The post DeFi yield aggregator Yearn discloses September incident in yUSND vault appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Yearn, a DeFi stalwart offering set-and-forget yield vaults, has announced an incident involving its yUSND vault on the Arbitrum network. The disclosure comes from pseudonymous Yearn contributor johnnyonline who explains that “insufficient USND liquidity” led to “severe slippage” in swapping liquidation rewards, one of the strategy’s yield sources. The incident was confined to the vault’s rETH Stability Pool Strategy, to which 28% of its assets are allocated. Losses were relatively small, especially by DeFi’s standards, at just over $25,000 in USND. This represents a “5.2% drawdown for yUSND depositors.” The post reassures users that Yearn has fully covered losses to protect user principal, and that “only the vault’s realized yield potential was impacted.” Despite the team disclosing the incident on November 26, it occurred on September 28, with losses covered on October 11. Going forward, similar strategies will offload collateral in “smaller tranches” to reduce the risk of slippage-related losses. An additional “price-guard mechanism” is also in place to act as a circuit breaker. Read more: High yields to haircuts: Has DeFi learned anything from yield vault collapse? The DeFi risk landscape Launched in 2020 as iearn Finance, “DeFi’s Yield Aggregator” hit a peak of $6.9 billion total-value locked (TVL) in late 2021. It currently holds $343 million, according to DeFiLlama data. DeFi is often thought of as a wild-west corner of the already risky wider crypto sector. But many users consider certain long-standing, battle-tested protocols as “blue-chips,” or a safe pairs of hands: Aave for lending, Lido for liquid staking, Yearn for yield. This distinction became clear during the recent spectacular collapse of degen yield vaults such as Stream Finance. Pseudonymous Yearn contributor Schlagonia was among those who raised the alarm over Stream’s xUSD and Elixir’s deUSD “recursively minting” each other’s assets. They called the system a “daisy chain”… The post DeFi yield aggregator Yearn discloses September incident in yUSND vault appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Yearn, a DeFi stalwart offering set-and-forget yield vaults, has announced an incident involving its yUSND vault on the Arbitrum network. The disclosure comes from pseudonymous Yearn contributor johnnyonline who explains that “insufficient USND liquidity” led to “severe slippage” in swapping liquidation rewards, one of the strategy’s yield sources. The incident was confined to the vault’s rETH Stability Pool Strategy, to which 28% of its assets are allocated. Losses were relatively small, especially by DeFi’s standards, at just over $25,000 in USND. This represents a “5.2% drawdown for yUSND depositors.” The post reassures users that Yearn has fully covered losses to protect user principal, and that “only the vault’s realized yield potential was impacted.” Despite the team disclosing the incident on November 26, it occurred on September 28, with losses covered on October 11. Going forward, similar strategies will offload collateral in “smaller tranches” to reduce the risk of slippage-related losses. An additional “price-guard mechanism” is also in place to act as a circuit breaker. Read more: High yields to haircuts: Has DeFi learned anything from yield vault collapse? The DeFi risk landscape Launched in 2020 as iearn Finance, “DeFi’s Yield Aggregator” hit a peak of $6.9 billion total-value locked (TVL) in late 2021. It currently holds $343 million, according to DeFiLlama data. DeFi is often thought of as a wild-west corner of the already risky wider crypto sector. But many users consider certain long-standing, battle-tested protocols as “blue-chips,” or a safe pairs of hands: Aave for lending, Lido for liquid staking, Yearn for yield. This distinction became clear during the recent spectacular collapse of degen yield vaults such as Stream Finance. Pseudonymous Yearn contributor Schlagonia was among those who raised the alarm over Stream’s xUSD and Elixir’s deUSD “recursively minting” each other’s assets. They called the system a “daisy chain”…

DeFi yield aggregator Yearn discloses September incident in yUSND vault

Yearn, a DeFi stalwart offering set-and-forget yield vaults, has announced an incident involving its yUSND vault on the Arbitrum network.

The disclosure comes from pseudonymous Yearn contributor johnnyonline who explains that “insufficient USND liquidity” led to “severe slippage” in swapping liquidation rewards, one of the strategy’s yield sources.

The incident was confined to the vault’s rETH Stability Pool Strategy, to which 28% of its assets are allocated.

Losses were relatively small, especially by DeFi’s standards, at just over $25,000 in USND. This represents a “5.2% drawdown for yUSND depositors.”

The post reassures users that Yearn has fully covered losses to protect user principal, and that “only the vault’s realized yield potential was impacted.”

Despite the team disclosing the incident on November 26, it occurred on September 28, with losses covered on October 11.

Going forward, similar strategies will offload collateral in “smaller tranches” to reduce the risk of slippage-related losses. An additional “price-guard mechanism” is also in place to act as a circuit breaker.

Read more: High yields to haircuts: Has DeFi learned anything from yield vault collapse?

The DeFi risk landscape

Launched in 2020 as iearn Finance, “DeFi’s Yield Aggregator” hit a peak of $6.9 billion total-value locked (TVL) in late 2021. It currently holds $343 million, according to DeFiLlama data.

DeFi is often thought of as a wild-west corner of the already risky wider crypto sector. But many users consider certain long-standing, battle-tested protocols as “blue-chips,” or a safe pairs of hands: Aave for lending, Lido for liquid staking, Yearn for yield.

This distinction became clear during the recent spectacular collapse of degen yield vaults such as Stream Finance.

Pseudonymous Yearn contributor Schlagonia was among those who raised the alarm over Stream’s xUSD and Elixir’s deUSD “recursively minting” each other’s assets.

They called the system a “daisy chain” in which “recursive self minting and lending fuel[ed] basically all of the ‘growth’.”

That’s not to say, however, that Yearn hasn’t had its fair share of issues; today’s announcement marks the project’s fourth incident since launch.

Read more: DeFi projects under fire for inflated TVL and murky lending loops

Yearn’s burns

In February 2021, a flash-loan attack caused $11 million in losses to Yearn’s DAI v1 vault, with the hacker profiting just $2.8 million.

Read more: DeFi platform Yearn exploits itself, begs for money back

Two years later, in April 2023, the exploit of a three year-old vulnerability caused a further $11.4 million loss, due to a copy-paste error in the list of yUSDT’s underlying assets.

Later that same year, in December, a “faulty multisig script” led to the loss of $1.4 million for the project’s treasury.

Also chalked up to “significant slippage,” the swap accidentally contained he project’s entire yCRV token balance, rather than just the earned fees.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/defi-yield-aggregator-yearn-discloses-september-incident-in-yusnd-vault/

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000539
$0.000539$0.000539
+1.50%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
The whale "pension-usdt.eth" has reduced its ETH long positions by 10,000 coins, and its futures account has made a profit of $4.18 million in the past day.

The whale "pension-usdt.eth" has reduced its ETH long positions by 10,000 coins, and its futures account has made a profit of $4.18 million in the past day.

PANews reported on January 14th that, according to Hyperbot data monitoring, the whale "pension-usdt.eth" reduced its ETH long positions by 10,000 ETH in the past
Share
PANews2026/01/14 13:45
Senator Warren Tells OCC to Stop World Liberty Bank Review Amid Trump Ties

Senator Warren Tells OCC to Stop World Liberty Bank Review Amid Trump Ties

The post Senator Warren Tells OCC to Stop World Liberty Bank Review Amid Trump Ties appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has called
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 12:55