Author: 0xhhh I. Introduction: Blind Spots of Trust Blockchain is a revolution in trust, but its trust is closed. It believes in mathematics, but not in the world. Early blockchains resembled a logician: they firmly believed in reasoning but rejected perception. Bitcoin trusts hashes, not people; Ethereum trusts code, not input. So when a contract tries to ask "What is the price of ETH?", it falls silent. This is not a technological flaw, but rather a boundary of philosophy. The certainty of blockchain comes from its separation from the external world. The source of trust is isolation. But without a connection, there is no meaning. The history of humankind building trust systems is a process of constantly allowing the "system" to see "reality" again. The oracle is the first hand reaching out from this crack. It is both a connection and a source of pollution; It was both a breakthrough and the beginning of a crisis. II. First Phase: Cracks in the Cave (2015–2018) Background: Isolated islands of closed intelligence In 2015, Ethereum brought the concept of "code is law" to the world. But the law requires evidence, and there are no "external facts" on the blockchain. A "weather-based compensation" contract cannot know whether it will rain today; A synthetic asset that "tracks stock prices" cannot see Nasdaq. Smart contracts have become prisoners in Plato's Cave, only able to gaze at the shadows on the chain. The very purity of blockchain technology has become its constraint. Question: How to "see" without being contaminated? How can we enable blockchain to see the outside world without being contaminated by it? Trusting external data implies the introduction of subjectivity and centralization, and the purpose of blockchain is precisely to eliminate both. Thus, "trusted input" becomes the first paradox of decentralized trust systems. Technological Evolution Oraclize (Provable): Proves that the data indeed comes from a specific source using TLSNotary. Town Crier (Cornell): Secure data reading using the Intel SGX Trusted Execution Environment. Chainlink (2017): Proposed a decentralized oracle network where nodes stake LINK, aggregate data, and form a weighted consensus. The first breath of trust Blockchain makes trust logical; oracles make trust concrete. Machines learned to "believe" for the first time, while humans began to define truth using algorithms. III. Phase Two: The Market for Truth (2019–2021) Background: Trust Famine in DeFi The DeFi boom has made price feeds the lifeline of the system. Liquidation, derivatives, stablecoins, and synthetic assets all rely on external prices. However, price manipulation once could trigger a chain reaction. The truth has become a resource that can be arbitrageurized. Technological Evolution Tellor (TRB): The truth emerges through a game of negotiation using a collateral and challenge mechanism. UMA (Optimistic Oracle): Trusted by default until challenged. Kleros (PNK): Decentralized jury verdicts on factual disputes. Band Protocol / DIA: Introduces a compromise solution at the API layer, balancing speed and reliability. The era of trust games Tellor makes the truth the equilibrium in the game. UMA makes the truth the default state. Kleros makes truth a social contract. Trust is no longer a list, but the result of a game. The truth was "marketized" for the first time. IV. The Third Phase: The War of Time (2021–2023) Background: The Crisis of Delayed Truth In the era of high-frequency trading and clearing, latency is a risk. When the truth is slower than a lie, the system will punish the truth. Technological Evolution Pyth Network (PYTH): Quotes are directly signed by exchanges, with the source being the nodes. RedStone (RED): Pull price feeds on demand, and verify immediately upon execution. API3: First-party oracle, data sources sign and publish themselves. Band Protocol: Implementing a cross-chain data layer on Cosmos. When time becomes the shape of truth Trust has shifted from "correct" to "timely". Oracles have become "arbiters of time". Delay becomes a new dimension of trust. ???? Trust Begins to Have a Price: The Awakening of OEV (2023–2024) OEV (Oracle Extractable Value) — The arbitrage difference between truth and time. The moment a price is updated is not only an informational event, but also a value-driven event. The order in which the truth is disseminated begins to determine the distribution of wealth. The question is no longer "whether it is true or not", but "who benefits from the truth". Technological and Mechanism Evolution Chainlink OEV Network (2024): Creates an OEV auction marketplace that allows priority update rights to be bid on. Pyth / SEDA: Suppressing internal arbitrage through timestamp signatures and random committees. RedStone Pull Mode: Naturally eliminates time lag and leaves no arbitrage window. The truth begins to be priced. OEV gives trust economic weight. In the past, we discussed "who is