Travis Hill has advanced toward becoming the permanent FDIC chair after a narrow vote by the Senate Banking Committee.Travis Hill has advanced toward becoming the permanent FDIC chair after a narrow vote by the Senate Banking Committee.

Senate Banking Committee approves Travis Hill’s FDIC nomination 13‑11, sending it to the full Senate

2025/11/20 03:30
4 min read

The nomination of Travis Hill to lead the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) moved forward as the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs voted 13-11 along party lines to advance his confirmation to the full Senate.

Hill currently holds the role of acting chairman of the agency, and his elevation comes amid significant policy changes and an internal reassessment at the FDIC. He needs a vote by the full Senate to be confirmed in the position.

To Republicans, he is an advocate for a regulator who will update bank oversight and allow new financial technologies to flourish. For Democrats, he would raise questions about eroding safeguards that protect depositors and financial stability.

Hill is leading the shift in crypto policies

The acting FDIC chair is most widely regarded as one of today’s most pro-crypto financial regulators in the federal government. And he has steered the FDIC over the past year to be more favorable toward digital assets on the basis that U.S. banks should have the opportunity to innovate without too many barriers. 

Under Hill’s leadership, the FDIC has begun rolling back prior guidance that discouraged banks from engaging in crypto-related activities unless they received special approval.

Hill has repeatedly argued that “reputational risk” should not be used as a primary regulatory tool, calling it vague and overly broad. In his view, reputational risk is too subjective to apply fairly across institutions. Instead, he says banks should be evaluated on how they manage actual financial, operational, and compliance risks — not on speculative concerns about public perception.

Some in the digital assets industry have hailed such a shift, arguing that they have been excluded from critical banking services. Hill’s stance indicates a more permissive FDIC, one that’s willing to allow trial and error on blockchain, custody services, and reasonable crypto channeling.

He has also led a transparency push and issued internal supervisory documents that demonstrate how regulators approached banks that worked with crypto firms. In that case, Hill argues, openness improves trust — and provides institutions with clarity in expectation.  

Lawmakers press Hill on oversight and culture

While Hill enjoys strong Republican support, his nomination has been a subject of great controversy. Senators have pointed out unresolved cultural and structural issues within the FDIC that have revealed years of harassment, bullying, and unsafe workplace practices, after an independent investigation reported on the matter. 

At confirmation hearings, Hill faced harsh questions about how he’s solving these problems, what he is doing about them, and what reforms have been implemented since the scandal was brought to light through difficult conversations. There was considerable frustration among several lawmakers who were confused by the delays in receiving updates from Hill and some members of Congress. 

One senator publicly warned Hill that a vote for him was contingent upon full transparency. Hill has maintained that he is committed to repairing the FDIC’s culture, holding the agency accountable, and instilling trust in FDIC staff. More broadly, he has proposed modernizing supervision, simplifying regulatory procedures, and enhancing the FDIC’s capacity to manage troubled banks. 

The same goes for regional bankers who have rallied behind him, saying they feel he can address their needs and that a more balanced regulatory approach, one that does not impose unnecessary burdens, will avoid further problems. 

With committee approval now in place, Hill’s nomination is in the full Senate. If confirmed, he would reshape the FDIC’s approach to innovation and risk-taking, as well as the relationship between banks and the cryptocurrency economy. His reign would likely be one of the sharpest new directions the FDIC has taken in years — one that will expand opportunities for digital-asset companies while also testing how regulators can balance innovation and stability.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz February 21 2026: Today’s Correct Answer and How to Earn Free In-App Tokens The Spur Protocol Daily Quiz for February 21, 2026, is
Share
Hokanews2026/02/21 17:10
Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

The post Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline A central figure in the Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse saga—former prosecutor Alex Acosta, who granted in 2007 the former financier what’s been widely blasted as a “sweetheart deal” for his alleged crimes—has no regrets about the agreement, a Democratic lawmaker told CNN on Friday, as the former Trump official faces questioning from the House Oversight Committee. Alex Acosta, center, arrives for a House Oversight Committee deposition about Jeffrey Epstein on September 19 in Washington D.C. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Key Facts This story is breaking and will be updated. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/19/prosecutor-acosta-who-gave-epstein-sweetheart-deal-testifies-he-no-remorse-lawmaker-says/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 06:37