Ripple CTO critiques Bitcoin replication; blockchain offers unique verification advantage. Bitcoin’s fixed supply highlights its value amid ongoing gold debate. Zhao challenges Schiff, emphasizing Bitcoin’s instant verification over gold’s struggles. The ongoing debate around Bitcoin’s value and legitimacy continues to generate significant attention across the crypto community. Ripple’s (CTO), David Schwartz, recently joined the conversation following an intriguing discussion at the Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai. The debate reached a new level of intensity when Binance founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao engaged in a public showdown with Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff, sparking a conversation about Bitcoin versus gold. During the event, Zhao seized an opportunity to challenge Schiff’s criticism of Bitcoin by presenting a gold bar and asking Schiff to verify its authenticity. However, Schiff hesitated, stating he would need specialized tools to confirm the gold’s legitimacy. Also Read: Dogecoin Futures Open Interest Declines as Market Faces Downtrend Zhao, in turn, highlighted the instantaneous verification process that Bitcoin transactions undergo, contrasting this with the difficulties associated with verifying gold in real-time. This exchange led to a wider conversation within the crypto community about the viability of replicating Bitcoin. In response to an online query asking how long it would take to recreate Bitcoin, Schwartz offered his perspective. He pointed out the flaw in the question, questioning how something could both be “new” and “exactly the same.” Schwartz also pondered the implications of replicating Bitcoin, explaining that the true value of Bitcoin is not just in its physical form but also in its fixed supply and blockchain verification. Bitcoin’s Fixed Supply and Unique Value Proposition Schwartz’s input directly addressed a common misconception in the crypto space—that Bitcoin could simply be replicated, much like any other digital asset. As Schwartz explained, the fixed supply of Bitcoin means there will only ever be 21 million coins in circulation. Currently, about 19.96 million Bitcoin are in circulation, with just over one million left to be mined. This scarcity is a key factor in Bitcoin’s value proposition, ensuring its status as a unique digital asset. The phrase “1 BTC = 1 BTC” remains a crucial reminder in the crypto world that the value of Bitcoin is tied to its fixed nature and scarcity, rather than fluctuations in fiat currencies. Unlike gold, which still faces challenges in verification, Bitcoin transactions are verified instantly on the blockchain. The process of creating replicas of Bitcoin does not affect its value because its supply is capped, and the authenticity is assured by the blockchain technology that underpins it. The debate between gold and Bitcoin has sparked fresh insights into the evolving nature of digital assets. As technology progresses, Bitcoin continues to stand out for its robust verification process and the inherent limitations of its supply. Also Read: XRP Is Heading Toward a Critical Level, Here’s What’s Happening and What Comes Next The post Ripple CTO Weighs In on the Bitcoin Debate: Can Bitcoin Be Replicated? appeared first on 36Crypto. Ripple CTO critiques Bitcoin replication; blockchain offers unique verification advantage. Bitcoin’s fixed supply highlights its value amid ongoing gold debate. Zhao challenges Schiff, emphasizing Bitcoin’s instant verification over gold’s struggles. The ongoing debate around Bitcoin’s value and legitimacy continues to generate significant attention across the crypto community. Ripple’s (CTO), David Schwartz, recently joined the conversation following an intriguing discussion at the Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai. The debate reached a new level of intensity when Binance founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao engaged in a public showdown with Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff, sparking a conversation about Bitcoin versus gold. During the event, Zhao seized an opportunity to challenge Schiff’s criticism of Bitcoin by presenting a gold bar and asking Schiff to verify its authenticity. However, Schiff hesitated, stating he would need specialized tools to confirm the gold’s legitimacy. Also Read: Dogecoin Futures Open Interest Declines as Market Faces Downtrend Zhao, in turn, highlighted the instantaneous verification process that Bitcoin transactions undergo, contrasting this with the difficulties associated with verifying gold in real-time. This exchange led to a wider conversation within the crypto community about the viability of replicating Bitcoin. In response to an online query asking how long it would take to recreate Bitcoin, Schwartz offered his perspective. He pointed out the flaw in the question, questioning how something could both be “new” and “exactly the same.” Schwartz also pondered the implications of replicating Bitcoin, explaining that the true value of Bitcoin is not just in its physical form but also in its fixed supply and blockchain verification. Bitcoin’s Fixed Supply and Unique Value Proposition Schwartz’s input directly addressed a common misconception in the crypto space—that Bitcoin could simply be replicated, much like any other digital asset. As Schwartz explained, the fixed supply of Bitcoin means there will only ever be 21 million coins in circulation. Currently, about 19.96 million Bitcoin are in circulation, with just over one million left to be mined. This scarcity is a key factor in Bitcoin’s value proposition, ensuring its status as a unique digital asset. The phrase “1 BTC = 1 BTC” remains a crucial reminder in the crypto world that the value of Bitcoin is tied to its fixed nature and scarcity, rather than fluctuations in fiat currencies. Unlike gold, which still faces challenges in verification, Bitcoin transactions are verified instantly on the blockchain. The process of creating replicas of Bitcoin does not affect its value because its supply is capped, and the authenticity is assured by the blockchain technology that underpins it. The debate between gold and Bitcoin has sparked fresh insights into the evolving nature of digital assets. As technology progresses, Bitcoin continues to stand out for its robust verification process and the inherent limitations of its supply. Also Read: XRP Is Heading Toward a Critical Level, Here’s What’s Happening and What Comes Next The post Ripple CTO Weighs In on the Bitcoin Debate: Can Bitcoin Be Replicated? appeared first on 36Crypto.