telling the truth," Now we need to discuss "who benefits from telling the truth". Trust extends from fact verification to value governance. V. Phase Four: The Collision Between Intelligence and Privacy (2023–2025) Background: AI Entering the Trust System AI models can judge the market and analyze news, but their "truthfulness" cannot be verified. When machines begin to determine the truth, how do we judge the machines? Technological Evolution Oraichain (ORAI): Proof of Execution (AI Inference). Phala / iExec: Generate remote proofs using TEE trusted hardware. SEDA / Supra / Entangle: Integrating AI verification with cross-chain synchronization. Verification of reason When we ask machines to prove their rationality, Oracle has transformed from "verifying the world" to "verifying intelligence". Trust extends to the judgment layer. VI. Fifth Stage: Trust Rebuilding in the Agent Era (2025 →) Background: The Rise of AI Agents AI agents already possess economic behavior capabilities. They sign contracts, negotiate partnerships, and execute transactions. But algorithms have no ethics, only inputs. When intelligent agents trade with each other, who guarantees that they are seeing the same world? Technological Evolution Sora Oracle (SORA): AI Oracle + Payment Protocol + Prediction Market, forming a cognitive self-correction system. Flux / OptionRoom: Embedded prediction markets for fact verification. Orochi Network: Building a machine identity system to make judgments traceable. Rebuilding Trust When intelligent agents become the main body of society, humans transform from "trust bearers" to "trust designers". Trust between machines is not based on emotion, but on protocols. Oracle has transformed from a data interface into a civilization structure. VII. Epilogue: From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer Ten years of evolution, each upgrade of Oracle All of this stemmed from a crisis of trust, and it also opened up new frontiers. Blockchain makes trust computable; Oracle makes reality computable; AI Oracle makes intelligence computable. Oracle is no longer just a bridge, but a trust layer for intelligent civilization. In conclusion If blockchain is the memory layer of civilization, then Oracle is the sensory layer of civilization. We are teaching machines something they've never done before: how to perceive honestly. When the intelligent society truly arrives, Oracle will not only transmit data, but also the form of truth.Author: 0xhhh I. Introduction: Blind Spots of Trust Blockchain is a revolution in trust, but its trust is closed. It believes in mathematics, but not in the world. Early blockchains resembled a logician: they firmly believed in reasoning but rejected perception. Bitcoin trusts hashes, not people; Ethereum trusts code, not input. So when a contract tries to ask "What is the price of ETH?", it falls silent. This is not a technological flaw, but rather a boundary of philosophy. The certainty of blockchain comes from its separation from the external world. The source of trust is isolation. But without a connection, there is no meaning. The history of humankind building trust systems is a process of constantly allowing the "system" to see "reality" again. The oracle is the first hand reaching out from this crack. It is both a connection and a source of pollution; It was both a breakthrough and the beginning of a crisis. II. First Phase: Cracks in the Cave (2015–2018) Background: Isolated islands of closed intelligence In 2015, Ethereum brought the concept of "code is law" to the world. But the law requires evidence, and there are no "external facts" on the blockchain. A "weather-based compensation" contract cannot know whether it will rain today; A synthetic asset that "tracks stock prices" cannot see Nasdaq. Smart contracts have become prisoners in Plato's Cave, only able to gaze at the shadows on the chain. The very purity of blockchain technology has become its constraint. Question: How to "see" without being contaminated? How can we enable blockchain to see the outside world without being contaminated by it? Trusting external data implies the introduction of subjectivity and centralization, and the purpose of blockchain is precisely to eliminate both. Thus, "trusted input" becomes the first paradox of decentralized trust systems. Technological Evolution Oraclize (Provable): Proves that the data indeed comes from a specific source using TLSNotary. Town Crier (Cornell): Secure data reading using the Intel SGX Trusted Execution Environment. Chainlink (2017): Proposed a decentralized oracle network where nodes stake LINK, aggregate data, and form a weighted consensus. The first breath of trust Blockchain makes trust logical; oracles make trust concrete. Machines learned to "believe" for the first time, while humans began to define truth using algorithms. III. Phase Two: The Market for Truth (2019–2021) Background: Trust Famine in DeFi The