BitcoinWorld Crypto Trust Charters: US Comptroller’s Bold Warning to Obstructive Banks In a powerful move that could reshape the financial landscape, the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency has issued a stark warning to traditional banks. Jonathan Gould has criticized the industry for actively blocking cryptocurrency firms from obtaining vital crypto trust charters. This stand challenges the status quo and signals a potential new era of integration […] This post Crypto Trust Charters: US Comptroller’s Bold Warning to Obstructive Banks first appeared on BitcoinWorld.BitcoinWorld Crypto Trust Charters: US Comptroller’s Bold Warning to Obstructive Banks In a powerful move that could reshape the financial landscape, the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency has issued a stark warning to traditional banks. Jonathan Gould has criticized the industry for actively blocking cryptocurrency firms from obtaining vital crypto trust charters. This stand challenges the status quo and signals a potential new era of integration […] This post Crypto Trust Charters: US Comptroller’s Bold Warning to Obstructive Banks first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Crypto Trust Charters: US Comptroller’s Bold Warning to Obstructive Banks

2025/12/09 04:55
A cartoon official protecting crypto trust charters from obstructive traditional banks.

BitcoinWorld

Crypto Trust Charters: US Comptroller’s Bold Warning to Obstructive Banks

In a powerful move that could reshape the financial landscape, the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency has issued a stark warning to traditional banks. Jonathan Gould has criticized the industry for actively blocking cryptocurrency firms from obtaining vital crypto trust charters. This stand challenges the status quo and signals a potential new era of integration between digital assets and mainstream finance. Why are banks resisting, and what does this mean for the future of money?

What Are Crypto Trust Charters and Why Do They Matter?

Think of a trust charter as a special banking license. It allows a company to act as a fiduciary, holding and managing assets on behalf of clients. For crypto companies, securing a crypto trust charter is a game-changer. It provides a regulated pathway to offer custodial services, legitimizes their operations, and bridges the gap to the traditional financial system. Without it, they often face an uphill battle for credibility and access.

Gould’s core argument is simple yet revolutionary: there is no valid reason to treat digital assets differently from traditional ones like stocks or bonds. He insists that banks should not be confined to outdated technologies or business models that exclude innovation. This principle is at the heart of the debate over crypto trust charters.

Why Are Traditional Banks Pushing Back?

The resistance from established banks isn’t surprising, but the Comptroller is calling it out. Banks may fear the competition, the perceived risk of a new asset class, or the complexity of compliance. However, Gould points to the data: over the past year, new charter applications rose to 14, with many tied to digital assets and fintech. The demand is clearly there.

Moreover, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is now investigating ‘de-banking’—where banks abruptly cut off services to crypto-related firms. This practice can stifle innovation and push activity into less regulated spaces. The warning against obstructing crypto trust charters is part of a broader push for fair access.

What Does This Mean for the Future of Crypto Banking?

This regulatory stance could unlock significant growth. If more firms secure crypto trust charters, we could see:

  • Enhanced Consumer Protection: Assets held under a charter are subject to strict regulatory oversight and capital requirements.
  • Mainstream Adoption: Easier for traditional investors and institutions to participate through trusted, regulated entities.
  • Innovation in Financial Services: New products blending crypto efficiency with banking stability.

The Comptroller’s position acts as a catalyst. It encourages banks to adapt rather than obstruct, fostering an environment where crypto trust charters can be evaluated on their merits, not fear.

Navigating the Path Forward for Digital Assets

The message from the top is clear: obstruction is not a strategy. The financial system must evolve. For crypto companies, this opens a door, but the path still requires navigating complex regulatory standards to prove they are safe, sound, and fair custodians worthy of a charter.

For traditional banks, the warning is an invitation—or perhaps an ultimatum—to engage with the future. They can choose to be gatekeepers of the past or architects of a modern, inclusive financial system that includes digital assets. The push for equitable access to crypto trust charters is a central battleground in this transformation.

Conclusion: A Turning Point for Finance

Jonathan Gould’s warning is more than regulatory commentary; it’s a bold declaration of principle. By challenging banks to stop obstructing crypto trust charters, he advocates for a financial ecosystem defined by technological neutrality and competitive fairness. This stance, if upheld, could accelerate the merger of traditional and digital finance, creating a more robust and innovative market for everyone. The era of walls between old and new money may finally be ending.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is a crypto trust charter?
A crypto trust charter is a special banking license granted by a state or federal regulator (like the OCC) that allows a company to operate as a fiduciary, legally holding and safeguarding cryptocurrency assets for clients, similar to how a trust company holds traditional assets.

