The post XRP Lost 50% in Fundamental On-Chain Metric, But Beware appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stabilization or stagnation? Lack of fundamental growth One of the few on-chain metrics that truly matters for gauging actual network activity — payment volume — was just severely damaged by XRP. You cannot dismiss the roughly 50% decline in XRP’s account-to-account payment volume over the last month as market noise. Losing half of this metric in such a short period of time is an obvious indication of declining transactional demand because it shows actual value being moved through the ledger. Stabilization or stagnation? The information is displayed on the chart. Since late October, the payment count has been declining, moving from the recent band’s upper range to its lower end, as late November draws near. More importantly, following the mid-November spike, the payment volume chart shows a sharp decline. Instead of a sustained follow-through, the network experienced a clear cool-off following that spike. At the very least, volume should stabilize if demand for value transfer or settlement was increasing.  XRP/USDT Chart by TradingView A similar narrative is revealed by transaction count. Over the past week, the total number of transactions that have been completed has been steadily declining, and it is currently significantly below the average for November. On Nov. 24, the daily figure is approximately 686,000 transactions, a significant decrease from the previous rhythm of 1.2-1.5 million. The September-October dataset’s successful transaction count reveals months of erratic activity, with distinct declines that never fully recovered. Lack of fundamental growth The network is not currently growing its user base, which supports the main point. When the price structure and on-chain vulnerability are combined, the risk becomes clear. XRP is trading below all higher-time-frame moving averages, and trapped inside a wide declining channel. The RSI is just above oversold, which allows for minor bounces but not enough to buck a trend… The post XRP Lost 50% in Fundamental On-Chain Metric, But Beware appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stabilization or stagnation? Lack of fundamental growth One of the few on-chain metrics that truly matters for gauging actual network activity — payment volume — was just severely damaged by XRP. You cannot dismiss the roughly 50% decline in XRP’s account-to-account payment volume over the last month as market noise. Losing half of this metric in such a short period of time is an obvious indication of declining transactional demand because it shows actual value being moved through the ledger. Stabilization or stagnation? The information is displayed on the chart. Since late October, the payment count has been declining, moving from the recent band’s upper range to its lower end, as late November draws near. More importantly, following the mid-November spike, the payment volume chart shows a sharp decline. Instead of a sustained follow-through, the network experienced a clear cool-off following that spike. At the very least, volume should stabilize if demand for value transfer or settlement was increasing.  XRP/USDT Chart by TradingView A similar narrative is revealed by transaction count. Over the past week, the total number of transactions that have been completed has been steadily declining, and it is currently significantly below the average for November. On Nov. 24, the daily figure is approximately 686,000 transactions, a significant decrease from the previous rhythm of 1.2-1.5 million. The September-October dataset’s successful transaction count reveals months of erratic activity, with distinct declines that never fully recovered. Lack of fundamental growth The network is not currently growing its user base, which supports the main point. When the price structure and on-chain vulnerability are combined, the risk becomes clear. XRP is trading below all higher-time-frame moving averages, and trapped inside a wide declining channel. The RSI is just above oversold, which allows for minor bounces but not enough to buck a trend…

XRP Lost 50% in Fundamental On-Chain Metric, But Beware

  • Stabilization or stagnation?
  • Lack of fundamental growth

One of the few on-chain metrics that truly matters for gauging actual network activity — payment volume — was just severely damaged by XRP. You cannot dismiss the roughly 50% decline in XRP’s account-to-account payment volume over the last month as market noise. Losing half of this metric in such a short period of time is an obvious indication of declining transactional demand because it shows actual value being moved through the ledger.

Stabilization or stagnation?

The information is displayed on the chart. Since late October, the payment count has been declining, moving from the recent band’s upper range to its lower end, as late November draws near. More importantly, following the mid-November spike, the payment volume chart shows a sharp decline. Instead of a sustained follow-through, the network experienced a clear cool-off following that spike. At the very least, volume should stabilize if demand for value transfer or settlement was increasing. 

XRP/USDT Chart by TradingView

A similar narrative is revealed by transaction count. Over the past week, the total number of transactions that have been completed has been steadily declining, and it is currently significantly below the average for November. On Nov. 24, the daily figure is approximately 686,000 transactions, a significant decrease from the previous rhythm of 1.2-1.5 million. The September-October dataset’s successful transaction count reveals months of erratic activity, with distinct declines that never fully recovered.

Lack of fundamental growth

The network is not currently growing its user base, which supports the main point. When the price structure and on-chain vulnerability are combined, the risk becomes clear. XRP is trading below all higher-time-frame moving averages, and trapped inside a wide declining channel. The RSI is just above oversold, which allows for minor bounces but not enough to buck a trend that is being driven by declining fundamentals. 

You Might Also Like

The catch is that the price has not dropped proportionately, even though a key metric has been lost by 50%. There are two possible interpretations of that. Either traders believe this on-chain decline is fleeting noise, which is optimistic, or the market has not priced in the decline yet, which is risky.

The chart confirms ongoing downward pressure, and the fundamentals softened significantly. A genuine long-term recovery in payments and transaction volume, rather than merely a technical bounce, is necessary for any bullish reaction in this situation.

Source: https://u.today/xrp-lost-50-in-fundamental-on-chain-metric-but-beware

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$2.0496
$2.0496$2.0496
-0.06%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30