The post Why Is The Air Traffic Control System Still Part Of The Government? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Federal Aviation Administration ordered a 4% reduction in operations at 40 major U.S. airports, including Orlando International, which will increase to 10% by November 14 due to a shortage of air traffic controllers who are working without pay as the shutdown continues. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images The government shutdown created a mess for air travel, which raises the fundamental question: Why is the Air Traffic Control (ATC) system still part of the government? Thousands of flights were cancelled, and millions of travelers had their plans upended because the government shutdown meant air traffic controllers didn’t get paid. A number of controllers decided that no pay meant no work and stayed off the job. These no-shows hit a system that was already in serious crisis. Even before the shutdown, nearly 90% of control towers across the country were understaffed. The deadly air collision at Reagan National Airport in January and numerous near misses testify to a troubled system. Much of the equipment is obsolete and the technology, woefully outdated. Last May, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy proposed an ambitious $31.5 billion modernization program to overhaul our shockingly decrepit system over the next three to four years. He requested that the money be provided upfront so that long-term contracting commitments could be made. Congress approved $12.5 billion and was very specific on how the funds were to be spent. The rest of the money would be appropriated, sometime in the future. Here’s the fundamental problem: Sensible, long-term management and planning are impossible as long as the government runs ATC. Micromanagement by parochial politicians and the uncertainty of year-to-year funding guarantee failure, just as they have in the past. There have been glittering promises of modernization before, but they all flopped with unpredictable, inadequate funding and… The post Why Is The Air Traffic Control System Still Part Of The Government? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Federal Aviation Administration ordered a 4% reduction in operations at 40 major U.S. airports, including Orlando International, which will increase to 10% by November 14 due to a shortage of air traffic controllers who are working without pay as the shutdown continues. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/Anadolu via Getty Images) Anadolu via Getty Images The government shutdown created a mess for air travel, which raises the fundamental question: Why is the Air Traffic Control (ATC) system still part of the government? Thousands of flights were cancelled, and millions of travelers had their plans upended because the government shutdown meant air traffic controllers didn’t get paid. A number of controllers decided that no pay meant no work and stayed off the job. These no-shows hit a system that was already in serious crisis. Even before the shutdown, nearly 90% of control towers across the country were understaffed. The deadly air collision at Reagan National Airport in January and numerous near misses testify to a troubled system. Much of the equipment is obsolete and the technology, woefully outdated. Last May, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy proposed an ambitious $31.5 billion modernization program to overhaul our shockingly decrepit system over the next three to four years. He requested that the money be provided upfront so that long-term contracting commitments could be made. Congress approved $12.5 billion and was very specific on how the funds were to be spent. The rest of the money would be appropriated, sometime in the future. Here’s the fundamental problem: Sensible, long-term management and planning are impossible as long as the government runs ATC. Micromanagement by parochial politicians and the uncertainty of year-to-year funding guarantee failure, just as they have in the past. There have been glittering promises of modernization before, but they all flopped with unpredictable, inadequate funding and…

Why Is The Air Traffic Control System Still Part Of The Government?

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The Federal Aviation Administration ordered a 4% reduction in operations at 40 major U.S. airports, including Orlando International, which will increase to 10% by November 14 due to a shortage of air traffic controllers who are working without pay as the shutdown continues. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Anadolu via Getty Images

The government shutdown created a mess for air travel, which raises the fundamental question: Why is the Air Traffic Control (ATC) system still part of the government?

Thousands of flights were cancelled, and millions of travelers had their plans upended because the government shutdown meant air traffic controllers didn’t get paid. A number of controllers decided that no pay meant no work and stayed off the job. These no-shows hit a system that was already in serious crisis. Even before the shutdown, nearly 90% of control towers across the country were understaffed. The deadly air collision at Reagan National Airport in January and numerous near misses testify to a troubled system. Much of the equipment is obsolete and the technology, woefully outdated.

Last May, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy proposed an ambitious $31.5 billion modernization program to overhaul our shockingly decrepit system over the next three to four years. He requested that the money be provided upfront so that long-term contracting commitments could be made. Congress approved $12.5 billion and was very specific on how the funds were to be spent. The rest of the money would be appropriated, sometime in the future.

Here’s the fundamental problem: Sensible, long-term management and planning are impossible as long as the government runs ATC. Micromanagement by parochial politicians and the uncertainty of year-to-year funding guarantee failure, just as they have in the past. There have been glittering promises of modernization before, but they all flopped with unpredictable, inadequate funding and routinely-missed deadlines.

That the mightiest country in the world and the pioneer in aviation should be hobbled with a system fit for the Smithsonian Museum is a shameful disgrace. The ATC increasingly endangers passenger safety. Because of obsolete routing, the outdated way it spaces distances between aircraft and its stunning lack of modern technology to deal with adverse weather conditions, the ATC system chronically causes longer than necessary flights.

The solution to all this is to do what scores of other countries have done for years: Remove the ATC system from politics, transforming it into an independent, nonprofit organization. Safety regulations would remain with the Federal Aviation Administration. The new entity would be financed by user fees. It could float bonds for large-scale, long-term projects. All this would free it from the destructive, short-sighted vagaries of the Washington politicians.

This is not theory. Many other countries, such as Germany, Canada and Japan, have gone in this direction since New Zealand successfully adopted such an approach back in 1987. The U.S. is truly the outlier here. President Trump proposed this kind of necessary reform during his first term, but it was grounded by Congress. He should relaunch it now. The U.S. should be the cutting-edge innovator in ATC, instead of an embarrassing and increasingly high-risk laggard.

By the way, the president is right to recommend a $10,000 bonus for controllers who remained on the job during the shutdown.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2025/11/11/why-is-the-air-traffic-control-system-still-part-of-the-government/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Top Bitcoin Gambling Sites for Secure Play

Top Bitcoin Gambling Sites for Secure Play

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos Did you know that top-rated
Share
Cryptsy2026/03/18 07:34
Saylor Says Bitcoin Could Win Big If AI Destroys Traditional Moats

Saylor Says Bitcoin Could Win Big If AI Destroys Traditional Moats

Michael Saylor says Bitcoin could emerge as one of the biggest winners if artificial intelligence compresses corporate “terminal value” and forces markets to stop
Share
Bitcoinist2026/03/18 07:00