South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake. The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers […]South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake. The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers […]

South Korea is weighing a rule that limits won-stablecoin issuance to consortia where commercial banks hold at least a 51% stake

South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake.

The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers from the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DP), officials from the Financial Services Commission (FSC), and representatives of the banking industry on December 1, comes as part of the ongoing effort to enact a comprehensive Digital Asset Basic Act, which will regulate stablecoins and other digital assets and their issuance.

Banks lead, fintechs follow in the proposed consortium

Under the new framework, stablecoin issuers will take the form of a consortium, with banks holding at least 51% of the shares.

Speaking after the meeting, Kang Junhyun, the Democratic Party’s secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee, confirmed what was discussed in the meeting, stating, “The controversial issue of who will issue stablecoins has been resolved in a ‘consortium format’ by coordinating the positions of the Bank of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and the banking industry.”

South Korea’s regulatory and political deadline

Lawmakers went on to impose a deadline on the government, demanding that the government submit a draft bill containing the main framework by December 10. 

Kang stated that “if the government proposal is not submitted by this deadline, we will push forward with legislation initiated by lawmakers through the Political Affairs Committee.”

According to statements made by Kang, lawmakers are going to quickly share and propose the finalized bill and then go through a public debate process with the Digital Asset Task Force within the Democratic Party.

He stated, “Even if discussions are possible within this year, the actual passage of the bill will likely happen in January next year. I am not sure what the opposition (People Power Party) thinks, but the discussion process seems likely to take some time.”

Diverging views as consortium plan is not yet finalized

Last month, the country’s central bank, Bank of Korea (BOK), warned that non-bank stablecoin issuers could threaten monetary policy, deposit-protection frameworks, and financial stability. 

It argues that such entities would essentially be acting like narrow banks, where they issue currency and also offer payment services. It seems the consortium arrangement is an answer to the apex bank’s concerns. 

However, the stablecoin ecosystem, including some fintech advocates and industry stakeholders, says that limiting issuance to banks may hinder innovation and competition. 

They argue that strictly bank-dominated stablecoin issuance would reduce such coins to little more than digital bank deposits, impacting potential use cases, from cross-border payments to decentralized finance applications.

Moreover, even after the December 1 meeting, the FSC issued a statement noting that “no decision had been finalized” regarding the consortium plan, indicating that the regulatory framework is yet to get the consensus of all parties involved. Attention will now be on the government’s response to the ultimatum the lawmakers have given it.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38