibility if he outperforms his projections. So, smart people sit in a room and hash out a deal that attempts to check every box. It so rarely happens that we need to acknowledge it when it does. As I have previously written, the Seattle Mariners’ contract with Julio Rodríguez is the gold standard in this regard. But so too was the deal that super-agent Scott Boras hashed out with the Philadelphia Philles for Jake Arrieta in 2016. But a deal that was overlooked at the time, but that has come into focus this week, was the one that the Chicago Cubs signed with pitcher Shota Imanaga before the 2024 season. On its face, the contract was four years, $53 million. Simple enough. Just to make it slightly more complicated, there was a $1 million signing bonus, a $9 million salary for 2024, $13 million salary for 2025, and $15 million for each of 2026 and 2027. After this season, the Cubs had the right to exercise an option for 2028 (yes, three years into the future). To do so, it would become a three-year, $57 million extension (2026 and 2027 go from $15 million to $20 million, and 2028 would be $17 million). Had Imanaga performed as the…

Cubs And Shota Imanaga Decline Options, Team Makes A Qualifying Offer

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The Cubs had a potential three-year option on Shota Imanaga, he had a potential one-year option on the Cubs. The team made him a Qualifying Offer. Everyone rejected everything, and now the pitcher is a free agent. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Who doesn’t love a creative contract? A player values himself at a certain level, the team feels otherwise. The team wants cost certainty and downside protection; the player wants long-term security. The team tries not to be held hostage by demands down the road; but the player desires flexibility if he outperforms his projections. So, smart people sit in a room and hash out a deal that attempts to check every box. It so rarely happens that we need to acknowledge it when it does. As I have previously written, the Seattle Mariners’ contract with Julio Rodríguez is the gold standard in this regard. But so too was the deal that super-agent Scott Boras hashed out with the Philadelphia Philles for Jake Arrieta in 2016.

But a deal that was overlooked at the time, but that has come into focus this week, was the one that the Chicago Cubs signed with pitcher Shota Imanaga before the 2024 season. On its face, the contract was four years, $53 million. Simple enough. Just to make it slightly more complicated, there was a $1 million signing bonus, a $9 million salary for 2024, $13 million salary for 2025, and $15 million for each of 2026 and 2027.

After this season, the Cubs had the right to exercise an option for 2028 (yes, three years into the future). To do so, it would become a three-year, $57 million extension (2026 and 2027 go from $15 million to $20 million, and 2028 would be $17 million). Had Imanaga performed as the Cubs had hoped, $19 million per season for a middle-of-the-rotation starter would be a good value.

But wait, there is more. The deal had incentives built in, and because Imanaga finished fifth in Cy Young voting in 2024, all future salaries went up by $250,000. As such, this became a potential $57.75 million extension.

If the Cubs elected not to exercise their three-year option, the pitcher could remain in Chicago by exercising his own option for 2026 at $15 million (actually $15.25 million because of the Cy Young kicker).

If Imanaga exercised that option to stay with the club for 2026, then the Cubs would then have yet another option at the end of the season: two years, $42 million ($24 million in 2027 and $18 million in 2028). If the team decided to cut bait after 2026, the pitcher could still remain with the club by exercising an option for 2027 at $15 million. Got it?

Well, Shota Imanaga had a pretty mediocre season on the North Side. He went 9-8 with a 3.73 ERA and a 4.86 FIP. His 103 ERA+ was just about average. In a year when the wind blew in for three-quarters of the Cubs home games, he gave up 17 dingers at Wrigley Field. His 31 home runs were fourth worst in MLB (among 873 eligible pitchers). The team lost such faith in him that they elected to go with a bullpen game in the must-win Game 5 of the National League Division Series against the Brewers rather than throw the fully-rested lefty. The Cubs lost 3-1.

So, the die had been cast; and this week Chicago elected not to exercise their three-year option on the Japanese pitcher. Imanaga, in turn, elected not to exercise his one-year, $15 million option, making him a free agent…almost. The Cubs still had the ability to make a “Qualifying Offer” to the pitcher, which (a) if he accepted, would pay him $22.025 million for 2026 or (b) if he declined, would entitle the team to draft pick compensation if/when he signs with another team.

Immediately prior to the 4pm deadline earlier today, the Cubs did, in fact, extend a Qualifying Offer to the left-hander. Imanaga now has until Tuesday, November 18th to either accept the QO and be paid more than $22 million next season to pitch for Chicago or reject the offer and finally become an unrestricted free agent. Of course, between now and two Tuesdays from now, the player and the team could negotiate something else entirely. With a deal like this, anything is possible!

Chicago Cubs president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer understands player value and knows how to negotiate. (Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danfreedman/2025/11/06/the-cubs-decline-shota-imanagas-option-and-he-decline-qualifying-offer/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Trump rages at 'independent' Supreme Court judges: 'I just want smart decisions'

Trump rages at 'independent' Supreme Court judges: 'I just want smart decisions'

President Donald Trump raged at "independent" Supreme Court judges on Monday during a bill signing ceremony in the Oval Office. Trump and several administration
Share
Rawstory2026/03/17 05:07
Vitalik Buterin Pushes Simpler Ethereum Node Setup

Vitalik Buterin Pushes Simpler Ethereum Node Setup

TLDR Vitalik Buterin supported a Nimbus proposal to merge Ethereum’s two clients into a single program. He said running two daemons makes node operation harder
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/17 04:46