The post Upbit Solana Hot Wallet Hack Drains $36.8M, Services Frozen appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange is dealing with a major security incident after unauthorized activity drained millions in Solana-based assets. Upbit said abnormal withdrawals appeared on the Solana network early on November 27, triggering an emergency shutdown of deposits and withdrawals.  The event has drawn intense attention because it comes during a critical regulatory period in South Korea and only days after officials increased scrutiny on AML and KYC procedures across major exchanges. Besides the immediate market impact, the breach again raises questions about the security of hot wallets on high-throughput chains such as Solana. Details of the Solana Hot Wallet Incident According to Upbit’s incident review, one Solana hot wallet experienced unusual activity around 4:42 a.m. KST. The transfers moved roughly 54 billion Korean won, equal to about $36.8 million, into an unknown external address. The drained assets included a wide range of Solana tokens. These included SOL, USDC, BONK, JUP, ORCA, PYTH, RAY, JTO, TRUMP, RENDER, and several smaller ecosystem tokens. Upbit responded by freezing all Solana deposits and withdrawals. Additionally, the exchange moved remaining Solana assets into cold wallets to stop further unauthorized transfers.  The company has already secured around 12 billion won in frozen tokens with help from project teams and blockchain analytics firms. The remaining assets are under constant on-chain monitoring as investigators work to trace the funds. Upbit stressed that the breach affected only one Solana hot wallet. Other networks and core systems continued operating normally. However, a full security review is underway across its entire digital asset infrastructure before services resume. Broader Context and Industry Reaction The timing of the attack adds new pressure on Upbit and its parent company, Dunamu. The firm is currently preparing a major stock-swap combination with Naver Financial valued at about $10.3 billion. Hence, the breach has become… The post Upbit Solana Hot Wallet Hack Drains $36.8M, Services Frozen appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange is dealing with a major security incident after unauthorized activity drained millions in Solana-based assets. Upbit said abnormal withdrawals appeared on the Solana network early on November 27, triggering an emergency shutdown of deposits and withdrawals.  The event has drawn intense attention because it comes during a critical regulatory period in South Korea and only days after officials increased scrutiny on AML and KYC procedures across major exchanges. Besides the immediate market impact, the breach again raises questions about the security of hot wallets on high-throughput chains such as Solana. Details of the Solana Hot Wallet Incident According to Upbit’s incident review, one Solana hot wallet experienced unusual activity around 4:42 a.m. KST. The transfers moved roughly 54 billion Korean won, equal to about $36.8 million, into an unknown external address. The drained assets included a wide range of Solana tokens. These included SOL, USDC, BONK, JUP, ORCA, PYTH, RAY, JTO, TRUMP, RENDER, and several smaller ecosystem tokens. Upbit responded by freezing all Solana deposits and withdrawals. Additionally, the exchange moved remaining Solana assets into cold wallets to stop further unauthorized transfers.  The company has already secured around 12 billion won in frozen tokens with help from project teams and blockchain analytics firms. The remaining assets are under constant on-chain monitoring as investigators work to trace the funds. Upbit stressed that the breach affected only one Solana hot wallet. Other networks and core systems continued operating normally. However, a full security review is underway across its entire digital asset infrastructure before services resume. Broader Context and Industry Reaction The timing of the attack adds new pressure on Upbit and its parent company, Dunamu. The firm is currently preparing a major stock-swap combination with Naver Financial valued at about $10.3 billion. Hence, the breach has become…

Upbit Solana Hot Wallet Hack Drains $36.8M, Services Frozen

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange is dealing with a major security incident after unauthorized activity drained millions in Solana-based assets. Upbit said abnormal withdrawals appeared on the Solana network early on November 27, triggering an emergency shutdown of deposits and withdrawals. 

The event has drawn intense attention because it comes during a critical regulatory period in South Korea and only days after officials increased scrutiny on AML and KYC procedures across major exchanges. Besides the immediate market impact, the breach again raises questions about the security of hot wallets on high-throughput chains such as Solana.

Details of the Solana Hot Wallet Incident

According to Upbit’s incident review, one Solana hot wallet experienced unusual activity around 4:42 a.m. KST. The transfers moved roughly 54 billion Korean won, equal to about $36.8 million, into an unknown external address. The drained assets included a wide range of Solana tokens. These included SOL, USDC, BONK, JUP, ORCA, PYTH, RAY, JTO, TRUMP, RENDER, and several smaller ecosystem tokens.

Upbit responded by freezing all Solana deposits and withdrawals. Additionally, the exchange moved remaining Solana assets into cold wallets to stop further unauthorized transfers. 

The company has already secured around 12 billion won in frozen tokens with help from project teams and blockchain analytics firms. The remaining assets are under constant on-chain monitoring as investigators work to trace the funds.

Upbit stressed that the breach affected only one Solana hot wallet. Other networks and core systems continued operating normally. However, a full security review is underway across its entire digital asset infrastructure before services resume.

Broader Context and Industry Reaction

The timing of the attack adds new pressure on Upbit and its parent company, Dunamu. The firm is currently preparing a major stock-swap combination with Naver Financial valued at about $10.3 billion. Hence, the breach has become a focal point for market observers tracking regulatory stability and operational risk in South Korea’s digital asset sector.

This incident also mirrors a previous Upbit breach in late November 2019, when hackers stole 342,000 ETH. Consequently, analysts argue that hot wallets still pose persistent vulnerabilities despite better security standards.

Solana Price Holds Steady Despite Security Shock

Solana’s market performance showed surprising strength even as the hack gained attention. SOL traded near $142, marking a slight daily gain. According to analyst Ali Martinez, Solana’s NUPL chart indicates deeper capitulation over recent weeks. 

Source: X

He noted that SOL often forms major bottoms during extended loss phases. The asset recently moved toward the $80–$95 demand range, where past reversals occurred during strong fear cycles.

Moreover, Martinez explained that previous capitulation periods often preceded recoveries toward higher resistance zones. If buyers defend lower levels, SOL could revisit the $110 and $138 regions. The hack did little to change this broader trend, although short-term caution persists.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/12700/upbit-halts-solana-transfers-after-36-8-million-hot-wallet-breach

Market Opportunity
Holo Token Logo
Holo Token Price(HOT)
$0.0004521
$0.0004521$0.0004521
+2.72%
USD
Holo Token (HOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Pro Global Scales Latin American Hub as Hybrid Model Accelerates Latin America Growth

Pro Global Scales Latin American Hub as Hybrid Model Accelerates Latin America Growth

Pro Global is accelerating its expansion in Latin America, with investment in its regional head office in Argentina as both international and domestic carriers
Share
ffnews2026/03/23 08:00
Tokenized deposits push Europe toward next-gen digital money

Tokenized deposits push Europe toward next-gen digital money

The post Tokenized deposits push Europe toward next-gen digital money appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As banks rewire payments and settlement systems, tokenized
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/23 18:29