Officials of SYMS Construction and IM Construction are the latest to face tax evasion complaints over anomalous flood control projectsOfficials of SYMS Construction and IM Construction are the latest to face tax evasion complaints over anomalous flood control projects

BIR files tax evasion complaints vs contractors of Bulacan ghost projects

2025/11/27 14:32

MANILA, Philippines – The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) on Thursday, November 27, filed fresh tax evasion complaints with the Department of Justice against two construction firms implicated in the multi-billion flood control corruption scandal.

The bureau filed two complaints for alleged violation of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) against Sally Santos, proprietor of the controversial SYMS Construction Trading. The BIR accused Santos of the following alleged acts:

  • Tax evasion under Section 254 of the NIRC, punishable by a fine of not less than P500,000, but not more than P10 million; and imprisonment not less than six years, but not more than 10 years
  • Failure to supply correct and accurate information under the code’s Section 255, punishable by fine of not less than P10,000; imprisonment of not less than one year, but not more than 10 years

SYMS, a Bulacan-based firm, is behind some of the ghost flood control projects flagged by government agencies. Some of the contractor’s projects were also either poorly built or overstated. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. earlier ordered SYMS’ blacklisting.

The BIR’s complaints are hinged on the P57.73-million project for the construction of a reinforced river wall in Barangay Piel, Baliuag, Bulacan, awarded to the firm. This project was under the watch of the controversial Department of Public Works and Highways Bulacan 1st District Engineering Office then headed by Henry Alcantara.

Upon government inspection, agents found out that no project was built on the supposed location of the multi-billion contract. The BIR added that as of June 30, 2025, 100% of the contract price, amounting to P57 million, was already given to Santos.

“Since the project was found to have no actual accomplishment, no deductions should be claimed therefrom. Hence, the ratable input tax attributable to the aforesaid should be disallowed,” the bureau said.

Play Video BIR files tax evasion complaints vs contractors of Bulacan ghost projects
Another firm

The BIR also filed the same set of tax evasion complaints against IM Construction Corporation and its corporate officers, including its president Roberto Tecson Imperio and treasurer Marie Jane Manalo Imperio.

The firm, according to the bureau, has a total P7.4-million tax deficiency: P5,601,601.42 (income tax deficiency) and P1,811,989.13 (value added tax deficiency).

The complaints stemmed from the construction of a pumping station and a flood gate in Barangay Santo Rosario, Hagonoy, Bulacan, awarded on October 14, 2024, and cost P16,284,357.75. Similar to the SYMS’ case, this contract turned out to be a ghost project.

“Since the project was found to have no actual accomplishment, no deductions should be claimed therefrom. Hence, the ratable cost and input tax attributable to the aforesaid project should be disallowed,” the BIR said.

“As a result of Respondent IM’s deliberate reporting of fictitious deductions and non-existent project costs, IM Construction failed to pay the correct amount of taxes which resulted in the deprivation of the much-needed taxes due to the government,” it added.

These are the latest tax evasion complaints filed in relation to the flood control anomaly.

On November 6, the BIR filed three separate tax evasion complaints against former DPWH engineers Alcantara, Brice Hernandez, and Jaypee Mendoza over a P1.6-billion tax liability.

Play Video BIR files tax evasion complaints vs contractors of Bulacan ghost projects

The BIR also filed seven counts of tax evasion complaints on October 8 against Sarah and Curlee Discaya, and a corporate officer of their firm, St. Gerrard Construction General Contractor and Development Corporation, over a P7.1-billion tax liability. – Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

The post OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed that nine major U.S. banks engaged in debanking practices from 2020 to 2023, restricting access for digital asset firms and other sectors. This marks the first official acknowledgment of these policies, which limited services based on customer types, affecting crypto businesses significantly. OCC report highlights inappropriate distinctions by banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, targeting crypto and high-risk sectors. Nine banks reviewed showed similar policies restricting customer access without objective risk assessments. Impacted industries include digital asset firms, with potential referrals to the Attorney General for unlawful practices. Discover how major U.S. banks’ debanking policies hit crypto firms hard, per OCC’s 2025 report. Learn the implications for digital assets and what regulators are doing next—stay informed on banking risks today! What Are the OCC’s Findings on Banks Debanking Crypto Firms? Banks debanking crypto firms involves major financial institutions limiting or denying services to digital asset businesses based on perceived risks, as detailed in a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) report. From 2020 to 2023, nine of the largest U.S. banks implemented policies that required escalated reviews or outright restrictions for certain customers, including those in the crypto sector. This practice, now publicly confirmed, underscores ongoing tensions between traditional banking and emerging digital asset industries. How Did These Debanking Practices Affect Digital Asset Companies? The OCC’s six-page report, released on Wednesday, revealed that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made distinctions among customers that were deemed inappropriate. For digital asset firms, this meant heightened scrutiny or complete denial of banking services, hindering operations in an already volatile market. The regulator noted that these policies spanned…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 11:01