S&P downgrades Tether's USDT due to volatile asset risks; CEO responds defiantly.S&P downgrades Tether's USDT due to volatile asset risks; CEO responds defiantly.

Tether’s USDT Downgraded by S&P Over Asset Risks

2025/11/28 04:45
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Tether's USDT Downgraded by S&P Over Asset Risks
Key Points:
  • S&P downgrades Tether’s USDT rating to lowest possible.
  • Reserve composition raises liquidity concerns.
  • CEO Ardoino challenges legacy finance models.

S&P Global downgraded Tether’s USDT stablecoin to its lowest rating, citing risks from holdings in Bitcoin and gold. Tether owns over $10 billion in Bitcoin and 116 tons of gold, challenging its one-to-one dollar redemption promise.

Tether’s USDT has been downgraded by S&P Global Ratings to the lowest stability rating due to its increased exposure to volatile assets like Bitcoin and gold.

S&P’s downgrade reflects concerns about Tether’s asset volatility, prompting industry examination. Market sensitivity increases as Tether deviates from traditional reserve models.

S&P downgraded Tether’s USDT stablecoin citing significant risks due to reserve assets, including Bitcoin and gold, impacting stability. Increased holdings of these assets pose liquidity challenges, especially under financial stress conditions.

The key player involved, Tether’s CEO Paolo Ardoino, defended the company’s strategy and criticized traditional rating methods.

Tether’s reserves include substantial Bitcoin, gold, and loans, drawing comparisons with national reserves.

Investors and markets might encounter increased volatility due to reliance on USDT for liquidity. S&P’s critical perspective highlights potential shifts in stablecoin trust dynamics in cryptocurrency markets.

Public response includes skepticism towards S&P’s criteria, while regulatory bodies have made no immediate public statements. The balancing act between innovation and stability emerges as a critical discussion point.

Potential outcomes involve changes in regulatory scrutiny and investment strategies within the crypto industry. Historical trends show asset reassessment tendencies, possibly impacting future stablecoin policies significantly.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12
XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

The post XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP Builds Multi-Year Base as Whales Accumulate and Volume
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/21 00:04