TLDRs; • Experts warn Tesla’s FSD rollout in Korea could encourage overreliance and increase accident risks on complex local roads. • Regulators face pressure to tighten oversight as Level 2 autonomy still requires full driver attention at all times. • Limited performance data on Korean roads fuels reliability concerns and may raise initial insurance premiums [...] The post Experts Sound Alarm as Tesla Introduces Full Self-Driving in Korea appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs; • Experts warn Tesla’s FSD rollout in Korea could encourage overreliance and increase accident risks on complex local roads. • Regulators face pressure to tighten oversight as Level 2 autonomy still requires full driver attention at all times. • Limited performance data on Korean roads fuels reliability concerns and may raise initial insurance premiums [...] The post Experts Sound Alarm as Tesla Introduces Full Self-Driving in Korea appeared first on CoinCentral.

Experts Sound Alarm as Tesla Introduces Full Self-Driving in Korea

TLDRs;

• Experts warn Tesla’s FSD rollout in Korea could encourage overreliance and increase accident risks on complex local roads.

• Regulators face pressure to tighten oversight as Level 2 autonomy still requires full driver attention at all times.
• Limited performance data on Korean roads fuels reliability concerns and may raise initial insurance premiums for FSD-equipped cars.
• Tesla targets Korea’s premium EV segment, but adoption may stay slow until FSD reaches higher-volume models.

Tesla’s introduction of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) system in South Korea has ignited a wave of concern among safety experts, consumer groups, and industry analysts.

Although the software has received approval as a Level 2 advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS), specialists warn that the rollout may lead to unintended consequences, including heightened driver overreliance and increased accident risks on Korea’s complex roadways.

The FSD feature, now available on imported Model S and Model X vehicles, arrives at a time when South Korea’s automotive ecosystem is already grappling with fast-evolving autonomous technologies. Yet despite the futuristic branding, Level 2 autonomy is far from hands-free.

Drivers must remain fully alert, ready to take control at any moment. This requirement, experts argue, is precisely why the system demands stricter government supervision and more localized road testing.

Regulators Urged to Step In

Specialists in traffic safety and intelligent transport systems say Korea’s existing regulatory framework is not yet robust enough to manage the behavioral shifts tied to Level 2 automation. They warn that drivers may incorrectly assume the technology allows for hands-off or mind-off driving, even though FSD is fundamentally a driver-assistance tool rather than a self-sufficient system.

Recent incidents involving autonomous features in other markets have amplified public unease. Some Korean drivers have already expressed skepticism, citing FSD’s limited operating history in Korea-specific conditions such as narrow city alleys, dense intersections, and unpredictable pedestrian patterns.

The call for heightened oversight includes demands for mandatory compliance data, performance disclosures, and expanded trials conducted directly on Korean roads before wider adoption.

Driver Reliance Sparks Warnings

A major point of concern centers on behavioral risk. Safety researchers emphasize that Level 2 systems can unintentionally foster a false sense of security. The more capable the automation appears, the more likely drivers may mentally disengage,slowing reaction times and increasing the likelihood of collisions when the system hands control back unexpectedly.

Korea’s road networks, characterized by highly variable lane markings, steep gradients, and bustling urban traffic, create unique challenges that FSD has had limited exposure to. Without extensive localized data, experts say predicting the system’s fail points remains difficult.

Insurance Sector Eyes New Risks

FSD’s debut introduces fresh questions for Korea’s insurance industry. With motor premiums already facing slight year-over-year declines, insurers are preparing to navigate new forms of liability tied to driver attentiveness, system faults, and unclear fault attribution.

Under Korea’s Product Liability Act, manufacturers can be held responsible for defective products, yet Level 2 autonomy still places the primary duty of care on the human driver. This blurred responsibility will likely accelerate demand for telematics solutions, tools that record driving behavior, engagement levels, and system-use patterns.

Because actuarial data for FSD performance in Korean conditions is extremely limited, analysts expect premiums for FSD-equipped vehicles to initially rise. This environment could benefit telematics startups, insurtech firms, and providers of ADAS-monitoring devices.

EV Market Shifts Shape Adoption

Tesla’s FSD launch strategically targets Korea’s premium EV segment, but market realities may temper early uptake. In September 2025, the company sold just over 9,000 vehicles, strong numbers, yet dominated by the more affordable Model Y, which does not currently include FSD.

The post Experts Sound Alarm as Tesla Introduces Full Self-Driving in Korea appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.