BitcoinWorld
Essential Innovation: Why South Korea Must Design, Not Ban, a Won-Denominated Stablecoin
Imagine a digital version of the Korean Won you can use globally in seconds. This is the promise of a won-denominated stablecoin, a topic sparking intense debate in Seoul. Instead of fearing this innovation, a key lawmaker argues South Korea should lead by designing it right. Let’s explore why a smart framework, not a ban, could be the nation’s best path forward.
Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byeong-deok recently made a compelling case. At a seminar hosted by the party’s Digital Asset Task Force, he challenged the cautious stance of the Bank of Korea. His core argument? The absence of a domestic, regulated stablecoin is a bigger risk than creating one.
Without a homegrown option, South Korean users and businesses might turn to unregulated foreign stablecoins. This could expose the economy to external volatility and reduce the central bank’s monetary policy influence. Therefore, a properly designed won-denominated stablecoin isn’t just an asset; it’s a tool for financial sovereignty.
Lawmaker Min directly criticized a recent Bank of Korea report that highlighted stablecoin risks like runs and settlement failures. While these concerns are valid, his perspective adds crucial context. A ban doesn’t eliminate risk; it merely shifts it offshore and into the shadows.
Consider the potential consequences of prohibition:
The call is clear: proactive design beats reactive restriction.
The key lies in “proper design.” This means building a regulatory framework before the product, ensuring stability and trust from day one. A successful won-denominated stablecoin would likely need:
This approach transforms the stablecoin from a speculative asset into a reliable digital payment rail.
While the vision is clear, the legislative path remains under discussion. Kim Sung-jin, head of the Financial Services Commission’s Virtual Asset Division, provided an update. Authorities are “expediting” the bill for the second phase of the Digital Asset Act, which is expected to cover stablecoins.
However, he declined to give a specific schedule. This indicates careful, albeit urgent, deliberation to get the rules right. The focus is on creating a lasting framework, not a rushed one.
The debate over a won-denominated stablecoin is about more than cryptocurrency. It’s about South Korea’s future in the digital economy. Lawmaker Min’s stance highlights a strategic truth: in the race for financial innovation, you either design the future or get designed by it. By embracing responsible innovation, South Korea can protect its economy, empower its citizens, and secure its position as a global digital leader. The opportunity is here; it’s time to build.
Q: What is a won-denominated stablecoin?
A: It’s a type of cryptocurrency designed to have a stable value, pegged 1:1 to the South Korean Won (KRW). It combines the benefits of digital currency—like fast, borderless transfers—with the price stability of traditional money.
Q: Why does Lawmaker Min oppose a ban?
A: He believes a ban would be counterproductive. It would push demand toward unregulated foreign stablecoins, creating greater systemic risk and reducing South Korea’s control over its own financial ecosystem.
Q: What are the main risks of stablecoins?
A: Key risks include a “run” on the stablecoin if users lose faith in its backing, the failure of the issuing entity, and potential disruptions to traditional financial systems if not properly integrated.
Q: How would a designed stablecoin differ from existing ones like USDT?
A: A state-sanctioned, Korean won-denominated stablecoin would operate under strict local regulations, require full transparency and auditing, and be integrated with national financial infrastructure, offering greater security and legal recourse for users.
Q: When will South Korea’s stablecoin laws be ready?
A: There is no official date. The Financial Services Commission has confirmed it is working to expedite the relevant legislation (the second phase of the Digital Asset Act), but the process is complex and ongoing.
Q: Who would issue a won-denominated stablecoin?
A: This is a key part of the design debate. Potential issuers could include licensed financial institutions, fintech companies, or a public-private partnership, all under the supervision of Korean regulators.
Did you find this breakdown of South Korea’s stablecoin debate insightful? The conversation about national digital currencies is shaping the future of global finance. Help others stay informed by sharing this article on your social media channels. Let’s spread knowledge about this critical financial innovation!
To learn more about the latest trends in digital asset regulation, explore our article on key developments shaping global cryptocurrency adoption and policy frameworks.
This post Essential Innovation: Why South Korea Must Design, Not Ban, a Won-Denominated Stablecoin first appeared on BitcoinWorld.


