The post Pump.fun faces sharp losses despite 20B whale accumulation – Here’s why! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways What drove Pump.fun’s decline? Team wallets sent $436.5 million to exchanges while buybacks fell, weakening support and pressuring the price. How are PUMP whales reacting now? Top holders added 20 billion tokens, showing accumulation despite bearish momentum and a potential test near $0.0022. With the crypto market stuck in a prolonged downtrend, some altcoins, including Pump.fun, have taken heavy damage. Amid this pressure, the Pump.fun [PUMP] team sharply increased exchange deposits, raising renewed fears of dumping across the market. Pump.fun moved $436.5 million to exchanges Lookonchain data showed Pump.fun steadily offloaded USDC. It deposited $436.5 million USDC into Kraken since the 15th of October. During the same period, $537.6 million USDC flowed from Kraken to Circle via wallet DTQK7G. Source: Lookonchain Such heavy CEX transfers previously aligned with selling phases. Between the 19th of May 2024 and the 12th of August 2025, the team sold 4.19 million SOL worth $757 million. That history kept sentiment fragile. Investors generally interpret increased team-led exchange flows as bearish, which often encourages copycat selling from other holders. Buybacks fall sharply Pump.fun also scaled back token buybacks. Artemis data showed buyback spending dropped 36.5% to $886k, holding below the $1 million line. Source: Artemis That shift set up the reduced support, suggesting weaker team conviction as PUMP extended its decline. Without stabilizing flows, downside risk strengthened. Whales take the opposite stance Even so, whales used the drop to accumulate. Coinalyze showed buyers dominated 4 of the last 7 days, while sellers prevailed only twice. Source: Coinalyze PUMP recorded 39.23 billion in Buy Volume since the 20th of November, signaling broad Spot demand. On top of that, Nansen data showed Top Holders increased balances by 20 billion tokens during the same period. Balance Change also stayed positive, indicating minimal whale distribution. This accumulation, despite… The post Pump.fun faces sharp losses despite 20B whale accumulation – Here’s why! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways What drove Pump.fun’s decline? Team wallets sent $436.5 million to exchanges while buybacks fell, weakening support and pressuring the price. How are PUMP whales reacting now? Top holders added 20 billion tokens, showing accumulation despite bearish momentum and a potential test near $0.0022. With the crypto market stuck in a prolonged downtrend, some altcoins, including Pump.fun, have taken heavy damage. Amid this pressure, the Pump.fun [PUMP] team sharply increased exchange deposits, raising renewed fears of dumping across the market. Pump.fun moved $436.5 million to exchanges Lookonchain data showed Pump.fun steadily offloaded USDC. It deposited $436.5 million USDC into Kraken since the 15th of October. During the same period, $537.6 million USDC flowed from Kraken to Circle via wallet DTQK7G. Source: Lookonchain Such heavy CEX transfers previously aligned with selling phases. Between the 19th of May 2024 and the 12th of August 2025, the team sold 4.19 million SOL worth $757 million. That history kept sentiment fragile. Investors generally interpret increased team-led exchange flows as bearish, which often encourages copycat selling from other holders. Buybacks fall sharply Pump.fun also scaled back token buybacks. Artemis data showed buyback spending dropped 36.5% to $886k, holding below the $1 million line. Source: Artemis That shift set up the reduced support, suggesting weaker team conviction as PUMP extended its decline. Without stabilizing flows, downside risk strengthened. Whales take the opposite stance Even so, whales used the drop to accumulate. Coinalyze showed buyers dominated 4 of the last 7 days, while sellers prevailed only twice. Source: Coinalyze PUMP recorded 39.23 billion in Buy Volume since the 20th of November, signaling broad Spot demand. On top of that, Nansen data showed Top Holders increased balances by 20 billion tokens during the same period. Balance Change also stayed positive, indicating minimal whale distribution. This accumulation, despite…

Pump.fun faces sharp losses despite 20B whale accumulation – Here’s why!

Key Takeaways

What drove Pump.fun’s decline?

Team wallets sent $436.5 million to exchanges while buybacks fell, weakening support and pressuring the price.

How are PUMP whales reacting now?

Top holders added 20 billion tokens, showing accumulation despite bearish momentum and a potential test near $0.0022.


With the crypto market stuck in a prolonged downtrend, some altcoins, including Pump.fun, have taken heavy damage.

Amid this pressure, the Pump.fun [PUMP] team sharply increased exchange deposits, raising renewed fears of dumping across the market.

Pump.fun moved $436.5 million to exchanges

Lookonchain data showed Pump.fun steadily offloaded USDC. It deposited $436.5 million USDC into Kraken since the 15th of October.

During the same period, $537.6 million USDC flowed from Kraken to Circle via wallet DTQK7G.

Source: Lookonchain

Such heavy CEX transfers previously aligned with selling phases. Between the 19th of May 2024 and the 12th of August 2025, the team sold 4.19 million SOL worth $757 million.

That history kept sentiment fragile. Investors generally interpret increased team-led exchange flows as bearish, which often encourages copycat selling from other holders.

Buybacks fall sharply

Pump.fun also scaled back token buybacks. Artemis data showed buyback spending dropped 36.5% to $886k, holding below the $1 million line.

Source: Artemis

That shift set up the reduced support, suggesting weaker team conviction as PUMP extended its decline. Without stabilizing flows, downside risk strengthened.

Whales take the opposite stance

Even so, whales used the drop to accumulate. Coinalyze showed buyers dominated 4 of the last 7 days, while sellers prevailed only twice.

Source: Coinalyze

PUMP recorded 39.23 billion in Buy Volume since the 20th of November, signaling broad Spot demand.

On top of that, Nansen data showed Top Holders increased balances by 20 billion tokens during the same period. Balance Change also stayed positive, indicating minimal whale distribution.

This accumulation, despite poor price actio,n suggested whales anticipated future appreciation.

Source: Nansen

Dip or reversal?

PUMP rejected $0.0048 two weeks ago and traded inside a descending channel, hitting a $0.0024 low. At press time, the token traded at $0.0026, down 3.76% on the day and 21.3% on the week.

The DMI Stochastic Momentum Index dropped to -55, while the histogram turned deeply negative. PUMP also traded below its EMA20, EMA50, EMA100, and EMA200, confirming strong bearish momentum.

Market conditions still exposed PUMP to more losses.

Source: TradingView

If Pump.fun continues selling and whales fail to absorb supply, PUMP could slide toward $0.0022.

A successful reversal would require buyers to reclaim $0.0030 and push toward the EMA20 at $0.0033.

Next: DOGE ETF debuts during one of Dogecoin’s worst quarters – What next?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/pump-fun-faces-sharp-losses-despite-20b-whale-accumulation-heres-why/

Market Opportunity
pump.fun Logo
pump.fun Price(PUMP)
$0,002737
$0,002737$0,002737
+%0,18
USD
pump.fun (PUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30