The post Big tech companies set off buying frenzy for carbon credits appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Big tech companies are in a buying frenzy for carbon credits to offset all the pollution their AI operations pump out. The rush has created a shortage, but industry stakeholders say that’s actually what needs to happen to get this market moving. Microsoft and Google have gone on a serious buying spree over the last couple of years. Their purchases pushed prices for the good carbon credits up to almost four times what the cheaper forest protection ones cost. Tech firms have dropped hundreds of millions since 2019 on permanent carbon removal, mostly in recent years. CDR.fyi tracks this data and says total spending between spot market buys and longer-term deals hit $10 billion. Scientists say we need these carbon removal projects to slow down global warming. They balance out emissions from industries that still burn fossil fuels, like power plants. Tech companies keep throwing up more data centers for AI, and a lot of them run on fossil fuels. So profits climb, but emissions do too. That’s what’s really pushing demand. AI boom drives carbon spending Brennan Spellacy runs a climate tech company called Patch. He says lots of businesses are using AI to grow, then taking some of that money to buy credits. “The companies that are performing well are investing heavily, and the reason why these companies are performing well is AI. So AI’s driving profit and profit’s driving investment”, Spellacy said at the COP30 climate conference in Brazil, as mentioned in a Reuters report. The big tech names all claim they’re shooting for net-zero emissions down the road. Meanwhile, the US bailed on the 2015 Paris climate deal under President Donald Trump. A Microsoft spokesperson explained their approach: “We send strong demand signals through long-term offtakes to unlock a virtuous cycle of innovation, financing, and deployment.… The post Big tech companies set off buying frenzy for carbon credits appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Big tech companies are in a buying frenzy for carbon credits to offset all the pollution their AI operations pump out. The rush has created a shortage, but industry stakeholders say that’s actually what needs to happen to get this market moving. Microsoft and Google have gone on a serious buying spree over the last couple of years. Their purchases pushed prices for the good carbon credits up to almost four times what the cheaper forest protection ones cost. Tech firms have dropped hundreds of millions since 2019 on permanent carbon removal, mostly in recent years. CDR.fyi tracks this data and says total spending between spot market buys and longer-term deals hit $10 billion. Scientists say we need these carbon removal projects to slow down global warming. They balance out emissions from industries that still burn fossil fuels, like power plants. Tech companies keep throwing up more data centers for AI, and a lot of them run on fossil fuels. So profits climb, but emissions do too. That’s what’s really pushing demand. AI boom drives carbon spending Brennan Spellacy runs a climate tech company called Patch. He says lots of businesses are using AI to grow, then taking some of that money to buy credits. “The companies that are performing well are investing heavily, and the reason why these companies are performing well is AI. So AI’s driving profit and profit’s driving investment”, Spellacy said at the COP30 climate conference in Brazil, as mentioned in a Reuters report. The big tech names all claim they’re shooting for net-zero emissions down the road. Meanwhile, the US bailed on the 2015 Paris climate deal under President Donald Trump. A Microsoft spokesperson explained their approach: “We send strong demand signals through long-term offtakes to unlock a virtuous cycle of innovation, financing, and deployment.…

Big tech companies set off buying frenzy for carbon credits

Big tech companies are in a buying frenzy for carbon credits to offset all the pollution their AI operations pump out. The rush has created a shortage, but industry stakeholders say that’s actually what needs to happen to get this market moving.

Microsoft and Google have gone on a serious buying spree over the last couple of years. Their purchases pushed prices for the good carbon credits up to almost four times what the cheaper forest protection ones cost.

Tech firms have dropped hundreds of millions since 2019 on permanent carbon removal, mostly in recent years. CDR.fyi tracks this data and says total spending between spot market buys and longer-term deals hit $10 billion.

Scientists say we need these carbon removal projects to slow down global warming. They balance out emissions from industries that still burn fossil fuels, like power plants.

Tech companies keep throwing up more data centers for AI, and a lot of them run on fossil fuels. So profits climb, but emissions do too. That’s what’s really pushing demand.

AI boom drives carbon spending

Brennan Spellacy runs a climate tech company called Patch. He says lots of businesses are using AI to grow, then taking some of that money to buy credits.

“The companies that are performing well are investing heavily, and the reason why these companies are performing well is AI. So AI’s driving profit and profit’s driving investment”, Spellacy said at the COP30 climate conference in Brazil, as mentioned in a Reuters report.

The big tech names all claim they’re shooting for net-zero emissions down the road. Meanwhile, the US bailed on the 2015 Paris climate deal under President Donald Trump.

A Microsoft spokesperson explained their approach: “We send strong demand signals through long-term offtakes to unlock a virtuous cycle of innovation, financing, and deployment. By anchoring large-scale projects, we both drive new supply while leaving headroom for other corporate buyers to enter.”

Buyers are having a rough time getting what they want.

Check out Patch’s numbers. One-third of people wanted biochar credits. But those only made up less than 20% of what actually got sold because there just weren’t enough. Forest restoration credits had the same issue. Requested 25% of the time, sold 12% of the time.

Lukas May handles commercial stuff at Isometric, a carbon registry. His numbers paint a clear picture.

“The desire for high quality is very real, and you can see it in the numbers. In 2024, there were 8 million tons of durable carbon removal purchased, and so far this year, it’s 25 million.”

Big tech’s behind most of that jump, May says.

CDR.fyi’s data shows less than 1 million tons of permanent carbon removal credits have been issued in total. Biochar projects account for most of them.

Supply’s so tight now that more companies are going for offtake agreements. May thinks that’ll help boost supply by giving developers guaranteed buyers.

“At the end of the day, extra demand will drive extra supply,” he said.

Some companies go DIY

Pure Data Centres Group decided they’d just make their own credits. They work with big tech clients and are about to spend 24 million pounds ($31.6 million) building the UK’s biggest biochar facility in Wiltshire.

CEO Dawn Childs said they didn’t have much choice. “When we started to evaluate suppliers, we quickly realised it was very difficult to find a reliable, high-quality product. We decided the best way to guarantee quality was to develop our own expertise and production.”

Alastair Collier runs R&D at A Healthier Earth, the company that’ll operate the new facility. Operations start in December. They’ll scale up over 18 months to pull 9,000 tons of carbon out annually. Three more UK sites are planned.

Collier’s been betting on this for years. “My underlying investment thesis has been for the last three years … that demand will, and already does, significantly outstrip supply.”

This shortage is hitting while concerns about data center emissions keep growing. Some lawmakers want to slap emissions fees on facilities that go over federal limits.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days – normally $100/mo.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/big-tech-carbon-credits-market-squeeze/

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03884
$0.03884$0.03884
+0.20%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage

South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage

The post South Korean Court Sentences Crypto Exchange Employee for Espionage appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Employee sentenced for espionage involving
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/30 04:09