DeFi boom has made price feeds the lifeline of the system. Liquidation, derivatives, stablecoins, and synthetic assets all rely on external prices. However, price manipulation once could trigger a chain reaction. The truth has become a resource that can be arbitrageurized. Technological Evolution Tellor (TRB): The truth emerges through a game of negotiation using a collateral and challenge mechanism. UMA (Optimistic Oracle): Trusted by default until challenged. Kleros (PNK): Decentralized jury verdicts on factual disputes. Band Protocol / DIA: Introduces a compromise solution at the API layer, balancing speed and reliability. The era of trust games Tellor makes the truth the equilibrium in the game. UMA makes the truth the default state. Kleros makes truth a social contract. Trust is no longer a list, but the result of a game. The truth was "marketized" for the first time. IV. The Third Phase: The War of Time (2021–2023) Background: The Crisis of Delayed Truth In the era of high-frequency trading and clearing, latency is a risk. When the truth is slower than a lie, the system will punish the truth. Technological Evolution Pyth Network (PYTH): Quotes are directly signed by exchanges, with the source being the nodes. RedStone (RED): Pull price feeds on demand, and verify immediately upon execution. API3: First-party oracle, data sources sign and publish themselves. Band Protocol: Implementing a cross-chain data layer on Cosmos. When time becomes the shape of truth Trust has shifted from "correct" to "timely". Oracles have become "arbiters of time". Delay becomes a new dimension of trust. ???? Trust Begins to Have a Price: The Awakening of OEV (2023–2024) OEV (Oracle Extractable Value) — The arbitrage difference between truth and time. The moment a price is updated is not only an informational event, but also a value-driven event. The order in which the truth is disseminated begins to determine the distribution of wealth. The question is no longer "whether it is true or not", but "who benefits from the truth". Technological and Mechanism Evolution Chainlink OEV Network (2024): Creates an OEV auction marketplace that allows priority update rights to be bid on. Pyth / SEDA: Suppressing internal arbitrage through timestamp signatures and random committees. RedStone Pull Mode: Naturally eliminates time lag and leaves no arbitrage window. The truth begins to be priced. OEV gives trust economic weight. In the past, we discussed "who is telling the truth," Now we need to discuss "who benefits from telling the truth". Trust extends from fact verification to value governance. V. Phase Four: The Collision Between Intelligence and Privacy (2023–2025) Background: AI Entering the Trust System AI models can judge the market and analyze news, but their "truthfulness" cannot be verified. When machines begin to determine the truth, how do we judge the machines? Technological Evolution Oraichain (ORAI): Proof of Execution (AI Inference). Phala / iExec: Generate remote proofs using TEE trusted hardware. SEDA / Supra / Entangle: Integrating AI verification with cross-chain synchronization. Verification of reason When we ask machines to prove their rationality, Oracle has transformed from "verifying the world" to "verifying intelligence". Trust extends to the judgment layer. VI. Fifth Stage: Trust Rebuilding in the Agent Era (2025 →) Background: The Rise of AI Agents AI agents already possess economic behavior capabilities. They sign contracts, negotiate partnerships, and execute transactions. But algorithms have no ethics, only inputs. When intelligent agents trade with each other, who guarantees that they are seeing the same world? Technological Evolution Sora Oracle (SORA): AI Oracle + Payment Protocol + Prediction Market, forming a cognitive self-correction system. Flux / OptionRoom: Embedded prediction markets for fact verification. Orochi Network: Building a machine identity system to make judgments traceable. Rebuilding Trust When intelligent agents become the main body of society, humans transform from "trust bearers" to "trust designers". Trust between machines is not based on emotion, but on protocols. Oracle has transformed from a data interface into a civilization structure. VII. Epilogue: From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer Ten years of evolution, each upgrade of Oracle All of this stemmed from a crisis of trust, and it also opened up new frontiers. Blockchain makes trust computable; Oracle makes reality computable; AI Oracle makes intelligence computable. Oracle is no longer just a bridge, but a trust layer for intelligent civilization. In conclusion If blockchain is the memory layer of civilization, then Oracle is the sensory layer of civilization. We are teaching machines something they've never done before: how to perceive honestly. When the intelligent society truly arrives, Oracle will not only transmit data, but also the form of truth.

