The article concludes that OTFS significantly outperforms OFDM by reducing channel training overhead, leveraging a more accurate delay–Doppler channel model, enabling efficient interpolation, and improving prediction in doubly-dispersive environments.The article concludes that OTFS significantly outperforms OFDM by reducing channel training overhead, leveraging a more accurate delay–Doppler channel model, enabling efficient interpolation, and improving prediction in doubly-dispersive environments.

Study Highlights Why OTFS Outperforms OFDM in Doubly-Dispersive Channels

  • I. Abstract and Introduction
  • II. Related Work
  • III. Modeling of Mobile Channels
  • IV. Channel Discretization
  • V. Channel Interpolation and Extrapolation
  • VI. Numerical Evaluations
  • VII. Conclusions, Appendix, and References

VII. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we talked about the advantages of OTFS over OFDM in terms of spectral efficiency, resulting from the much reduced channel training overhead. We showed that the D-D domain channel model is also an approximation of the real channel, but it is more accurate then the LTI model, and thus allows us to estimate the channel with a much reduced channel estimation frequency. The predictability of the channel in T-F domain comes from the sparsity of response in D-D domain. Besides, we showed that it’s possible to use a very small amount of resources for channel interpolation. A pipeline algorithm is proposed for channel interpolation with reduced processing delay. Further more, we showed that channel extrapolation and data-aided channel tracking would be possible, benefiting from the predictability of the D-D domain channel. Two sources of channel interpolation error are unveiled: the D-D domain aliasing resulting from the finite TF window, and the ISCI induced by channel dispersion. Their impacts on channel estimation error are quantified. Overall, we can conclude that OTFS has a huge advantage over OFDM due to the reduced channel training overhead. As a matter of fact, this advantage actually comes from the D-D domain channel model itself, and is thus shared by other signaling techniques designed for doubly-dispersive channels.

APPENDIX A SUM OF sinc AND DIRICHLET FUNCTIONS

REFERENCES

[1] S. B. Weinstein, “The history of orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing [history of communications],” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, pp. 26–35, Nov. 2009.

\ [2] R. W. Chang, “Synthesis of band-limited orthogonal signals for multichannel data transmission,” The Bell Sys. Tech. J., vol. 45, pp. 1775– 1796, Dec. 1966.

\ [3] L. Cimini, “Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 33, pp. 665–675, July 1985.

\ [4] D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

\ [5] T. L. Marzetta, “Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, pp. 3590–3600, Nov. 2010.

\ [6] Y. Song, Z. Gong, C. Li, and Y. Chen, “Efficient channel estimation for wideband millimeter wave massive MIMO systems with beam squint,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, pp. 3421–3435, May 2022.

\ [7] Z. Gong, C. Li, and F. Jiang, “Pilot decontamination in noncooperative massive MIMO cellular networks based on spatial filtering,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, pp. 1419–1433, Feb. 2019.

\ [8] E. Dahlman, S. Parkvall, and J. Skold, 5G NR: The next generation wireless access technology. Academic Press, 2020.

\ [9] T. Dean, M. Chowdhury, and A. Goldsmith, “A new modulation technique for Doppler compensation in frequency-dispersive channels,” in 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1–7, 2017.

\ [10] T. R. Dean, M. Chowdhury, N. Grimwood, and A. J. Goldsmith, “Rethinking modulation and detection for high Doppler channels,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 19, pp. 3629–3642, June 2020.

\ [11] T. Wang, J. Proakis, E. Masry, and J. Zeidler, “Performance degradation of OFDM systems due to Doppler spreading,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 5, pp. 1422–1432, June 2006.

\ [12] A. Monk, R. Hadani, M. Tsatsanis, and S. Rakib, “OTFS-orthogonal time frequency space,” 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02993, Aug. 2016.

\ [13] R. Hadani, S. Rakib, M. Tsatsanis, A. Monk, A. J. Goldsmith, A. F. Molisch, and R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” in 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6, 2017.

\ [14] R. Hadani and A. Monk, “OTFS: A new generation of modulation addressing the challenges of 5G.” Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802. 02623, 2018. arXiv:1802.02623 [cs.IT].