Ripple CTO Weighs In on the Bitcoin Debate: Can Bitcoin Be Replicated?

2025/12/07 01:31
  • Ripple CTO critiques Bitcoin replication; blockchain offers unique verification advantage.
  • Bitcoin’s fixed supply highlights its value amid ongoing gold debate.
  • Zhao challenges Schiff, emphasizing Bitcoin’s instant verification over gold’s struggles.

The ongoing debate around Bitcoin’s value and legitimacy continues to generate significant attention across the crypto community. Ripple’s (CTO), David Schwartz, recently joined the conversation following an intriguing discussion at the Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai.


The debate reached a new level of intensity when Binance founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao engaged in a public showdown with Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff, sparking a conversation about Bitcoin versus gold.


During the event, Zhao seized an opportunity to challenge Schiff’s criticism of Bitcoin by presenting a gold bar and asking Schiff to verify its authenticity. However, Schiff hesitated, stating he would need specialized tools to confirm the gold’s legitimacy.


Also Read: Dogecoin Futures Open Interest Declines as Market Faces Downtrend


Zhao, in turn, highlighted the instantaneous verification process that Bitcoin transactions undergo, contrasting this with the difficulties associated with verifying gold in real-time.


This exchange led to a wider conversation within the crypto community about the viability of replicating Bitcoin. In response to an online query asking how long it would take to recreate Bitcoin, Schwartz offered his perspective. He pointed out the flaw in the question, questioning how something could both be “new” and “exactly the same.”


Schwartz also pondered the implications of replicating Bitcoin, explaining that the true value of Bitcoin is not just in its physical form but also in its fixed supply and blockchain verification.


Bitcoin’s Fixed Supply and Unique Value Proposition

Schwartz’s input directly addressed a common misconception in the crypto space—that Bitcoin could simply be replicated, much like any other digital asset. As Schwartz explained, the fixed supply of Bitcoin means there will only ever be 21 million coins in circulation.


Currently, about 19.96 million Bitcoin are in circulation, with just over one million left to be mined. This scarcity is a key factor in Bitcoin’s value proposition, ensuring its status as a unique digital asset.


The phrase “1 BTC = 1 BTC” remains a crucial reminder in the crypto world that the value of Bitcoin is tied to its fixed nature and scarcity, rather than fluctuations in fiat currencies. Unlike gold, which still faces challenges in verification, Bitcoin transactions are verified instantly on the blockchain.


The process of creating replicas of Bitcoin does not affect its value because its supply is capped, and the authenticity is assured by the blockchain technology that underpins it.


The debate between gold and Bitcoin has sparked fresh insights into the evolving nature of digital assets. As technology progresses, Bitcoin continues to stand out for its robust verification process and the inherent limitations of its supply.


Also Read: XRP Is Heading Toward a Critical Level, Here’s What’s Happening and What Comes Next


The post Ripple CTO Weighs In on the Bitcoin Debate: Can Bitcoin Be Replicated? appeared first on 36Crypto.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
UNI Price Prediction: Critical Support Test at $5.37 – Next Target $7.88 by January 2025

UNI Price Prediction: Critical Support Test at $5.37 – Next Target $7.88 by January 2025

