Michael Saylor’s Strategy Inc. faces potential exclusion from major benchmark indices as the cryptocurrency market declines. Bloomberg, sourced from JPMorgan strategists, reported that MSCI may delist Strategy Inc. from its MSCI USA and Nasdaq 100 indexes. A potential delisting may cause considerable outflows if passive funds tracking these indexes are affected. Wu Blockchain highlighted Bloomberg’s […]Michael Saylor’s Strategy Inc. faces potential exclusion from major benchmark indices as the cryptocurrency market declines. Bloomberg, sourced from JPMorgan strategists, reported that MSCI may delist Strategy Inc. from its MSCI USA and Nasdaq 100 indexes. A potential delisting may cause considerable outflows if passive funds tracking these indexes are affected. Wu Blockchain highlighted Bloomberg’s […]

JPMorgan Signals $2.8 Billion Exodus Risk if Strategy Inc Loses Index Spot

JPMorgan Signals $2.8 Billion Exodus Risk if Strategy Inc Loses Index Spot
  • JPMorgan expects that if Strategy Inc. is excluded from major indices, it is likely to suffer around $2.8 billion in fund outflows.
  • Yields of Strategy’s 10.5% notes increased to 11.5% with Bitcoin’s price decline of around 30%
  • MSCI is assessing firms with over 50% of assets in digital tokens, which may impact around $9 billion of passive investments.

Michael Saylor’s Strategy Inc. faces potential exclusion from major benchmark indices as the cryptocurrency market declines. Bloomberg, sourced from JPMorgan strategists, reported that MSCI may delist Strategy Inc. from its MSCI USA and Nasdaq 100 indexes. A potential delisting may cause considerable outflows if passive funds tracking these indexes are affected.

Wu Blockchain highlighted Bloomberg’s report, noting Strategy Inc.’s possible removal from the MSCI USA and Nasdaq 100. The review focuses on whether digital-asset-heavy firms function more like investment funds, as passive products with around $9 billion, which track a Strategy, and rely heavily on investments in digital assets.

MSCI plans to complete its consultation by January 15th. Market participants argue that those involved in digital assets in treasury functions affect index constituents. But, according to JPMorgan strategists, exclusion might affect market perception. The decline in crypto markets, down by over $1 trillion from October’s market value, is affecting sentiment and fund allocations broadly.

JPMorgan Signals Institutional Interest Could Decline

JPMorgan’s Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou reportedly viewed that Strategy could also lose its index holdings. It is estimated that if MSCI withdraws its index listing, $2.8 billion may instantly leave, and further outflows may occur if other index firms withdraw listing support as well.

MSCI declared last October that cryptocurrency treasury firms are ‘investment funds’ and not qualified to be included in any stock index. The new standard applies to those firms whose cryptocurrency holdings exceed 50% of their overall assets, symbolizing a new era in which firms focusing on cryptocurrencies are defined differently under traditional global equity indexing.

Strategy’s shares have dropped over 60% since their record peak last November. The fall erased a long-standing premium favored by momentum traders. However, the share has still increased by over 1,300% ever since CEO Saylor initiated its purchase of Bitcoin in 2020. The existing market conditions, however, dispute such trends.

Also Read | Bitcoin (BTC) Whale Owen Gunden Exits $1.3 billion BTC Holding as Institutions Raise ETF Stakes

Bitcoin Drop Weakens Strategy’s mNAV Ratio

The overall sell-off has affected its funding products. The yield of its 10.5% notes, issued in March, increased to 11.5%. The offering of its euro-denominated preferred stocks also traded below its discounted offering price. The price drop of 30% in Bitcoin has caused its ratio of MNAV to be above 1.1. 

Strategy’s long-standing presence in major benchmarks pushed Bitcoin exposure into mainstream portfolios. Passive ETF and mutual fund flows contributed to years of value and visibility. However, MSCI’s move is an indicator of changing sentiment.

Also Read | BlackRock Files Staked Ethereum ETF, Hinting at Explosive Yield Potential

Market Opportunity
WorldAssets Logo
WorldAssets Price(INC)
$0.5622
$0.5622$0.5622
+3.34%
USD
WorldAssets (INC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026?

The post What is the Outlook for Digital Assets in 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market cap reached $4.3 trillion in 2025 as institutions
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:23
Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach

The post Pudgy Penguins’ Non-Crypto Display Wraps Las Vegas Sphere, Potentially Elevating PENGU Brand Reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pudgy Penguins,
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 03:41