\ [15] A. Bemani, N. Ksairi, and M. Kountouris, “Affine frequency division multiplexing for next generation wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, pp. 8214–8229, Nov. 2023.

\ [16] X. Ouyang and J. Zhao, “Orthogonal chirp division multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, pp. 3946–3957, Sept. 2016.

\ [17] M. S. Omar and X. Ma, “Performance analysis of OCDM for wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, pp. 4032– 4043, July 2021.

\ [18] H. Lin and J. Yuan, “Orthogonal delay-doppler division multiplexing modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 11024–11037, Dec. 2022.

\ [19] M. K. Ramachandran, G. D. Surabhi, and A. Chockalingam, “OTFS: A new modulation scheme for high-mobility use cases,” Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, vol. 100, pp. 315 – 336, April 2020.

\ [20] H. B. Mishra, P. Singh, A. K. Prasad, and R. Budhiraja, “OTFS channel estimation and data detection designs with superimposed pilots,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 2258–2274, Sept. 2022.

\ [21] P. Raviteja, K. T. Phan, and Y. Hong, “Embedded pilot-aided channel estimation for OTFS in delay-Doppler channels,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 68, pp. 4906–4917, May 2019.

\ [22] R. Hadani, S. Rakib, A. F. Molisch, C. Ibars, A. Monk, M. Tsatsanis, J. Delfeld, A. Goldsmith, and R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation for millimeter-wave communications systems,” in 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), pp. 681–683, 2017.

\ [23] R. Hadani, S. Rakib, S. Kons, M. Tsatsanis, A. Monk, C. Ibars, J. Delfeld, Y. Hebron, A. J. Goldsmith, A. F. Molisch, and A. R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space modulation,” CoRR, vol. abs/1808.00519, 2018.

\ [24] X.-G. Xia, “Comments on “the transmitted signals of OTFS and VOFDM are the same”,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 11252–11252, Dec. 2022.

\ [25] X.-G. Xia, “Precoded and vector OFDM robust to channel spectral nulls and with reduced cyclic prefix length in single transmit antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 49, pp. 1363–1374, Aug. 2001.

\ [26] P. Raviteja, E. Viterbo, and Y. Hong, “OTFS performance on static multipath channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 745–748, June 2019.

\ [27] A. Sayeed and B. Aazhang, “Joint multipath-Doppler diversity in mobile wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 47, pp. 123–132, Jan. 1999.

\ [28] X. Ma and G. Giannakis, “Maximum-diversity transmissions over doubly selective wireless channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 49, pp. 1832–1840, July 2003.

\ [29] Y. Ma, G. Ma, B. Ai, D. Fei, N. Wang, Z. Zhong, and J. Yuan, “Characteristics of channel spreading function and performance of OTFS in high-speed railway,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 22, pp. 7038–7054, Oct. 2023.

\ [30] G. D. Surabhi, R. M. Augustine, and A. Chockalingam, “On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 18, pp. 3049–3063, June 2019.

\ [31] R. M. Augustine, G. D. Surabhi, and A. Chockalingam, “Space-time coded OTFS modulation in high-Doppler channels,” in 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Spring), pp. 1–6, 2019.

\ [32] S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam, and R. Calderbank, “OTFS-a mathematical foundation for communication and radar sensing in the delay-Doppler domain,” IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine, vol. 2, pp. 36–55, Nov. 2022.

\ [33] S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam, and R. Calderbank, “OTFS-predictability in the delay-Doppler domain and its value to communication and radar sensing.” arXiv:2302.08705 [eess.SP], Feb. 2023.

\ [34] W. Shen, L. Dai, J. An, P. Fan, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation for orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) massive MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, pp. 4204–4217, Aug. 2019.

\ [35] W. Shen, L. Dai, S. Han, I. Chih-Lin, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation for orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) massive MIMO,” in ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), (Shanghai, China), pp. 1–6, 2019.

