In a unanimous decision, Supreme Court justices rule that PhilHealth funds remitted to the national treasury in 2024 must be returned to the state insurerIn a unanimous decision, Supreme Court justices rule that PhilHealth funds remitted to the national treasury in 2024 must be returned to the state insurer

Supreme Court orders return of P60B to PhilHealth, bars further fund transfer

2025/12/05 14:35

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court (SC) unanimously ordered the return of P60 billion to the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth), ruling that the fund transfer from the state insurer to the national treasury in 2024 was unconstitutional.

The SC, in a ruling penned by Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier, also “permanently prohibited the transfer of the remaining P29.9-billion fund balance,” the High Court announced on Friday, December 5.

Several groups and public health advocates had filed petitions with the SC, seeking to block the order of the Department of Finance (DOF) to transfer P89.9 billion in “excess” PhilHealth funds to the national treasury.

Then-finance secretary Ralph Recto sought to justify the transfer, saying that the DOF’s directive to the state insurer was within the bounds of the law.

Recto said Republic Act No. 11975 or the General Appropriations Act of 2024 introduced a new “special provision” that allows the government to collect excess funds from government-owned and -controlled corporations like PhilHealth.

But petitioners opposing the fund transfer argued that it violates Section 11 of Republic Act No. 11223 or the Universal Health Care Act, which states that PhilHealth’s reserve funds or income cannot be used as a general fund of the national government.

In total, PhilHealth was only able to remit P60 billion out of the P89.9 billion after a temporary restraining order, issued by the SC in October 2024, prevented it from remitting the last tranche.

Ahead of the SC decision, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in September ordered the return of the P60 billion to the state insurer. – Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.