The Evolution of Oracles (Part 1): From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer

2025/11/14 15:00
6 min read

Author: 0xhhh

I. Introduction: Blind Spots of Trust

Blockchain is a revolution in trust, but its trust is closed.

It believes in mathematics, but not in the world.

Early blockchains resembled a logician: they firmly believed in reasoning but rejected perception.

Bitcoin trusts hashes, not people; Ethereum trusts code, not input.

So when a contract tries to ask "What is the price of ETH?", it falls silent.

This is not a technological flaw, but rather a boundary of philosophy.

The certainty of blockchain comes from its separation from the external world.

The source of trust is isolation.

But without a connection, there is no meaning.

The history of humankind building trust systems is a process of constantly allowing the "system" to see "reality" again.

The oracle is the first hand reaching out from this crack.

It is both a connection and a source of pollution;

It was both a breakthrough and the beginning of a crisis.

II. First Phase: Cracks in the Cave (2015–2018)

Background: Isolated islands of closed intelligence

In 2015, Ethereum brought the concept of "code is law" to the world.

But the law requires evidence, and there are no "external facts" on the blockchain.

A "weather-based compensation" contract cannot know whether it will rain today;

A synthetic asset that "tracks stock prices" cannot see Nasdaq.

Smart contracts have become prisoners in Plato's Cave, only able to gaze at the shadows on the chain.

The very purity of blockchain technology has become its constraint.

Question: How to "see" without being contaminated?

How can we enable blockchain to see the outside world without being contaminated by it?

Trusting external data implies the introduction of subjectivity and centralization, and the purpose of blockchain is precisely to eliminate both.

Thus, "trusted input" becomes the first paradox of decentralized trust systems.

Technological Evolution

  • Oraclize (Provable): Proves that the data indeed comes from a specific source using TLSNotary.
  • Town Crier (Cornell): Secure data reading using the Intel SGX Trusted Execution Environment.
  • Chainlink (2017): Proposed a decentralized oracle network where nodes stake LINK, aggregate data, and form a weighted consensus.

The first breath of trust

Blockchain makes trust logical; oracles make trust concrete.

Machines learned to "believe" for the first time, while humans began to define truth using algorithms.

III. Phase Two: The Market for Truth (2019–2021)

Background: Trust Famine in DeFi

The DeFi boom has made price feeds the lifeline of the system.

Liquidation, derivatives, stablecoins, and synthetic assets all rely on external prices.

However, price manipulation once could trigger a chain reaction.

The truth has become a resource that can be arbitrageurized.

Technological Evolution

  • Tellor (TRB): The truth emerges through a game of negotiation using a collateral and challenge mechanism.
  • UMA (Optimistic Oracle): Trusted by default until challenged.
  • Kleros (PNK): Decentralized jury verdicts on factual disputes.
  • Band Protocol / DIA: Introduces a compromise solution at the API layer, balancing speed and reliability.

The era of trust games

Tellor makes the truth the equilibrium in the game.

UMA makes the truth the default state.

Kleros makes truth a social contract.

Trust is no longer a list, but the result of a game.

The truth was "marketized" for the first time.

