Gulf sovereign investors are involved in a surprise bid by Paramount to acquire Warner Bros Discovery, the Hollywood studio behind the Harry Potter films, the DC Universe, Friends and Game of Thrones. The US media conglomerate made the $108.4 billion offer directly to Warner Bros Discovery’s shareholders on Monday after the company, which also owns […]Gulf sovereign investors are involved in a surprise bid by Paramount to acquire Warner Bros Discovery, the Hollywood studio behind the Harry Potter films, the DC Universe, Friends and Game of Thrones. The US media conglomerate made the $108.4 billion offer directly to Warner Bros Discovery’s shareholders on Monday after the company, which also owns […]

Gulf wealth funds in Paramount bid for Warner

2025/12/09 14:20
  • PIF, QIA and L’imad named as partners
  • Kushner’s Affinity Partners also involved
  • Paramount vies with Netflix for studio

Gulf sovereign investors are involved in a surprise bid by Paramount to acquire Warner Bros Discovery, the Hollywood studio behind the Harry Potter films, the DC Universe, Friends and Game of Thrones.

The US media conglomerate made the $108.4 billion offer directly to Warner Bros Discovery’s shareholders on Monday after the company, which also owns streaming giant HBO, announced it had accepted a different deal from Netflix on Friday.

Paramount is led through Skydance Corporation by David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder and Donald Trump ally Larry Ellison.

In a news release, Paramount said equity from the Ellison family and US investment manager RedBird Capital would finance the proposed acquisition, in combination with debt pledged by Bank of America, Citi and Apollo Capital Management.

However, a disclosure to the US Securities and Exchange Commission names Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the Qatar Investment Authority and Abu Dhabi-owned investor L’imad Holding Company as “other outside financing partners” alongside Affinity Partners, the business of Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Affinity is in turn heavily backed by PIF and recently partnered with Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund to acquire US videogame developer Electronic Arts.

Paramount’s regulatory filing says these companies would make non-voting equity investments and forgo any representation on the board or other governance rights, to avoid tripping a review on national-security grounds by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

Equity unknown

Paramount did not disclose the amount of equity the Gulf sovereign funds have made available for Monday’s hostile bid. 

A previous bid – a private acquisition proposal that Paramount submitted to Warner Bros Discovery on December 1 – included $11.8 billion of commitments from the Ellisons and a combined $24 billion from the three Gulf funds, according to a separate disclosure that Paramount filed with the SEC.

PIF and QIA were contacted for comment. Contact details for L’imad were not immediately available.

The latest offer of $30 per share aims at the entirety of Warner Bros Discovery. Netflix’s $83 billion offer would cover only its streaming services plus television and movie studios, and would spin off CNN and other cable channels.

Further reading:

  • PIF prepares for ‘leaner, meaner, but more profitable’ future
  • PIF to set out strategy for ‘all the way to 2040 and beyond’
  • Qatar’s $526bn wealth fund bets big on technology

The hostile takeover attempt escalates weeks of heated back-and-forth over the fate of Warner Bros Discovery, which had received private offers from Paramount and Netflix as well as Comcast.

Trump said on Sunday that a Netflix-Warner deal “could be a problem” and might need to go through a government anti-trust review because of the streaming behemoth it would create.

In its release on Monday, Paramount said it had the “more compelling” proposal and high confidence that it can secure “expeditious regulatory clearance”.

The Warner Bros Discovery board of directors agreed to review Paramount’s latest offer “carefully” and return its recommendation to stockholders within 10 business days.

In a statement, it advised them to “take no action at this time” and said it has not yet changed its recommendation for the Netflix deal.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

“I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia

The post “I Wasted 8 Years in Crypto”: A Builder’s Exit Note Goes Viral Across Asia appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “I am NOT building a new financial system. I built a casino.”This stark admission from Ken Chan, former co-founder of derivatives protocol Aevo, has been reverberating across Asian crypto communities this week. What began as a post on X has now crossed linguistic borders, been introduced to Chinese communities by local news media, and been widely shared among Korean traders, accumulating millions of views along the way. Sponsored Sponsored From Ayn Rand to Disillusionment: A Libertarian’s Journey Through Crypto Chan’s confession is not merely a critique—it is the unraveling of a personal ideology. He describes himself as a “starry-eyed libertarian” who donated to Gary Johnson’s 2016 presidential campaign after being radicalized by Ayn Rand’s novels. The cypherpunk ethos of Bitcoin spoke directly to this worldview. “Being able to walk across the border with a billion dollars in your head is and always will be a powerful idea to me,” he writes. Yet eight years of industry experience eroded that idealism. Chan recounts how the Layer 1 wars—the flood of capital into Aptos, Sui, Sei, ICP, and countless others—produced no meaningful progress toward a new financial system. Instead, it “literally torched everyone’s money” in pursuit of becoming the next Solana. His verdict is unsparing: “We do not need to build the Casino on Mars.” According to his LinkedIn profile, Chan departed Aevo in May this year. His personal website indicates he is now working on KENSAT, a personal satellite project. It is scheduled to launch aboard a Falcon 9 in June 2026. His confession arrives six months after his departure. It comes as AEVO token trades at roughly $45 million in fully diluted market cap—down approximately 99% from its peak. Chan’s central metaphor—that crypto has become “the biggest, online, multi-player 24/7 casino our generation has ever concocted”—cuts through technical complexity with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 11:04
Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning

Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning

The post Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has warned that Bitcoin developers must prepare for a potential quantum computing breakthrough that could render the network’s current security measures outdated. Summary At the All-In Summit, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko reignited debate over Bitcoin’s long-term security. There’s a “50/50” chance that quantum computers could break its cryptographic defenses within five years. Rapid advances in AI show how quickly theory can become reality. The question is not just if Bitcoin must migrate to quantum-safe cryptography—but when. According to Yakovenko, who was speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, there is a “50/50” probability that within five years, quantum computers will be strong enough to crack the cryptographic safeguards protecting Bitcoin wallets. The concern centers on quantum machines running algorithms like Shor’s, which could crack the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm currently protecting Bitcoin (BTC) private keys. This would allow attackers to forge transactions and compromise wallets, creating an existential risk for the network. Yakovenko argued that “we should migrate Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant signature scheme” before such technology becomes viable. Skeptics like Blockstream’s Adam Back downplay immediacy of threat The Bitcoin community remains divided on the urgency of quantum threats. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, estimated that the technology is still relatively far away and argued that making Bitcoin quantum-ready is “relatively simple.” Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd dismissed current quantum computers as non-existent, stating that “demos running toy problems do not count.” Luke Dashjr, another Bitcoin Core contributor, suggested quantum threats pose less immediate danger than spam transactions and developer corruption issues the community currently faces. Bitcoin’s design complicates any quantum upgrade. A migration to post-quantum cryptography would require a hard fork, a highly contentious and technically complex process needing widespread network support. Yakovenko countered skepticism by pointing to quick AI advances as evidence of how…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/22 01:33