The post Khabib’s $4.4M NFT sale sparks feud as McGregor slams ‘crypto scam’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways What triggered the latest clash between McGregor and Khabib?  McGregor accused Khabib’s Papakha NFT project of being a scam after promotional posts were deleted. What broader issue does this feud highlight in the crypto space?  It underscores rising concerns over celebrity accountability and growing regulatory scrutiny of NFT projects. Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov are clashing once again, this time, not in the cage but over cryptocurrency. McGregor calls out Khabib On the 26th of November, McGregor accused the retired champion of running a scam using digital collectibles. The controversy stems from Khabib’s new “Papakha” NFTs, digital versions of his iconic hat, sold via Telegram. Last weekend, Nurmagomedov promoted the collection, which honored the traditional headpiece linked to his undefeated UFC career. The drop featured 29,000 NFTs and reportedly generated over $4.4 million in just 25 hours. Yet, soon after the sale ended, the promotional posts were deleted, catching McGregor’s eye and prompting a swift attack. How did this controversy start? McGregor accused Khabib of using Dagestani culture and his late father’s name to take money from fans before wiping the evidence. He launched his attack on X (formerly Twitter), though the post has since been deleted, writing: “There is just no way good guy Khabib used his late father’s name, as well as Dagestan’s culture, to scam his fans and fire sell a bunch of digital NFT’s online and then delete all of the content after they were sold, leaving his fans robbed of their money?” Expressing further added, “There is just no way good guy do this. Father’s plan has now become Father’s scam. Very sad.” Source: X Khabib swiftly fired back, branding McGregor “an absolute liar.” He defended the NFT project as a heartfelt tribute to his late father, Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov, and a digital keepsake honoring… The post Khabib’s $4.4M NFT sale sparks feud as McGregor slams ‘crypto scam’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways What triggered the latest clash between McGregor and Khabib?  McGregor accused Khabib’s Papakha NFT project of being a scam after promotional posts were deleted. What broader issue does this feud highlight in the crypto space?  It underscores rising concerns over celebrity accountability and growing regulatory scrutiny of NFT projects. Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov are clashing once again, this time, not in the cage but over cryptocurrency. McGregor calls out Khabib On the 26th of November, McGregor accused the retired champion of running a scam using digital collectibles. The controversy stems from Khabib’s new “Papakha” NFTs, digital versions of his iconic hat, sold via Telegram. Last weekend, Nurmagomedov promoted the collection, which honored the traditional headpiece linked to his undefeated UFC career. The drop featured 29,000 NFTs and reportedly generated over $4.4 million in just 25 hours. Yet, soon after the sale ended, the promotional posts were deleted, catching McGregor’s eye and prompting a swift attack. How did this controversy start? McGregor accused Khabib of using Dagestani culture and his late father’s name to take money from fans before wiping the evidence. He launched his attack on X (formerly Twitter), though the post has since been deleted, writing: “There is just no way good guy Khabib used his late father’s name, as well as Dagestan’s culture, to scam his fans and fire sell a bunch of digital NFT’s online and then delete all of the content after they were sold, leaving his fans robbed of their money?” Expressing further added, “There is just no way good guy do this. Father’s plan has now become Father’s scam. Very sad.” Source: X Khabib swiftly fired back, branding McGregor “an absolute liar.” He defended the NFT project as a heartfelt tribute to his late father, Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov, and a digital keepsake honoring…

Khabib’s $4.4M NFT sale sparks feud as McGregor slams ‘crypto scam’

Key takeaways

What triggered the latest clash between McGregor and Khabib? 

McGregor accused Khabib’s Papakha NFT project of being a scam after promotional posts were deleted.

What broader issue does this feud highlight in the crypto space? 

It underscores rising concerns over celebrity accountability and growing regulatory scrutiny of NFT projects.


Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov are clashing once again, this time, not in the cage but over cryptocurrency.

McGregor calls out Khabib

On the 26th of November, McGregor accused the retired champion of running a scam using digital collectibles.

The controversy stems from Khabib’s new “Papakha” NFTs, digital versions of his iconic hat, sold via Telegram. Last weekend, Nurmagomedov promoted the collection, which honored the traditional headpiece linked to his undefeated UFC career.

The drop featured 29,000 NFTs and reportedly generated over $4.4 million in just 25 hours. Yet, soon after the sale ended, the promotional posts were deleted, catching McGregor’s eye and prompting a swift attack.

How did this controversy start?

McGregor accused Khabib of using Dagestani culture and his late father’s name to take money from fans before wiping the evidence.

He launched his attack on X (formerly Twitter), though the post has since been deleted, writing:

Expressing further added,

Source: X

Khabib swiftly fired back, branding McGregor “an absolute liar.”

He defended the NFT project as a heartfelt tribute to his late father, Abdulmanap Nurmagomedov, and a digital keepsake honoring Dagestani tradition, insisting it was never intended as a speculative cash-grab.

ZachXBT turned the tables

However, the debate took an interesting turn when on-chain investigator ZachXBT joined in. The investigator didn’t defend Khabib, but instead targeted McGregor’s own history.

ZachXBT reposted McGregor’s accusations alongside details of the Irishman’s own 2022 NFT project, “McGregor Realm,” which also received heavy promotion before quietly disappearing similarly.

The investigator simply quoted, before later deleting the post,

This back-and-forth instantly revived one of MMA’s most bitter rivalries, while also exposing the broader challenge of celebrity accountability in the crypto world.

This six-year-old feud has evolved into a digital war, even though one man retired undefeated, and the other is plotting a comeback after a career-halting injury.

What’s more?

This controversy comes as the global crypto market cap is recovering, regaining the $3.12 trillion mark, at press time, boosted by Bitcoin’s price surge above $90,000.

However, the celebrity dispute reflects a growing regulatory risk.

In the UK, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) recently arrested two people after the £21 million collapse of Basis Markets, a crypto-investment scheme built around NFTs.

Investigators report that promoters promised investors algorithmic trading returns through NFT-based “membership access,” but diverted the funds instead.

All these events confirm that NFTs are exiting their regulatory “grey zone.”

Now, whether this was simply a failed celebrity NFT launch or something far more coordinated, only time will tell.

Next: Branding crisis? Polygon mulls returning to its former ‘MATIC’ name

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/khabibs-4-4m-nft-sale-sparks-feud-as-mcgregor-slams-crypto-scam/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.008966
$0.008966$0.008966
-7.41%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Structural job strain caps rand gains – Commerzbank

Structural job strain caps rand gains – Commerzbank

The post Structural job strain caps rand gains – Commerzbank appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Commerzbank’s Volkmar Baur highlights that South Africa’s unemployment
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/19 05:27
Trump gushes over Nicki Minaj's skin to mark Black History Month: 'So beautiful'

Trump gushes over Nicki Minaj's skin to mark Black History Month: 'So beautiful'

President Donald Trump used an event marking Black History Month to remark on Nicki Minaj's complexion."I love Nikki Minaj," the president told the audience. "She
Share
Rawstory2026/02/19 05:07
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00