Why is the US Comptroller getting involved?
As the head of the OCC, which charters and supervises national banks, the Comptroller ensures the federal banking system is safe, sound, and fair. He sees unequal access to charters and practices like de-banking as threats to competition and innovation.

What is ‘de-banking’ in the crypto context?
De-banking refers to when traditional banks refuse to provide or suddenly withdraw basic services (like bank accounts or payment processing) from businesses solely because they are involved with cryptocurrencies, often without clear cause.

Will this make cryptocurrencies more mainstream?
Yes, potentially. If more regulated entities can offer custodial services via trust charters, it reduces risk and complexity for large institutions and everyday investors, paving the way for broader adoption.

What are the biggest challenges for a crypto firm getting a charter?
The main hurdles are meeting stringent capital requirements, proving robust anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) systems, and demonstrating a comprehensive risk management framework for holding digital assets.

Found this insight into the future of crypto banking compelling? Help others understand this critical shift by sharing this article on your social media channels. Spark a conversation about innovation, regulation, and the future of finance!

To learn more about the latest trends in cryptocurrency regulation, explore our article on key developments shaping institutional adoption and market maturity.

This post Crypto Trust Charters: US Comptroller’s Bold Warning to Obstructive Banks first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Missed Bitcoin’s ICO? BullZilla’s Explosive Stage 13 Surge Is Your Second Shot

Missed Bitcoin’s ICO? BullZilla’s Explosive Stage 13 Surge Is Your Second Shot

The post Missed Bitcoin’s ICO? BullZilla’s Explosive Stage 13 Surge Is Your Second Shot appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects Bitcoin early believers made millions, and BullZilla Stage 13 is giving a new chance for those hunting the best crypto presales to buy with explosive ROI potential. Do cryptocurrency opportunities really come twice, or does lightning only strike once for those hunting the best crypto presales to buy? The world still talks about Bitcoin’s earliest days when the price hovered near pennies, and only a small circle of curious technophiles understood what was coming. Those early believers stacked thousands of coins when the market barely noticed them. Today, that tiny window sits in history as proof that early entries can build life-changing gains. Bitcoin’s rise from cents to tens of thousands of dollars remains the most prominent example of missed fortunes in the digital asset world. The story now moves into a new chapter as BullZilla climbs through its presale with a setup that feels familiar to anyone who watched Bitcoin explode long after ignoring it at the bottom. With the presale live, BullZilla brings a structure that pulls in traders searching for the best crypto presales to buy while regret-filled communities ask whether this could be their redemption moment. Stage 13 Zilla Sideways Smash shows the project heating up and attracting attention from those who once wished for a second chance at early prices before the next massive wave takes off. BullZilla Presale at a glance Stage: Stage 13 (Zilla Sideways Smash) Phase: 3 Current Price: $0.00033905 Presale Tally: Over $1M+ Raised  Token Holders: Over 3700 Tokens Sold: Over 32 B  Current ROI: ($1,454.75% ) from Stage 13C to the Listing Price of $0.00527 ROI until Stage 13C for the Earliest Joiners: $5,796.52% $1000 Investment =2.949 million $BZIL Tokens Upcoming Price Surge = 1.96% increase in 13D from 0.00033905 to 0.00034572 Join the BullZilla presale now while…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 07:15
US SEC Chairman: Many types of cryptocurrency ICOs are not under the SEC's jurisdiction.

US SEC Chairman: Many types of cryptocurrency ICOs are not under the SEC's jurisdiction.

PANews reported on December 10th, citing The Block, that SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated at the Blockchain Association's annual policy summit on Tuesday that many types of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) should be considered non-securities transactions and are outside the jurisdiction of Wall Street regulators. He explained that this is precisely what the SEC wants to encourage, as these types of transactions, by their definition, do not fall under the category of securities. Atkins specifically mentioned the token taxonomy he introduced last month, which divides the crypto industry into four categories of tokens. He pointed out last month that network tokens, digital collectibles, and digital instruments should not be considered securities in themselves. On Tuesday, he further stated that ICOs involving these three types of tokens should also be considered non-securities transactions, meaning they are not subject to SEC regulation. Atkins also mentioned that, regarding initial coin offerings (ICOs), the SEC believes the only type of token it should regulate is tokenized securities, which are tokenized forms of securities already under SEC regulation and traded on-chain. He further explained that ICOs span four themes, three of which fall under the jurisdiction of the CFTC. The SEC will delegate these matters to the CFTC, while focusing on regulating tokenized securities.
Share
PANews2025/12/10 07:16
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37