The post Aave founder warns U.K. rules could make GBP stablecoins ‘unattractive’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is the U.K.’s new proposal bad for stablecoins?  Per Kulechov, the reserve model and holding restriction would repel issuers  What’s the status of pound-backed stablecoins? They rank 10th on the stablecoin market, and the proposal would do less to improve their standings.  The Founder of DeFi lending protocol Aave [AAVE], Stani Kulechov, has slammed the recent U.K. proposal to cap stablecoins at £20k and limit yield-bearing reserves to only 60%.  In an X post, Kulechov warned that if the country proceeds with the “misguided” plan, stablecoin issuers would likely give it a pass. He quipped,  “That (60% yielding assets) makes pound-backed stablecoins inefficient, uncompetitive, and unattractive compared with global alternatives.” For Kulechov, however, the plans could dent the pound-based stablecoin growth potential. He added,  “HM Treasury is likely to copy this approach, turning the UK into one of the least appealing places to issue a stablecoin. This is another misguided move by the Bank of England.”  Source: X GBP vs U.S dollar-backed stablecoins For comparison, the U.S. doesn’t limit the amount of reserve assets that are investable in yield-bearing products, such as T-bills. The only key prerequisite is a 1:1 backing for the issued stablecoin.  The business model is lucrative due to the yield. Tether, the USDT issuer, for example, has made $10B in YTD profits because of this viable model. About 77% of USDT reserves are parked in T-bills and cash equivalents.  Now, some players plan to lobby the U.K. government to relax the restrictions, perhaps to mirror the U.S. stance and remain attractive.  That said, the US dollar enjoys a massive moat due to its global reserve standing, as evidenced by its substantial foreign reserves.  The macro moat behind USD dominance According to the IMF, as of 2025, the USD controlled 58% of global foreign… The post Aave founder warns U.K. rules could make GBP stablecoins ‘unattractive’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is the U.K.’s new proposal bad for stablecoins?  Per Kulechov, the reserve model and holding restriction would repel issuers  What’s the status of pound-backed stablecoins? They rank 10th on the stablecoin market, and the proposal would do less to improve their standings.  The Founder of DeFi lending protocol Aave [AAVE], Stani Kulechov, has slammed the recent U.K. proposal to cap stablecoins at £20k and limit yield-bearing reserves to only 60%.  In an X post, Kulechov warned that if the country proceeds with the “misguided” plan, stablecoin issuers would likely give it a pass. He quipped,  “That (60% yielding assets) makes pound-backed stablecoins inefficient, uncompetitive, and unattractive compared with global alternatives.” For Kulechov, however, the plans could dent the pound-based stablecoin growth potential. He added,  “HM Treasury is likely to copy this approach, turning the UK into one of the least appealing places to issue a stablecoin. This is another misguided move by the Bank of England.”  Source: X GBP vs U.S dollar-backed stablecoins For comparison, the U.S. doesn’t limit the amount of reserve assets that are investable in yield-bearing products, such as T-bills. The only key prerequisite is a 1:1 backing for the issued stablecoin.  The business model is lucrative due to the yield. Tether, the USDT issuer, for example, has made $10B in YTD profits because of this viable model. About 77% of USDT reserves are parked in T-bills and cash equivalents.  Now, some players plan to lobby the U.K. government to relax the restrictions, perhaps to mirror the U.S. stance and remain attractive.  That said, the US dollar enjoys a massive moat due to its global reserve standing, as evidenced by its substantial foreign reserves.  The macro moat behind USD dominance According to the IMF, as of 2025, the USD controlled 58% of global foreign…

Aave founder warns U.K. rules could make GBP stablecoins ‘unattractive’

Key Takeaways

Why is the U.K.’s new proposal bad for stablecoins? 

Per Kulechov, the reserve model and holding restriction would repel issuers 

What’s the status of pound-backed stablecoins?

They rank 10th on the stablecoin market, and the proposal would do less to improve their standings. 


The Founder of DeFi lending protocol Aave [AAVE], Stani Kulechov, has slammed the recent U.K. proposal to cap stablecoins at £20k and limit yield-bearing reserves to only 60%. 

In an X post, Kulechov warned that if the country proceeds with the “misguided” plan, stablecoin issuers would likely give it a pass. He quipped, 

For Kulechov, however, the plans could dent the pound-based stablecoin growth potential. He added, 

Source: X

GBP vs U.S dollar-backed stablecoins

For comparison, the U.S. doesn’t limit the amount of reserve assets that are investable in yield-bearing products, such as T-bills. The only key prerequisite is a 1:1 backing for the issued stablecoin. 

The business model is lucrative due to the yield. Tether, the USDT issuer, for example, has made $10B in YTD profits because of this viable model. About 77% of USDT reserves are parked in T-bills and cash equivalents. 

Now, some players plan to lobby the U.K. government to relax the restrictions, perhaps to mirror the U.S. stance and remain attractive. 

That said, the US dollar enjoys a massive moat due to its global reserve standing, as evidenced by its substantial foreign reserves. 

The macro moat behind USD dominance

According to the IMF, as of 2025, the USD controlled 58% of global foreign reserves, followed by the Euro (6%) and the Great British pound, GBP (5%). The Chinese Renminbi came in fourth at 2%, but has been growing steadily. 

Source: IMF

Put differently, offshore demand for USD is huge compared to GBP and would cap the growth of pound-backed stablecoins. 

A similar stance was recently shared by Chuk Okpalugo, former Product Lead at stablecoin issuer Paxos. In fact, he said that “people don’t want stablecoins, they want U.S. dollars,” especially in the emerging markets.

As of writing, the USD-backed stablecoin commanded 99.8% ($303.7 billion) of the stablecoin market share. Euro-backed products came in second, while the pound-backed segment ranks 10th with only $341k worth of assets.  

Source: Artemis

Previous: Dogecoin: Can DOGE breakout despite $700M whale sell-off?
Next: Uniswap: Why UNI traders should watch THIS price level to buy

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/aave-founder-warns-u-k-rules-could-make-gbp-stablecoins-unattractive/

Market Opportunity
AaveToken Logo
AaveToken Price(AAVE)
$154.95
$154.95$154.95
+0.84%
USD
AaveToken (AAVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00