The post Tech giants lose second attempt to preempt state AI laws appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tech giants face their second major setback this year after lawmakers refused to use the defense bill to stop states from making and enforcing their own AI rules. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise says the defense bill is not the right place to add language that would block state AI laws. Congress says no to stopping states from making their own AI rules The tech industry attempted to use the National Defense Authorization Act to prevent states from creating their own AI regulations, but Congress has blocked their efforts. Companies like Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Andreessen Horowitz sought to have Congress enact a rule that would establish a single national AI law, superseding stricter regulations in states like California and New York. The companies said one rule will make it easier to follow the law and avoid the confusion that comes from different state rules. Lawmakers on the House and Senate Armed Services Committees opposed the proposal, arguing that adding a narrow AI law to a large military bill was inappropriate. This is the second time Congress has blocked similar efforts to override state AI laws, as the Senate voted 99–1 against a measure that aimed to limit state power over AI earlier this year. Most lawmakers argue that states should retain the authority to regulate AI, prioritising the protection of people over concerns about costs and differing regulations.  However, both sides of Congress say the discussions aren’t over, and lawmakers could still make a federal rule that works alongside state laws, but only if it respects states’ power and protects the public.  White House and tech leaders try to change minds, but do not get the support they want White House AI chief David Sacks spent days working with top Republican leaders in Congress and executives from some of the biggest… The post Tech giants lose second attempt to preempt state AI laws appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tech giants face their second major setback this year after lawmakers refused to use the defense bill to stop states from making and enforcing their own AI rules. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise says the defense bill is not the right place to add language that would block state AI laws. Congress says no to stopping states from making their own AI rules The tech industry attempted to use the National Defense Authorization Act to prevent states from creating their own AI regulations, but Congress has blocked their efforts. Companies like Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Andreessen Horowitz sought to have Congress enact a rule that would establish a single national AI law, superseding stricter regulations in states like California and New York. The companies said one rule will make it easier to follow the law and avoid the confusion that comes from different state rules. Lawmakers on the House and Senate Armed Services Committees opposed the proposal, arguing that adding a narrow AI law to a large military bill was inappropriate. This is the second time Congress has blocked similar efforts to override state AI laws, as the Senate voted 99–1 against a measure that aimed to limit state power over AI earlier this year. Most lawmakers argue that states should retain the authority to regulate AI, prioritising the protection of people over concerns about costs and differing regulations.  However, both sides of Congress say the discussions aren’t over, and lawmakers could still make a federal rule that works alongside state laws, but only if it respects states’ power and protects the public.  White House and tech leaders try to change minds, but do not get the support they want White House AI chief David Sacks spent days working with top Republican leaders in Congress and executives from some of the biggest…

Tech giants lose second attempt to preempt state AI laws

Tech giants face their second major setback this year after lawmakers refused to use the defense bill to stop states from making and enforcing their own AI rules.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise says the defense bill is not the right place to add language that would block state AI laws.

Congress says no to stopping states from making their own AI rules

The tech industry attempted to use the National Defense Authorization Act to prevent states from creating their own AI regulations, but Congress has blocked their efforts. Companies like Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Andreessen Horowitz sought to have Congress enact a rule that would establish a single national AI law, superseding stricter regulations in states like California and New York. The companies said one rule will make it easier to follow the law and avoid the confusion that comes from different state rules.

Lawmakers on the House and Senate Armed Services Committees opposed the proposal, arguing that adding a narrow AI law to a large military bill was inappropriate.

This is the second time Congress has blocked similar efforts to override state AI laws, as the Senate voted 99–1 against a measure that aimed to limit state power over AI earlier this year. Most lawmakers argue that states should retain the authority to regulate AI, prioritising the protection of people over concerns about costs and differing regulations. 

However, both sides of Congress say the discussions aren’t over, and lawmakers could still make a federal rule that works alongside state laws, but only if it respects states’ power and protects the public. 

White House and tech leaders try to change minds, but do not get the support they want

White House AI chief David Sacks spent days working with top Republican leaders in Congress and executives from some of the biggest AI companies in the United States. He and his team said a single national rule for AI will make it easier for companies to follow the law, boost innovations, and prevent countries like China from getting ahead of the U.S.

However, lawmakers disagreed, arguing that states must retain the power to hold companies accountable if AI products cause harm. Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated that the White House attempted to find a middle ground. Still, Congress was unwilling to grant tech companies a broad exemption or weaken state authority in any way.

President Donald Trump publicly asked Congress to block state-level AI rules, stating that using preemption language in the defense bill would protect U.S. companies and help them compete globally. However, even with the commander-in-chief and big tech companies working hand in hand to push the bill, Congress remained unswayed. Many lawmakers on the Armed Services Committee said the pleading parties rushed the decision and that it isn’t right for a bill focused on national defense. They warned that adding an AI law, which most AI companies are pushing for, to the defense bill would threaten the safety of citizens, workers, and communities. 

Tech companies are expected to continue pushing next year, as they believe the political situation will shift in their favor. States can still create and enforce their own AI rules that companies must follow. This goes to show just how strong a decision from Congress can be even when the White House, big tech, and whole presidents stand against it. 

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/tech-lose-attempt-to-preempt-state-ai-laws/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38