\ [36] D. Shi, W. Wang, L. You, X. Song, Y. Hong, X. Gao, and G. Fettweis, “Deterministic pilot design and channel estimation for downlink massive MIMO-OTFS systems in presence of the fractional Doppler,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 20, pp. 7151–7165, Nov. 2021.

\ [37] Y. Liu, S. Zhang, F. Gao, J. Ma, and X. Wang, “Uplink-aided high mobility downlink channel estimation over massive MIMO-OTFS system,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, pp. 1994–2009, Sept. 2020.

\ [38] M. Kollengode Ramachandran and A. Chockalingam, “MIMO-OTFS in high-Doppler fading channels: Signal detection and channel estimation,” in 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 206–212, 2018.

\ [39] L. Gaudio, G. Caire, and G. Colavolpe, “On achievable rate of OFDM and OTFS in the presence of sparsity,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), (Montreal, QC, Canada), pp. 1–6, June 2021.

\ [40] L. Gaudio, G. Colavolpe, and G. Caire, “OTFS vs. OFDM in the presence of sparsity: A fair comparison,” IEEE Trans. on Wireless Commun., vol. 21, pp. 4410–4423, June 2022.

\ [41] S. K. Mohammed, “Derivation of OTFS modulation from first principles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, pp. 7619–7636, Aug. 2021.

\ [42] S. K. Mohammed, “Time-domain to delay-Doppler domain conversion of OTFS signals in very high mobility scenarios,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, pp. 6178–6183, June 2021.

\ [43] P. Bello, “Characterization of randomly time-variant linear channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun. Sys., vol. 11, pp. 360–393, Dec. 1963.

\ [44] Z. Gong, F. Jiang, C. Li, and X. Shen, “Simultaneous localization and communications with massive MIMO-OTFS,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, pp. 3908–3924, Dec. 2023.

\ [45] K. Liu, T. Kadous, and A. Sayeed, “Orthogonal time-frequency signaling over doubly dispersive channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, pp. 2583–2603, Nov. 2004.

\ [46] K. Grochenig, “Foundations of time-frequency analysis,” in ¨ Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, 2000. [47] Z. Gong, “Fast signal interpolation through zero-padding and FFT/IFFT.” arXiv:2407.06502 [eess.SP], 2024.

\

:::info Authors:

(1) Zijun Gong, Member, IEEE;

(2) Fan Jiang, Member, IEEE;

(3) Yuhui Song, Student Member, IEEE;

(4) Cheng Li, Senior Member, IEEE;

(5) Xiaofeng Tao, Senior Member, IEEE.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

:::

\

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001619
$0.00000001619$0.00000001619
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FTX Trust Sues Genesis Digital for $1.15B Clawback Over Alleged Fraudulent Transfers

FTX Trust Sues Genesis Digital for $1.15B Clawback Over Alleged Fraudulent Transfers

