The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has moved to establish clearer distinctions between retail and professional investors as part of an initiative to strengthen Britain’s investment culture and maintain the country’s standing as a global financial center. The regulator announced on Monday, December 8, a package of measures aimed at giving firms more confidence when dealing […]The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has moved to establish clearer distinctions between retail and professional investors as part of an initiative to strengthen Britain’s investment culture and maintain the country’s standing as a global financial center. The regulator announced on Monday, December 8, a package of measures aimed at giving firms more confidence when dealing […]

FCA is planning to let firms gain more flexibility when dealing with professional clients

2025/12/09 05:10

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has moved to establish clearer distinctions between retail and professional investors as part of an initiative to strengthen Britain’s investment culture and maintain the country’s standing as a global financial center.

The regulator announced on Monday, December 8, a package of measures aimed at giving firms more confidence when dealing with experienced clients. The new designation framework is also expected to make the process of how retail investors access and understand investment products easier.

How will the UK FCA differentiate retail and professional investors?

Under the UK’s proposals, firms will be able to operate with professional investors outside the constraints of retail regulations, including the Consumer Duty. It ensured that the threshold to be qualified as a professional investor remains deliberately high. This way, only those with substantial experience, professional advice, or genuine capacity to bear risk are excluded from retail protections.

The changes remove what the FCA described as “arbitrary tests” in the current classification system, giving firms more direct responsibility for ensuring clients genuinely meet professional thresholds.

A new straightforward pathway will allow wealthy and experienced individuals to opt out of retail protections, though firms must demonstrate that clients provide informed consent to this arrangement.

Simon Walls, the FCA’s executive director of markets, said the measures were intended to “support investment risk culture right along the spectrum”, ensuring retail customers receive material that informs and engages them, while giving professional markets a brighter line defined by contracting parties, informed consent, and proportionate oversight.

Retail disclosures will be simpler

For ordinary investors, the regulator is making what it calls a “decisive shift” away from prescriptive templates that consumers rarely find useful. Firms will gain greater freedom to innovate in how they communicate potential returns, costs, and risks to customers, replacing the European Union-derived PRIIPs and UCITS disclosure requirements with a new Consumer Composite Investments regime built around Consumer Duty principles.

The FCA has also launched a consultation seeking views on how regulation can better support consumers to access investments that meet their needs, particularly as policymakers consider widening access to private markets for retail investors.

The discussion paper signals the regulator’s willingness to challenge perceptions of risk in a country where 55% of adults remain unwilling to take on the perceived risks of investing, according to recent abrdn research.

Analysis by Aberdeen found that half of British household wealth outside pensions is tied up in property, and 15% of the population held cash. Britain holds the third-highest proportion of wealth in both property and cash among G7 nations.

According to the asset manager’s report, if British adults allocated wealth to investments at the same rate as Americans, it could unlock up to £3.5 trillion for capital markets over the long term.

So, it makes sense that the FCA is working to reduce the barrier to entry and encourage more people to invest in a safe and regulated manner.

The regulatory package also includes measures specifically benefiting investment companies, with the FCA deciding not to require other funds to account for investment company costs when investing in them.

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31