The post UNI Price Prediction: Critical Support Test at $5.37 – Next Target $7.88 by January 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Peter Zhang Dec 06, 2025 06:55 UNI price prediction shows critical support test at $5.37 with potential rebound to $7.88 target. Technical analysis reveals oversold conditions setting up recovery. Uniswap (UNI) is trading at a critical juncture as the token tests key support levels following a sharp 7.39% decline in the past 24 hours. With UNI currently priced at $5.51, our comprehensive technical analysis reveals both immediate risks and potential opportunities for the leading decentralized exchange token. UNI Price Prediction Summary • UNI short-term target (1 week): $6.20-$6.50 (+12-18%) • Uniswap medium-term forecast (1 month): $7.50-$8.35 range• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $5.98 (24h high) • Critical support if bearish: $5.37 (immediate support) Recent Uniswap Price Predictions from Analysts Recent analyst predictions show a mixed but cautiously optimistic outlook for UNI. Altpricer’s UNI price prediction targets $7.81 in the short term, citing slight upward momentum despite current volatility. Meanwhile, CoinCodex maintains a more conservative Uniswap forecast with an $8.35 target, though their analysis acknowledges bearish sentiment with key support levels identified at $9.02, $8.69, and $8.43. The consensus among analysts suggests that while immediate pressure exists, the UNI price target range of $7.81-$8.35 represents realistic upside potential once current support levels hold. However, confidence levels remain moderate due to broader market uncertainty and DeFi sector headwinds. UNI Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Potential Recovery The current Uniswap technical analysis reveals several compelling signals that support a cautiously bullish outlook. With UNI trading at $5.51, the token sits precariously close to its immediate support at $5.37, just 2.5% below current levels. The RSI reading of 39.09 indicates UNI is approaching oversold territory without being deeply oversold, suggesting limited downside momentum. More importantly, the Bollinger Bands analysis shows UNI at a %B…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 04:31
Zakt de Bitcoin koers naar $80.000 door liquiditeitspockets in lagere BTC prijszones?

Zakt de Bitcoin koers naar $80.000 door liquiditeitspockets in lagere BTC prijszones?

