The post Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards. Summary Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​ Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​ Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns. Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​ $PIGGY RUG Over the last 10 minutes, nearly $4M worth of $PIGGY was freshly minted – and immediately dumped on the market The token collapsed -90% instantly Minting wallet:0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 pic.twitter.com/5SI2NmezQO — onchainschool.pro (@how2onchain) December 5, 2025 What happened to PIGGY According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​ At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​ Who is Piggycell Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play… The post Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards. Summary Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​ Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​ Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns. Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​ $PIGGY RUG Over the last 10 minutes, nearly $4M worth of $PIGGY was freshly minted – and immediately dumped on the market The token collapsed -90% instantly Minting wallet:0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 pic.twitter.com/5SI2NmezQO — onchainschool.pro (@how2onchain) December 5, 2025 What happened to PIGGY According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​ At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​ Who is Piggycell Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play…

Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash

Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards.

Summary

  • Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​
  • Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​
  • Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns.

Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​

What happened to PIGGY

According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​

At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​

Who is Piggycell

Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play under the PIGGY ticker. The project’s pitch is simple: users rent portable power banks from a physical network of stations, while token holders earn incentives tied to real-world device usage and uptime.​

PIGGY launched through Binance Alpha in late October, with a 100 million token supply split across BNB Chain and ICP, and an airdrop campaign designed to funnel early users via Alpha Points. Binance promoted Piggycell as a “top power bank network turned RWA & DePIN protocol,” underlining the platform’s desire to court physical‑infrastructure narratives.​

Rug pull, exploit, or mismanaged tokenomics?

The pattern desccribed by traders—sudden mint, aggressive dumping, vertical price collapse—is textbook rug‑pull or insider exit behavior, even if intent is not yet proven. Rug pulls typically rely either on hidden mint functions or concentrated insider holdings that can be offloaded onto retail without warning, leaving the market illiquid and shell‑shocked.

Source: https://crypto.news/binance-alphas-piggycell-faces-scrutiny-after-brutal-crash/

Market Opportunity
Stella Logo
Stella Price(ALPHA)
$0.006281
$0.006281$0.006281
+3.81%
USD
Stella (ALPHA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trade War Headlines Trigger $800M In Liquidations Overnight: Longs Get Wiped Out Across Crypto Markets

Trade War Headlines Trigger $800M In Liquidations Overnight: Longs Get Wiped Out Across Crypto Markets

The crypto market faced a sharp selloff overnight as renewed trade conflict fears between the United States and the European Union shook global risk sentiment.
Share
NewsBTC2026/01/20 11:00
Rokid Ai Glasses Style Now Available Globally

Rokid Ai Glasses Style Now Available Globally

The world’s first open ecosystem AI smart glasses—ultra-light, prescription-first, and built for ChatGPT, Qwen, DeepSeek, and more—are now shipping worldwide, starting
Share
AI Journal2026/01/20 11:45
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40