THE BUREAU of Internal Revenue (BIR) has filed tax evasion complaints against two Bulacan-based contractors allegedly involved in “ghost” flood control projects. In a statement on Thursday, the agency said newly appointed BIR Commissioner Charlito Martin R. Mendoza lodged criminal complaints against IM Construction Corp. and SYMS Construction Trading before the Department of Justice (DoJ) […]THE BUREAU of Internal Revenue (BIR) has filed tax evasion complaints against two Bulacan-based contractors allegedly involved in “ghost” flood control projects. In a statement on Thursday, the agency said newly appointed BIR Commissioner Charlito Martin R. Mendoza lodged criminal complaints against IM Construction Corp. and SYMS Construction Trading before the Department of Justice (DoJ) […]

Bulacan contractors tied to ‘ghost’ projects face tax evasion raps — BIR

THE BUREAU of Internal Revenue (BIR) has filed tax evasion complaints against two Bulacan-based contractors allegedly involved in “ghost” flood control projects.

In a statement on Thursday, the agency said newly appointed BIR Commissioner Charlito Martin R. Mendoza lodged criminal complaints against IM Construction Corp. and SYMS Construction Trading before the Department of Justice (DoJ) over fictitious expenses, underreported income, and false value-added tax declarations.

The BIR said combined assessments for IM Construction and SYMS Construction amounted to P13.8 million in total tax deficiencies.

“The BIR will not allow contractors to enrich themselves through fake projects and falsified tax filings. We will pursue every offender, recover every peso, and continue filing criminal charges until this practice ends,” said Mr. Mendoza, who assumed office on Nov. 13.

The two firms were charged with violation of Section 254 of the tax code or tax evasion, and Section 255 or willful failure to supply correct and accurate information.

The BIR said IM Construction Corp. received payments for the construction of a pumping station and flood gate in Barangay Sto. Rosario, Hagonoy, Bulacan.

However, physical verification confirmed that no structure of any kind was built, it said. The company’s claimed project costs, deductions, and input taxes were entirely fictitious, resulting in significant tax deficiencies, it added.

“These false declarations constitute a deliberate, willful attempt to evade taxes while misusing public funds intended for critical flood control infrastructure,” the BIR said.

A separate BIR investigation showed SYMS Construction Trading collected the full contract amount for a reinforced river wall in Barangay Piel, Baliuag, Bulacan but inspectors found no river wall at the site.

“Because the project had no actual accomplishment, the taxpayer had no legal basis to claim deductions or input taxes. The false filings submitted by SYMS Construction Trading reflect a clear, intentional effort to conceal income and evade taxes derived from a fully paid but nonexistent government project,” the agency said.

The BIR has now filed a total of 12 criminal complaints linked to anomalous flood control projects, with estimated total potential tax liabilities of P8.87 billion under investigation.

Separately, Public Works Secretary Vivencio “Vince” B. Dizon said the two contractors are also facing bid-rigging and bid manipulation complaints. — Aubrey Rose A. Inosante

Market Opportunity
GhostwareOS Logo
GhostwareOS Price(GHOST)
$0.001563
$0.001563$0.001563
-6.90%
USD
GhostwareOS (GHOST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

Detail: https://coincu.com/pr/5-top-crypto-to-invest-in-2025-from-bnb-to-blockchainfx-who-holds-the-crown/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/25 05:30
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00