The post Countries Where the Most Controversial, Biggest Dump-Eating Altcoins Were Launched Have Been Identified – Here’s the Much-Discussed List appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cryptocurrency research platform Bubblemaps has analyzed the location information of 38 altcoin projects, which have previously been in the news for their dense wallet clustering, transparency debates, and sharp price crashes, now visible on X (Twitter). The results clearly show where a significant portion of these controversial altcoins originated. According to the data, over 50% of the 38 projects examined appear to be located in the United States. Europe follows, followed by India and other regions. In addition to the geographic distribution, price performance is also striking: the lowest decline among tokens is -78%, while the majority of the remaining tokens have collapsed between -97% and -100%. For example, projects like MELANIA, CR7 Fake, FRIES, and ZEUS have lost almost all of their value. Here are the origins and price change information of the controversial altcoins: MTGA — USA — –100% RONNIE — USA — –100% FRENCH — USA — –100% DEGE — USA — –100% KING — USA — –100% MUVA — USA — –100% JASON — USA — –100% DAVIDO — USA — –100% JENNER — USA — –100% WOLF — USA — –99% GANG — USA — –99% FRIES — USA — –99% RYAN — USA — –99% DJT — USA — –90% ZEUS — USA — –97% HAWK — USA — –96% FM — US/Europe — –87% LIBRA — US — –86% BALL — USA — –82% LJEFFY — USA — –78% LILPUMP — Europe — –100% GINNAN — Europe — –99% PUNDLE — Europe — –99% 3AC — Europe — –99% MORI — Europe — –92% SFM — Europe — –87% GANG — India — –99% DON — India — –97% ZACK — Mexico — –100% FLOCKA — Canada — –100% USDM — Australia — –99% CR7 Fake — UAE — –99% YEPE — Thailand… The post Countries Where the Most Controversial, Biggest Dump-Eating Altcoins Were Launched Have Been Identified – Here’s the Much-Discussed List appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cryptocurrency research platform Bubblemaps has analyzed the location information of 38 altcoin projects, which have previously been in the news for their dense wallet clustering, transparency debates, and sharp price crashes, now visible on X (Twitter). The results clearly show where a significant portion of these controversial altcoins originated. According to the data, over 50% of the 38 projects examined appear to be located in the United States. Europe follows, followed by India and other regions. In addition to the geographic distribution, price performance is also striking: the lowest decline among tokens is -78%, while the majority of the remaining tokens have collapsed between -97% and -100%. For example, projects like MELANIA, CR7 Fake, FRIES, and ZEUS have lost almost all of their value. Here are the origins and price change information of the controversial altcoins: MTGA — USA — –100% RONNIE — USA — –100% FRENCH — USA — –100% DEGE — USA — –100% KING — USA — –100% MUVA — USA — –100% JASON — USA — –100% DAVIDO — USA — –100% JENNER — USA — –100% WOLF — USA — –99% GANG — USA — –99% FRIES — USA — –99% RYAN — USA — –99% DJT — USA — –90% ZEUS — USA — –97% HAWK — USA — –96% FM — US/Europe — –87% LIBRA — US — –86% BALL — USA — –82% LJEFFY — USA — –78% LILPUMP — Europe — –100% GINNAN — Europe — –99% PUNDLE — Europe — –99% 3AC — Europe — –99% MORI — Europe — –92% SFM — Europe — –87% GANG — India — –99% DON — India — –97% ZACK — Mexico — –100% FLOCKA — Canada — –100% USDM — Australia — –99% CR7 Fake — UAE — –99% YEPE — Thailand…

Countries Where the Most Controversial, Biggest Dump-Eating Altcoins Were Launched Have Been Identified – Here’s the Much-Discussed List

2025/11/29 23:19

Cryptocurrency research platform Bubblemaps has analyzed the location information of 38 altcoin projects, which have previously been in the news for their dense wallet clustering, transparency debates, and sharp price crashes, now visible on X (Twitter).

The results clearly show where a significant portion of these controversial altcoins originated.

According to the data, over 50% of the 38 projects examined appear to be located in the United States. Europe follows, followed by India and other regions. In addition to the geographic distribution, price performance is also striking: the lowest decline among tokens is -78%, while the majority of the remaining tokens have collapsed between -97% and -100%. For example, projects like MELANIA, CR7 Fake, FRIES, and ZEUS have lost almost all of their value.

Here are the origins and price change information of the controversial altcoins:

  • MTGA — USA — –100%
  • RONNIE — USA — –100%
  • FRENCH — USA — –100%
  • DEGE — USA — –100%
  • KING — USA — –100%
  • MUVA — USA — –100%
  • JASON — USA — –100%
  • DAVIDO — USA — –100%
  • JENNER — USA — –100%
  • WOLF — USA — –99%
  • GANG — USA — –99%
  • FRIES — USA — –99%
  • RYAN — USA — –99%
  • DJT — USA — –90%
  • ZEUS — USA — –97%
  • HAWK — USA — –96%
  • FM — US/Europe — –87%
  • LIBRA — US — –86%
  • BALL — USA — –82%
  • LJEFFY — USA — –78%
  • LILPUMP — Europe — –100%
  • GINNAN — Europe — –99%
  • PUNDLE — Europe — –99%
  • 3AC — Europe — –99%
  • MORI — Europe — –92%
  • SFM — Europe — –87%
  • GANG — India — –99%
  • DON — India — –97%
  • ZACK — Mexico — –100%
  • FLOCKA — Canada — –100%
  • USDM — Australia — –99%
  • CR7 Fake — UAE — –99%
  • YEPE — Thailand — –99%
  • KDT — Kenya — –99%
  • EGL1 — Malaysia — –83%

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/countries-where-the-most-controversial-biggest-dump-eating-altcoins-were-launched-have-been-identified-heres-the-much-discussed-list/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.