The x402 is so crucial for stablecoin payments that some (like Lincoln Murr) have likened it to a "Trojan horse." This is an apt analogy. This Trojan horse is more than just using a "stablecoin." It gradually impacts users in three ways, thereby reshaping the financial payment network. Previously, stablecoin payments required users to: open their wallet → connect → sign the transaction → pay gas fees → wait for confirmation. This process was far too cumbersome for most non-crypto native users, as creating a crypto wallet already excluded 90% of users. The x402 process (for the user) is as follows: Open a paid content item (such as a paid short drama) → A pop-up message appears in the browser/wallet stating "3 USDC payment required," click "Allow" → Payment complete, content unlocked immediately. The user doesn't need to know that they are paying with stablecoins (such as USDC), to a specific blockchain (Base), or to an AI agent. It feels "as smooth as using Apple Pay." For users without stablecoins in their wallets, the agent can advance the payment, prompting an Apple Pay/credit card purchase of USDC, with the background automatically creating an embedded wallet (e.g., Privy SDK/Passkey). Behind this simple user payment process lies the push of all complexity to the backend. For example, the agent automatically selects the cheapest chain/exchanges stablecoins/covers gas fees. The standardization and minimalist protocol of x402 allow any website/AI application to accept stablecoin payments on any chain with just a few lines of code. First, it has subtly altered the landscape of the "payment network." Users may think they are using an "internet-based version of Apple Pay," but in reality, the payment is processed through an on-chain network (such as Base/Arbitrum/Solana), rather than Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay, Pix, etc. This means that in the future, some of the routing, clearing and settlement, data, fees, rules, review, and revenue of micro-payments will gradually be taken over by the supporting public chains/L2 ecosystems and stablecoin issuers, and the traditional payment network market will be partially eroded. Secondly, it subtly alters the user's "wallet and identity." When a user taps "Apple Pay-style payment," the backend automatically creates an embedded wallet for the user (such as a device-level self-custodied passkey/Privy-custodied private key). Subsequent on-chain operations, including depositing, borrowing, investing, and trading, can then be linked to this wallet. This is a globally universal on-chain financial wallet/identity. Third, it subtly alters the "final settlement layer of currency and value." Users initially pay in fiat currency, which is then converted into stablecoins like USDC. A portion of these stablecoins remain on-chain rather than returning to the traditional banking system. This money is used on-chain by AI agents to pay other AI agents; creators receive stablecoins and convert them into ETH for staking to earn interest; project teams use them to buy government bonds to generate more stablecoins. In this way, a portion of the stablecoins flowing onto the chain becomes on-chain liquidity, circulating as crypto dollars, rather than flowing back into the traditional financial system. In summary, X402, combined with stablecoins and crypto-on-chain infrastructure, will gradually and continuously impact the existing payment system. It not only utilizes stablecoins but also transfers money, credit, identity, and data into a parallel financial universe. During this process, the user experience is similar to traditional internet payments. Therefore, this can be considered a Trojan horse.The x402 is so crucial for stablecoin payments that some (like Lincoln Murr) have likened it to a "Trojan horse." This is an apt analogy. This Trojan horse is more than just using a "stablecoin." It gradually impacts users in three ways, thereby reshaping the financial payment network. Previously, stablecoin payments required users to: open their wallet → connect → sign the transaction → pay gas fees → wait for confirmation. This process was far too cumbersome for most non-crypto native users, as creating a crypto wallet already excluded 90% of users. The x402 process (for the user) is as follows: Open a paid content item (such as a paid short drama) → A pop-up message appears in the browser/wallet stating "3 USDC payment required," click "Allow" → Payment complete, content unlocked immediately. The user doesn't need to know that they are paying with stablecoins (such as USDC), to a specific blockchain (Base), or to an AI agent. It feels "as smooth as using Apple Pay." For users without stablecoins in their wallets, the agent can advance the payment, prompting an Apple Pay/credit card purchase of USDC, with the background automatically creating an embedded wallet (e.g., Privy SDK/Passkey). Behind this simple user payment process lies the push of all complexity to the backend. For example, the agent automatically selects the cheapest chain/exchanges stablecoins/covers gas fees. The standardization and minimalist protocol of x402 allow any website/AI application to accept stablecoin payments on any chain with just a few lines of code. First, it has subtly altered the landscape of the "payment network." Users may think they are using an "internet-based version of Apple Pay," but in reality, the payment is processed through an on-chain network (such as Base/Arbitrum/Solana), rather than Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay, Pix, etc. This means that in the future, some of the routing, clearing and settlement, data, fees, rules, review, and revenue of micro-payments will gradually be taken over by the supporting public chains/L2 ecosystems and stablecoin issuers, and the traditional payment network market will be partially eroded. Secondly, it subtly alters the user's "wallet and identity." When a user taps "Apple Pay-style payment," the backend automatically creates an embedded wallet for the user (such as a device-level self-custodied passkey/Privy-custodied private key). Subsequent on-chain operations, including depositing, borrowing, investing, and trading, can then be linked to this wallet. This is a globally universal on-chain financial wallet/identity. Third, it subtly alters the "final settlement layer of currency and value." Users initially pay in fiat currency, which is then converted into stablecoins like USDC. A portion of these stablecoins remain on-chain rather than returning to the traditional banking system. This money is used on-chain by AI agents to pay other AI agents; creators receive stablecoins and convert them into ETH for staking to earn interest; project teams use them to buy government bonds to generate more stablecoins. In this way, a portion of the stablecoins flowing onto the chain becomes on-chain liquidity, circulating as crypto dollars, rather than flowing back into the traditional financial system. In summary, X402, combined with stablecoins and crypto-on-chain infrastructure, will gradually and continuously impact the existing payment system. It not only utilizes stablecoins but also transfers money, credit, identity, and data into a parallel financial universe. During this process, the user experience is similar to traditional internet payments. Therefore, this can be considered a Trojan horse.