IV. The Third Phase: The War of Time (2021–2023)

Background: The Crisis of Delayed Truth

In the era of high-frequency trading and clearing, latency is a risk.

When the truth is slower than a lie, the system will punish the truth.

Technological Evolution

  • Pyth Network (PYTH): Quotes are directly signed by exchanges, with the source being the nodes.
  • RedStone (RED): Pull price feeds on demand, and verify immediately upon execution.
  • API3: First-party oracle, data sources sign and publish themselves.
  • Band Protocol: Implementing a cross-chain data layer on Cosmos.

When time becomes the shape of truth

Trust has shifted from "correct" to "timely".

Oracles have become "arbiters of time".

Delay becomes a new dimension of trust.

???? Trust Begins to Have a Price: The Awakening of OEV (2023–2024)

OEV (Oracle Extractable Value)

— The arbitrage difference between truth and time.

The moment a price is updated is not only an informational event, but also a value-driven event.

The order in which the truth is disseminated begins to determine the distribution of wealth.

The question is no longer "whether it is true or not", but "who benefits from the truth".

Technological and Mechanism Evolution

Chainlink OEV Network (2024): Creates an OEV auction marketplace that allows priority update rights to be bid on.

Pyth / SEDA: Suppressing internal arbitrage through timestamp signatures and random committees.

RedStone Pull Mode: Naturally eliminates time lag and leaves no arbitrage window.

The truth begins to be priced.

OEV gives trust economic weight.

In the past, we discussed "who is telling the truth,"

Now we need to discuss "who benefits from telling the truth".

Trust extends from fact verification to value governance.

V. Phase Four: The Collision Between Intelligence and Privacy (2023–2025)

Background: AI Entering the Trust System

AI models can judge the market and analyze news, but their "truthfulness" cannot be verified.

When machines begin to determine the truth, how do we judge the machines?

Technological Evolution

  • Oraichain (ORAI): Proof of Execution (AI Inference).
  • Phala / iExec: Generate remote proofs using TEE trusted hardware.
  • SEDA / Supra / Entangle: Integrating AI verification with cross-chain synchronization.

Verification of reason

When we ask machines to prove their rationality,

Oracle has transformed from "verifying the world" to "verifying intelligence".

Trust extends to the judgment layer.

VI. Fifth Stage: Trust Rebuilding in the Agent Era (2025 →)

Background: The Rise of AI Agents

AI agents already possess economic behavior capabilities.

They sign contracts, negotiate partnerships, and execute transactions.

But algorithms have no ethics, only inputs.

Technological Evolution

  • Sora Oracle (SORA): AI Oracle + Payment Protocol + Prediction Market, forming a cognitive self-correction system.
  • Flux / OptionRoom: Embedded prediction markets for fact verification.
  • Orochi Network: Building a machine identity system to make judgments traceable.

Rebuilding Trust

When intelligent agents become the main body of society, humans transform from "trust bearers" to "trust designers".

Trust between machines is not based on emotion, but on protocols.

Oracle has transformed from a data interface into a civilization structure.

VII. Epilogue: From Data Bridge to Intelligent Trust Layer

Ten years of evolution, each upgrade of Oracle

All of this stemmed from a crisis of trust, and it also opened up new frontiers.

Oracle is no longer just a bridge, but a trust layer for intelligent civilization.

In conclusion

If blockchain is the memory layer of civilization, then Oracle is the sensory layer of civilization.

We are teaching machines something they've never done before: how to perceive honestly.

When the intelligent society truly arrives, Oracle will not only transmit data, but also the form of truth.

Market Opportunity
Particl Logo
Particl Price(PART)
$0.2584
$0.2584$0.2584
0.00%
USD
Particl (PART) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Today we compare Pepeto (PEPETO), BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe (and how they stack up today) by the main […] The post Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:39
Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

BitcoinWorld Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal In a dramatic shift for one of cryptocurrency’s leading networks, Solana (
Share
bitcoinworld2026/02/05 06:45