Crypto-analisten melden dat Bitcoin opnieuw rond $94.000 werd afgewezen. In de afgelopen maand daalde de BTC koers al met circa 13%, wat samenvalt met veranderingen in on-chain signalen en het gedrag van leverageposities. Volgens diverse heatmap metingen ligt er opvallend veel liquiditeit onder het huidige handelsbereik, wat wijst op mogelijke koersbewegingen richting lagere prijszones. Zakt de Bitcoin koers hierdoor binnenkort verder? Check onze Discord Connect met "like-minded" crypto enthousiastelingen Leer gratis de basis van Bitcoin & trading - stap voor stap, zonder voorkennis. Krijg duidelijke uitleg & charts van ervaren analisten. Sluit je aan bij een community die samen groeit. Nu naar Discord Bitcoin koers: belangrijke prijsniveaus blijven in beeld Crypto trader TedPillows zegt op X dat Bitcoin moeite heeft om opnieuw boven het prijsgebied net onder $94.000 te sluiten. Hij denkt dat een koersdaling richting het gebied van $88.000 tot $89.000 mogelijk blijft. Zijn analyse sluit aan bij recente heatmap data waarin grote liquiditeitspockets zichtbaar zijn in de hogere $80.000 prijszone. Liquiditeitspockets zijn gebieden waar veel openstaande orders liggen. Als de prijs daar in de buurt komt, worden deze orders geactiveerd, wat vaak voor plotselinge koersbewegingen zorgt. Deze mogelijke koersbeweging naar beneden wordt door verschillende analisten niet gezien als een trendbreuk, maar als een veelvoorkomend patroon in marktfases waarin bulls en bears elkaar snel afwisselen. Volgens meerdere technische modellen blijven de bulls actief in de buurt van bekende BTC supportzones. Bulls zijn marktdeelnemers die van hogere prijzen uitgaan; bears verwachten juist lagere prijzen. Deze twee groepen zorgen samen voor de volatiliteit van Bitcoin in periodes zonder grote macro-economische invloeden. Het Bitcoin marktsentiment op X en TradingView is verdeeld. Een groep denkt dat de recente BTC koersbeweging vooral door kortetermijn verkopen komt, waarbij grotere marktpartijen winst nemen. Anderen wijzen op indicatoren zoals de Bitcoin RSI, die aangeeft hoe overbought of oversold een asset is. Zij denken dat de RSI laat zien dat het momentum tijdelijk zwakker is. Geen van deze signalen is op zichzelf voldoende om een duidelijke koersrichting te voorspellen, maar de combinatie van on-chain activiteit en de patronen in het liquiditeitsgedrag geeft handelaren nieuwe informatie om de huidige Bitcoin marktsituatie te beoordelen. $BTC has been struggling to reclaim the $94,000 level. It seems like Bitcoin wants to go lower here before another breakout attempt. Maybe a retest of the $88,000-$89,000 support zone before another bounceback could happen. pic.twitter.com/WkhxEVqa3v — Ted (@TedPillows) December 5, 2025 Welke crypto nu kopen?Lees onze uitgebreide gids en leer welke crypto nu kopen verstandig kan zijn! Welke crypto nu kopen? De langste government shutdown in de geschiedenis van de VS is eindelijk achter de rug. Dat zorgt ervoor dat er eindelijk weer vooruitgang geboekt kan worden. Dit is erg bullish voor crypto, en dus gaan wereldberoemde traders ineens all-in op altcoins als XRP. Eén vraag komt telkens terug: welke crypto moet… Continue reading Zakt de Bitcoin koers naar $80.000 door liquiditeitspockets in lagere BTC prijszones? document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function() { var screenWidth = window.innerWidth; var excerpts = document.querySelectorAll('.lees-ook-description'); excerpts.forEach(function(description) { var excerpt = description.getAttribute('data-description'); var wordLimit = screenWidth wordLimit) { var trimmedDescription = excerpt.split(' ').slice(0, wordLimit).join(' ') + '...'; description.textContent = trimmedDescription; } }); }); Lange termijn verwachtingen van Bitcoin blijven onderwerp van discussie Crypto-analist Ali Charts deelt een Bitcoin grafiek die loopt van 2014 tot 2026. Hij koppelt deze grafiek aan terugkerende BTC patronen in de markt, zoals perioden waarin Bitcoin meerdere ‘buy’ en ‘sell’ signalen gaf. Volgens zijn model kan de Bitcoin-koers halverwege 2026 richting waarden tussen ongeveer $140.000 en $180.000 bewegen. Hij vraagt zich af of de huidige structuur wijst op nieuwe all-time highs ergens begin 2026. De reacties van BTC traders lopen uiteen. Een deel verwacht dat grotere koersbewegingen pas later ontstaan, omdat de Bitcoin halving cycli meestal tijd nodig hebben voordat er grotere adoptiegolven zichtbaar worden. Anderen denken juist dat de BTC ETF instroom een belangrijke rol kan spelen. ETF producten zoals die van BlackRock, Fidelity en Grayscale zorgen immers voor een constante vraag vanuit institutionele partijen. Deze institutionele vraag kan de Bitcoin markt beïnvloeden doordat deze partijen vaak in grote volumes kopen. Be honest! Does this setup look like Bitcoin $BTC will hit new all-time highs by January 2026? pic.twitter.com/9kT5DlB4Wr — Ali (@ali_charts) December 5, 2025 Technische niveaus blijven leidend in de huidige Bitcoin marktstructuur Technische analisten zien een belangrijke demand zone tussen ongeveer $89.000 en $90.000. Crypto-analist MrStellanSight meldt dat de BTC prijs in dit prijsgebied vaker een opleving laat zien binnen trendende markten. Een opleving is een koersbeweging omhoog vanuit een demand zone. Demand zones ontstaan wanneer veel investeerders eerder in hetzelfde prijsgebied hebben gekocht. Binnen de stijgende prijskanaal structuur van Bitcoin blijven dit soort kleine pullbacks normaal. Een kanaal is een koerspatroon dat bestaat uit een bovenste en onderste trendlijn waarbinnen de prijs beweegt. Zijn analyse laat twee belangrijke weerstandszones zien. De eerste ligt rond $95.000 tot net boven $95.500. De tweede ligt in de buurt van $98.000 en kan opnieuw een hindernis voor de bulls vormen. Weerstandsniveaus zijn prijsgebieden waar eerder veel verkoopdruk ontstond. Hierdoor moet er meer koopkracht in de markt komen om door zo’n zone heen te breken. Vooruitblik op de volgende mogelijke Bitcoin marktontwikkelingen De recente afwijzing van Bitcoin rond $94.000 laat zien dat er nog steeds een sterke weerstand aanwezig is. Tegelijk blijft de demand zone onder $90.000 belangrijk voor de bulls die de trend willen voortzetten. De combinatie van BTC ETF instroom, liquiditeitspockets en patronen in de RSI bepaalt nu grotendeels de richting van de Bitcoin markt. Zolang de vraag in het demand gebied aanwezig blijft, blijft een volgende koersbeweging omhoog mogelijk binnen het bestaande prijskanaal structuur. Best wallet - betrouwbare en anonieme wallet Best wallet - betrouwbare en anonieme wallet Meer dan 60 chains beschikbaar voor alle crypto Vroege toegang tot nieuwe projecten Hoge staking belongingen Lage transactiekosten Best wallet review Koop nu via Best Wallet Let op: cryptocurrency is een zeer volatiele en ongereguleerde investering. Doe je eigen onderzoek. Het bericht Zakt de Bitcoin koers naar $80.000 door liquiditeitspockets in lagere BTC prijszones? is geschreven door Dirk van Haaster en verscheen als eerst op Bitcoinmagazine.nl.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/07 03:02