Why is x402 a key protocol for enabling encrypted payments?

2025/12/09 11:00

The x402 is so crucial for stablecoin payments that some (like Lincoln Murr) have likened it to a "Trojan horse." This is an apt analogy. This Trojan horse is more than just using a "stablecoin." It gradually impacts users in three ways, thereby reshaping the financial payment network.

Previously, stablecoin payments required users to: open their wallet → connect → sign the transaction → pay gas fees → wait for confirmation. This process was far too cumbersome for most non-crypto native users, as creating a crypto wallet already excluded 90% of users.

The x402 process (for the user) is as follows: Open a paid content item (such as a paid short drama) → A pop-up message appears in the browser/wallet stating "3 USDC payment required," click "Allow" → Payment complete, content unlocked immediately. The user doesn't need to know that they are paying with stablecoins (such as USDC), to a specific blockchain (Base), or to an AI agent. It feels "as smooth as using Apple Pay." For users without stablecoins in their wallets, the agent can advance the payment, prompting an Apple Pay/credit card purchase of USDC, with the background automatically creating an embedded wallet (e.g., Privy SDK/Passkey).

Behind this simple user payment process lies the push of all complexity to the backend. For example, the agent automatically selects the cheapest chain/exchanges stablecoins/covers gas fees. The standardization and minimalist protocol of x402 allow any website/AI application to accept stablecoin payments on any chain with just a few lines of code.

First, it has subtly altered the landscape of the "payment network." Users may think they are using an "internet-based version of Apple Pay," but in reality, the payment is processed through an on-chain network (such as Base/Arbitrum/Solana), rather than Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay, Pix, etc.

This means that in the future, some of the routing, clearing and settlement, data, fees, rules, review, and revenue of micro-payments will gradually be taken over by the supporting public chains/L2 ecosystems and stablecoin issuers, and the traditional payment network market will be partially eroded.

Secondly, it subtly alters the user's "wallet and identity." When a user taps "Apple Pay-style payment," the backend automatically creates an embedded wallet for the user (such as a device-level self-custodied passkey/Privy-custodied private key). Subsequent on-chain operations, including depositing, borrowing, investing, and trading, can then be linked to this wallet. This is a globally universal on-chain financial wallet/identity.

Third, it subtly alters the "final settlement layer of currency and value." Users initially pay in fiat currency, which is then converted into stablecoins like USDC. A portion of these stablecoins remain on-chain rather than returning to the traditional banking system. This money is used on-chain by AI agents to pay other AI agents; creators receive stablecoins and convert them into ETH for staking to earn interest; project teams use them to buy government bonds to generate more stablecoins. In this way, a portion of the stablecoins flowing onto the chain becomes on-chain liquidity, circulating as crypto dollars, rather than flowing back into the traditional financial system.

In summary, X402, combined with stablecoins and crypto-on-chain infrastructure, will gradually and continuously impact the existing payment system. It not only utilizes stablecoins but also transfers money, credit, identity, and data into a parallel financial universe. During this process, the user experience is similar to traditional internet payments. Therefore, this can be considered a Trojan horse.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads?

U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads?

The post U.S. Deploys Scorpion Strike Force Drones – But Do They Have Warheads? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LUCAS one way attack drone (with inert warhead) at Yuma Proving Ground U.S. Army Last week United Stated Central Command (CENTCOM) announced Task Force Scorpion Strike (TFSS), and that a squadron had already been formed, “the U.S. military’s first one-way-attack drone squadron,” based in the Middle East. The release includes images of the unit’s Low-cost Unmanned Combat Attack System (LUCAS) drones, reverse-engineered from Shaheds used by Iran and Russia. The announcement comes just four months after Pete Hegseth ordered an acceleration of the acquisition and fielding of affordable drone technology. The location in Iran’s back yard is hardly coincidental. Previously the U.S. could only launch small numbers of expensive legacy missiles. Now Scorpion Strike can unleash the sort of massive drone barrages that Russia regularly launches and “flip the script on Iran” as one U.S. official puts it. Or can it? Other information suggests LUCAS is far from ready for action. *Warhead Not Included? The U.S. Army also issued a press release last week, describing the testing of LUCAS at the Yuma Proving Ground (YPG). The image with the release shows a craft which looks identical to those displayed by CENTCOM. Scorpion Strike’s LUCAS drones CENTCOM YPG includes over 2,000 miles of restricted airspace in the desert, making it the ideal place to test long range systems. But there is no testing with live weapons yet. “We’re getting our baby steps in before we conduct safety certification testing,” states Col. Nicholas Law, Director of Experimentation in the Office of the Under Secretary of War for Research & Engineering, in the release. But it seems the warheads for the drones have not been made. “The warhead that will eventually be integrated into LUCAS isn’t constructed yet, but it will also be low-cost and mass produced by multiple manufacturers. Evaluators are currently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/09 19:03