The IMF warns that tokenization threatens to deepen flash crashes despite promises of faster and lower-cost markets, prompting government intervention.The IMF warns that tokenization threatens to deepen flash crashes despite promises of faster and lower-cost markets, prompting government intervention.

IMF warns tokenization could deepen flash crashes and spur government intervention

2025/11/28 23:15
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The IMF warns that tokenization threatens to deepen flash crashes despite promises of faster and lower-cost markets, prompting government intervention. Senior IMF economist Itai Agur notes that the nature of tokenized markets allows chains of programs to be stacked on top of each other, presenting opportunities for exponential failure (a domino effect).

Another risk is that many markets could emerge, and if their tokens lack interoperability, markets could become more fragmented. The problem here is that fragmentation may cause markets to fail to deliver faster and cheaper trading, Agur emphasises. 

The fund’s economist also notes that specific policies may be required for tokenization to truly deliver on its promises while limiting risks. He added that governments have rarely been content to stay on the sidelines during necessary adaptations of money, pointing out that governments may take a more active role in the future of tokenization.

IMF’s Agur partly defends tokenization

The senior economist explained that people need money to buy, consume, and save, and owning assets is one common way to save. Meanwhile, he noted that tokens can facilitate faster and cheaper transactions for buying, owning, and selling assets.

According to Agur, tokenized markets help avoid the long chain of intermediaries typically involved in most transactions between investors and companies, such as buying corporate stocks or bonds. He also noted that most conventional transactions, which require a go-between such as a clearinghouse or registrar, have more extended waiting periods for completion. Stressing that time is money in finance.

However, Agur emphasizes that tokenized markets have programs that can automate or reduce the role and functions of intermediaries. He also notes that researchers who have recently studied tokenized markets found significant cost savings. The economist further argued that tokenization’s promise is visible in the numbers, but cautioned that efficiencies from new technologies often come with new risks.

Automated trading has already led to sudden market plunges, according to Agur. He added that tokenized markets can be more volatile, particularly due to their instantaneous execution of trades.

Tokenization offers flexible settlement options

The IMF has been examining the structure of digital assets and tokenized markets for years, and it acknowledges that tokenization is currently more mainstream than an experimental niche. Meanwhile, the fund believes that tokenization offers flexible settlement options.

Tokenization can spur competition between middlemen, making it easier for investors to shop around and switch between brokers for the best price. The fund also noted that tokenization does not cut out all middlemen, but it is transforming the financial industry and reducing the need for specific roles. The IMF pointed out that some specialized intermediaries also reduce market frictions in financial markets at various stages of the asset lifecycle. 

Meanwhile, the IFM observed that tokenization works best when assets and money flow smoothly. The fund also noted that it is easier to accumulate debt through tokenized markets because investors or institutions can use the tokens as collateral to borrow and invest elsewhere.  

However, Agur also argues that while the programmability of tokenized assets makes it easier to develop sophisticated financial products, regulators may not fully understand the inherent risks until it is too late. He pointed out that this was the situation back in the 2008-09 crisis, as the programmability of tokenized assets made it harder for regulators to track potential risks. 

Get $50 free to trade crypto when you sign up to Bybit now

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stabull’s Expansive Role in the DeFi Ecosystem

Stabull’s Expansive Role in the DeFi Ecosystem

The post Stabull’s Expansive Role in the DeFi Ecosystem appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A detailed examination of the Stabull protocol reveals its reach extends
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/24 07:28
Stablecoin yield in crypto Clarity Act won’t allow rewards on balances, latest text says

Stablecoin yield in crypto Clarity Act won’t allow rewards on balances, latest text says

The post Stablecoin yield in crypto Clarity Act won’t allow rewards on balances, latest text says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto industry insiders
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/24 06:58