The FTX Recovery Trust has filed a $1.15 billion lawsuit against the Bitcoin mining firm Genesis Digital Assets, alleging fraudulent transfers. The complaint, filed on Monday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, alleges that Sam Bankman-Fried used misappropriated FTX customer funds to purchase Genesis Digital shares at “outrageously inflated prices” through his hedge fund, Alameda Research, between August 2021 and April 2022. Genesis Digital co-founders Rashit Makhat and Marco Krohn received $470 million and $80.9 million, respectively, for their shares in February 2022, according to court documents. The trust contends that only Alameda, and by extension Bankman-Fried, as its 90% owner, benefited from the investments, while FTX customers and creditors suffered losses from the diverted exchange funds.Court Document (Source: Bloomberg Law) Genesis Investment Timeline Reveals Systematic Fund Diversion Court documents reveal that discussions between Bankman-Fried and Genesis Digital began in July 2021, when the Kazakhstan-based mining company was seeking capital to expand its operations into the United States. Bankman-Fried joined Genesis Digital’s board in October 2021, according to Bloomberg, positioning himself to oversee what would become one of Alameda’s largest venture investments. The complaint describes how the FTX founder caused Alameda to purchase multiple tranches of Genesis shares over an eight-month period, with the lawsuit characterizing Genesis as “one of Bankman-Fried’s most reckless investments with commingled and misappropriated funds.“ Between August 2021 and April 2022, Alameda invested $1.15 billion across four distinct funding rounds: $100 million in August 2021, $550 million in January 2022, $250 million in February, and $250 million in April 2022. The trust alleges that FTX insiders regularly caused Alameda to “borrow” billions from the FTX.com exchange to fund “profligate lifestyles and vanity investments” while hiding the source of these funds from investors and creditors. Bankman-Fried resigned from Genesis Digital’s board one day before FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022, according to the court filing. Mining Sector Faces Renewed Scrutiny Amid FTX Fallout The Genesis Digital lawsuit is the latest effort by FTX’s bankruptcy estate to recover assets for creditors, with the trust having already distributed $6.2 billion across two previous rounds of payments. The trust completed a $1.2 billion distribution in February, followed by a larger $5 billion payout in May, with an additional $1.6 billion distribution scheduled for September 30, bringing total recoveries to nearly half of the $16.5 billion earmarked for victims. These recovery efforts come as Genesis Digital, which operates over 500 megawatts of mining capacity across 20 data centers on four continents, saw its valuation reach $5.5 billion during an April 2022 fundraising round shortly before cryptocurrency prices collapsed later that year. The mining company was exploring an initial public offering in the United States as recently as July 2024, working with advisors to evaluate a potential listing and planning a pre-IPO funding round amid the crypto industry’s recovery from the 2022 market downturn. However, the FTX lawsuit adds another layer of complexity to Genesis Digital’s corporate structure, which includes an extensive network of U.S. subsidiaries with names like Dog House TX-1, Mother Whale LLC, and White Deer LLC. The complaint alleges that these U.S. subsidiaries operate as “alter egos” of the parent company, potentially exposing the entire corporate structure to clawback claims under both federal bankruptcy law and Delaware state fraudulent transfer statutes. Meanwhile, Bankman-Fried continues to serve his 25-year prison sentence following his conviction on seven felony charges, with oral arguments for his appeal scheduled for November 4, 2025. The lawsuit adds to the complex web of litigation following the $175 million settlement earlier this year with Genesis Global, a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, as creditors and bankruptcy trustees pursue recovery efforts across multiple jurisdictions and corporate entities tied to the failed exchange
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/24 03:14
Ripple-Backed Evernorth Faces $220M Loss on XRP Holdings Amid Market Slump

Ripple-Backed Evernorth Faces $220M Loss on XRP Holdings Amid Market Slump

TLDR Evernorth invested $947M in XRP, now valued at $724M, a loss of over $220M. XRP’s price dropped 16% in the last 30 days, leading to Evernorth’s paper losses
Share
Coincentral2025/12/26 03:56
New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together

New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together

The post New Trump appointee Miran calls for half-point cut in only dissent as rest of Fed bands together appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stephen Miran, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and US Federal Reserve governor nominee for US President Donald Trump, arrives for a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, Sept. 4, 2025. The Senate Banking Committee’s examination of Stephen Miran’s appointment will provide the first extended look at how prominent Republican senators balance their long-standing support of an independent central bank against loyalty to their party leader. Photographer: Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images Daniel Heuer | Bloomberg | Getty Images Newly-confirmed Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran dissented from the central bank’s decision to lower the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point on Wednesday, choosing instead to call for a half-point cut. Miran, who was confirmed by the Senate to the Fed Board of Governors on Monday, was the sole dissenter in the Federal Open Market Committee’s statement. Governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, who had dissented at the Fed’s prior meeting in favor of a quarter-point move, were aligned with Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the others besides Miran this time. Miran was selected by Trump back in August to fill the seat that was vacated by former Governor Adriana Kugler after she suddenly announced her resignation without stating a reason for doing so. He has said that he will take an unpaid leave of absence as chair of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors rather than fully resign from the position. Miran’s place on the board, which will last until Jan. 31, 2026 when Kugler’s term was due to end, has been viewed by critics as a threat from Trump to the Fed’s independence, as the president has nominated three of the seven members. Trump also said in August that he had fired Federal Reserve Board Governor…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:26