The post Why Bitcoin at $80K is a warning, not a buying opportunity! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is Bitcoin struggling to rebound after the October crash? Smart money have been offloading Bitcoin since Q4 began, keeping buying pressure muted and preventing a meaningful recovery. Could BTC face a bigger structural threat? If MSCI rules companies like MSTR are “funds,” passive indexers would dump positions, triggering the largest liquidation. Bitcoin’s latest drop is raising some serious questions. The move down to $81k has flipped the entire market narrative. For starters, analysts now interpret the recent smart-money distribution as a deliberate strategy rather than a classic “dip-buying” signal.  At the same time, some are rethinking the whole “store of value” argument, pointing to BTC’s evolution over the last decade as a factor behind this pullback. With all that in play, is a Bitcoin reversal still realistic? The October crash smart money saw coming Bitcoin capitulation is heating up. On the 21st of November, BTC saw roughly $3 billion in Net Realized Profit/Loss, marking the biggest net swing since the 2023 bear market. That pushed BTC down to $80k for the first time since the 11th of April. This, however, is part of the “aftermath” of the October crash. On-chain metrics have been bearish since Q4 kicked off, with large holders offloading BTC. That selling pressure is keeping any rebound stuck. Source: TradingView (BTC/USDT) Some might call this a classic “buy the dip” setup. And in theory, it makes sense: Bitcoin hit $126k just four days before the October crash. Long-term holders (LTHs) naturally used the opportunity to take profits.  But the market isn’t following the usual playbook.  Bitcoin [BTC] has now posted three lower lows, and there’s no clear bottom yet. In past cycles, corrections after the top gave smart money a chance to step in. But this time, that hasn’t happened. It leaves one big question:… The post Why Bitcoin at $80K is a warning, not a buying opportunity! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is Bitcoin struggling to rebound after the October crash? Smart money have been offloading Bitcoin since Q4 began, keeping buying pressure muted and preventing a meaningful recovery. Could BTC face a bigger structural threat? If MSCI rules companies like MSTR are “funds,” passive indexers would dump positions, triggering the largest liquidation. Bitcoin’s latest drop is raising some serious questions. The move down to $81k has flipped the entire market narrative. For starters, analysts now interpret the recent smart-money distribution as a deliberate strategy rather than a classic “dip-buying” signal.  At the same time, some are rethinking the whole “store of value” argument, pointing to BTC’s evolution over the last decade as a factor behind this pullback. With all that in play, is a Bitcoin reversal still realistic? The October crash smart money saw coming Bitcoin capitulation is heating up. On the 21st of November, BTC saw roughly $3 billion in Net Realized Profit/Loss, marking the biggest net swing since the 2023 bear market. That pushed BTC down to $80k for the first time since the 11th of April. This, however, is part of the “aftermath” of the October crash. On-chain metrics have been bearish since Q4 kicked off, with large holders offloading BTC. That selling pressure is keeping any rebound stuck. Source: TradingView (BTC/USDT) Some might call this a classic “buy the dip” setup. And in theory, it makes sense: Bitcoin hit $126k just four days before the October crash. Long-term holders (LTHs) naturally used the opportunity to take profits.  But the market isn’t following the usual playbook.  Bitcoin [BTC] has now posted three lower lows, and there’s no clear bottom yet. In past cycles, corrections after the top gave smart money a chance to step in. But this time, that hasn’t happened. It leaves one big question:…

Why Bitcoin at $80K is a warning, not a buying opportunity!

Key Takeaways

Why is Bitcoin struggling to rebound after the October crash?

Smart money have been offloading Bitcoin since Q4 began, keeping buying pressure muted and preventing a meaningful recovery.

Could BTC face a bigger structural threat?

If MSCI rules companies like MSTR are “funds,” passive indexers would dump positions, triggering the largest liquidation.


Bitcoin’s latest drop is raising some serious questions.

The move down to $81k has flipped the entire market narrative. For starters, analysts now interpret the recent smart-money distribution as a deliberate strategy rather than a classic “dip-buying” signal. 

At the same time, some are rethinking the whole “store of value” argument, pointing to BTC’s evolution over the last decade as a factor behind this pullback. With all that in play, is a Bitcoin reversal still realistic?

The October crash smart money saw coming

Bitcoin capitulation is heating up.

On the 21st of November, BTC saw roughly $3 billion in Net Realized Profit/Loss, marking the biggest net swing since the 2023 bear market. That pushed BTC down to $80k for the first time since the 11th of April.

This, however, is part of the “aftermath” of the October crash. On-chain metrics have been bearish since Q4 kicked off, with large holders offloading BTC. That selling pressure is keeping any rebound stuck.

Source: TradingView (BTC/USDT)

Some might call this a classic “buy the dip” setup. And in theory, it makes sense: Bitcoin hit $126k just four days before the October crash. Long-term holders (LTHs) naturally used the opportunity to take profits. 

But the market isn’t following the usual playbook. 

Bitcoin [BTC] has now posted three lower lows, and there’s no clear bottom yet. In past cycles, corrections after the top gave smart money a chance to step in. But this time, that hasn’t happened.

It leaves one big question: Was this crash really about trade wars, or did smart money spot something the rest of the market didn’t? How this plays out could decide if BTC’s rebound has fizzled, or if it’s just taking a pause.

Bitcoin faces its biggest structural threat yet

Looking at the macro signals, it’s clear the whales played it smart.

On the 10th of October, MSCI, the world’s second-biggest Index company questioned whether companies that hold crypto assets as their core business, should be considered as “companies” or “funds.”

If they’re treated as funds, passive indexers can’t touch them. The ruling drops on the 15th of January. If it goes through, names like MSTR get booted from indices, forcing passive holders to dump their positions.

Source: X

Against this setup, smart money’s distribution was a calculated move. 

The logic is simple: DATs, which have been driving most of this cycle’s buying, are now under scrutiny, especially MSTR, given its heavy Bitcoin exposure. Smart money saw this risk early, triggering a full-blown crash.

Hence, Bitcoin’s rebound is stalled until the hearing. 

If the ruling comes back negative, a massive liquidation wave could hit before index rebalancing, potentially the biggest structural threat Bitcoin has faced yet. In turn, this would put clear pressure on key support levels.

Next: Double Zero [2Z] surges 20%, but bulls lose fight: Is $0.16 breach possible?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/why-bitcoin-at-80k-is-a-warning-not-a-buying-opportunity/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0006131
$0.0006131$0.0006131
-6.26%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
Why Institutional Capital Chooses Gold Over Bitcoin Amid Yen Currency Crisis

Why Institutional Capital Chooses Gold Over Bitcoin Amid Yen Currency Crisis

TLDR: Yen’s managed devaluation artificially strengthens the dollar, creating headwinds for Bitcoin price action. Gold has surged 61.4% while Bitcoin stagnates
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/18 12:09
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36