The post Critical Liquidity Signals Bitcoin (BTC USD) Bottom Range at $80,000 – Arthur Hayes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights Arthur Hayes explains how major investment firms used Bitcoin (BTC USD) ETFs to profit and how they may have crashed the price. How raising the debt ceiling and treasury bill issuance have been negatively affecting liquidity in the market Why Hayes believes that $80,000 price level was the bottom and could usher in another rally in 2026. Crypto traders have been cautious about buying back into Bitcoin despite its recent recovery. This is because, for the last few months, the cryptocurrency has been lending itself to capitulation, and traders have now been conditioned to lean towards caution. Well, some analysts claim that this time, Bitcoin (BTC USD) may extend its relief recovery into a full-blown rally. Among those analysts was BitMex founder Arthur Hayes, who claims that already found a local bottom near $80,000. Hayes spoke during a Milk Road interview when he made the bold statement about Bitcoin’s bottom. However, he also revealed key details about the crash from August to November. According to Hayes, bullish expectations before the crash were mostly perpetuated by Bitcoin ETFs and digital asset treasury companies. The BitMex founder revealed that the largest Bitcoin ETF investors may have triggered the cascading liquidity flows. Arthur Hayes on Bitcoin’s local bottom/ source: X courtesy of Milk Road As per Hayes’ explanation of the market dynamics, Wall Street companies such as Goldman Sachs, Jane Street, Avenue, and a few others executed Bitcoin basis trades. However, the same institutions unwound their positions as funding rates cooled, thus selling their ETF positions. In Bitcoin’s case, Bitcoin treasury companies may have exited their positions and used the funds secured to buy back their stock at discounted prices. Hayes Explains Why Bitcoin & Other Risk Assets Crashed Despite Rate Cuts Most people expected that risk-on assets such as Bitcoin… The post Critical Liquidity Signals Bitcoin (BTC USD) Bottom Range at $80,000 – Arthur Hayes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights Arthur Hayes explains how major investment firms used Bitcoin (BTC USD) ETFs to profit and how they may have crashed the price. How raising the debt ceiling and treasury bill issuance have been negatively affecting liquidity in the market Why Hayes believes that $80,000 price level was the bottom and could usher in another rally in 2026. Crypto traders have been cautious about buying back into Bitcoin despite its recent recovery. This is because, for the last few months, the cryptocurrency has been lending itself to capitulation, and traders have now been conditioned to lean towards caution. Well, some analysts claim that this time, Bitcoin (BTC USD) may extend its relief recovery into a full-blown rally. Among those analysts was BitMex founder Arthur Hayes, who claims that already found a local bottom near $80,000. Hayes spoke during a Milk Road interview when he made the bold statement about Bitcoin’s bottom. However, he also revealed key details about the crash from August to November. According to Hayes, bullish expectations before the crash were mostly perpetuated by Bitcoin ETFs and digital asset treasury companies. The BitMex founder revealed that the largest Bitcoin ETF investors may have triggered the cascading liquidity flows. Arthur Hayes on Bitcoin’s local bottom/ source: X courtesy of Milk Road As per Hayes’ explanation of the market dynamics, Wall Street companies such as Goldman Sachs, Jane Street, Avenue, and a few others executed Bitcoin basis trades. However, the same institutions unwound their positions as funding rates cooled, thus selling their ETF positions. In Bitcoin’s case, Bitcoin treasury companies may have exited their positions and used the funds secured to buy back their stock at discounted prices. Hayes Explains Why Bitcoin & Other Risk Assets Crashed Despite Rate Cuts Most people expected that risk-on assets such as Bitcoin…

Critical Liquidity Signals Bitcoin (BTC USD) Bottom Range at $80,000 – Arthur Hayes

Key Insights

  • Arthur Hayes explains how major investment firms used Bitcoin (BTC USD) ETFs to profit and how they may have crashed the price.
  • How raising the debt ceiling and treasury bill issuance have been negatively affecting liquidity in the market
  • Why Hayes believes that $80,000 price level was the bottom and could usher in another rally in 2026.

Crypto traders have been cautious about buying back into Bitcoin despite its recent recovery.

This is because, for the last few months, the cryptocurrency has been lending itself to capitulation, and traders have now been conditioned to lean towards caution.

Well, some analysts claim that this time, Bitcoin (BTC USD) may extend its relief recovery into a full-blown rally.

Among those analysts was BitMex founder Arthur Hayes, who claims that already found a local bottom near $80,000.

Hayes spoke during a Milk Road interview when he made the bold statement about Bitcoin’s bottom. However, he also revealed key details about the crash from August to November.

According to Hayes, bullish expectations before the crash were mostly perpetuated by Bitcoin ETFs and digital asset treasury companies.

The BitMex founder revealed that the largest Bitcoin ETF investors may have triggered the cascading liquidity flows.

Arthur Hayes on Bitcoin’s local bottom/ source: X courtesy of Milk Road

As per Hayes’ explanation of the market dynamics, Wall Street companies such as Goldman Sachs, Jane Street, Avenue, and a few others executed Bitcoin basis trades.

However, the same institutions unwound their positions as funding rates cooled, thus selling their ETF positions.

In Bitcoin’s case, Bitcoin treasury companies may have exited their positions and used the funds secured to buy back their stock at discounted prices.

Hayes Explains Why Bitcoin & Other Risk Assets Crashed Despite Rate Cuts

Most people expected that risk-on assets such as Bitcoin (BTC USD), altcoins, and stocks would rally if the U.S Federal Reserve slashed rates.

However, the markets have been crashing despite there being 2 rate cuts this year in September and October.

Hayes noted that the U.S. Treasury needed to raise between $500 billion and $1 trillion after the U.S government raised the debt ceiling.

This also meant that the government had to raise funds from the market, which was done through a debt issuance process that sucked liquidity from the markets.

This negative liquidity in the market was also worsened by other factors, such as concerns about the AI bubble popping.

The BitMex founder mentioned that an accelerating lending pace would be among the major signs confirming a bullish bias for the markets.

Hayes believes that the U.S government will likely push banks to lend more, especially towards industrial activity.

This may boost economic output in some of the hottest industrial segments. In other words, the FED’s policies are still deeply rooted in crypto market outcomes.

How Far can Bitcoin (BTC USD) Go to the Upside by Year End?

While Hayes is optimistic that Bitcoin may have achieved its bottom near $80,000, a few questions remain.

Can Bitcoin achieve a faster recovery in December, and how far can it really go to the upside? Some top analysts predicted that Bitcoin could reach $120,000 by the end of 2025.

This would, however, require BTC to achieve a robust liquidity injection within the remaining 4 weeks to the end of 2025.

BTC’s recovery has so far been relatively slow and lacking excitement. The FED may switch this up as early as the first week of December 2025.

On the other hand, the prediction that the market has bottomed out may not offer a complete guarantee of a recovery without first breaking the $80,000 price level.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/11/29/critical-liquidity-signals-bitcoin-btc-usd-bottom-range-at-80000-arthur-hayes/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49
Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026?

The post Will Bitcoin Price Drop to $50,000 by March 2026? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is trading around $68,700, down nearly 22% year to date
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:59